by | July 11, 2015 · 4:06 pm

The New York Times is lying about A Time for Truth

2015_07 11 Ted Cruz Time for Truth

Sources:

4 Comments

Filed under Books, Media Bias, Ted Cruz

4 responses to “The New York Times is lying about A Time for Truth”

  1. karmakelli's avatar karmakelli
    July 11, 2015 at 8:05 pm

    Our national debt has been stuck at $18,112,975,000,000 for something like six weeks now. I remember some months back there was a conservative You Tube video, for a Dinesh D’Souza trailer or something, that had like a half million views but kept being adjusted back down to 6,000. The latest unemployment figure declined to 5.3, at the same time a half million fewer Americans are working (and all net job gains for the past four years have gone to immigrants).

    This latest NYT duplicity corroborates the comment I made below … our betters are now lying to us about everything with complete impunity. They no longer even care that we know they’re lying, which is a pretty strong sign the party’s over.

    Hillary is the perfect candidate for our Age of Deception.

    Like

  2. chrissythehyphenated's avatar chrissythehyphenated
    July 13, 2015 at 7:00 pm

    Publishing giant HarperCollins is publicly pushing back against the New York Times’ claim that Ted Cruz’s new book, A Time For Truth, was disqualified from its bestseller list because sales were limited to “strategic bulk purchases.” In a statement provided to BuzzFeed News, HarperCollins publicity director Tina Andreadis said the company looked into the matter and “found no evidence of bulk orders or sales through any retailer or organization.”

    It is common practice for politicians to try to game the Times’ prestigious bestseller list by having their campaigns or political action committees buy up thousands of copies of their books. When Cruz’s book was left off the list this week despite outselling many of the entries that did make it, the paper’s spokesperson justified the omission by telling Politico they found an “overwhelming preponderance of evidence” that the sales numbers were being padded by bulk purchases.

    By publicly refuting the Times’ claim, HarperCollins is taking on one of the most influential forces in the publishing industry — an exceedingly rare move for any large publisher.

    http://pjmedia.com/tatler/2015/07/12/harpercollins-to-new-york-times-drop-dead/

    Like