What’s not to like?

BENGHAZI sweeping under rug

I like Tom Quiner’s piece on Hillary’s testimony, particularly since he spared me the agony of actually reading or, worse, listening to any of it. He addresses his critique to Her “It’s My Turn” Majesty:

I don’t like the fact that you lied about the root cause of the Benghazi attack.

I don’t like the way that you blamed it on an American-made YouTube video instead of on a Muslim-made planned terrorist attack, when you KNEW Muslims were the bad guys, not some doofus American.

I don’t like it when you said you lost sleep over the loss of American life in Benghazi. And yet you didn’t give Ambassador Stevens your e-mail when he was begging for increased security. You didn’t stick around while our embassy burned, but instead you went home for some shut eye.

I don’t like it that you didn’t talk to then-Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta or Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Martin Dempsey during or immediately after the attack.

I don’t like that you said you didn’t use left-wing partisan attack dog, Sidney Blumenthal as an advisor, when you clearly did.

I don’t like it that you said you were transparent about your e-mails, when even the State Department admits you weren’t.

I don’t like it when you said Ambassador Stevens felt “comfortable on the ground” when his team asked for more security 600 times.

In other words, Hillary, I don’t enjoy your deceit.

And that’s the honest truth.

Read his full text @

Comments Off on What’s not to like?

Filed under Benghazi, Chris Stevens, Hillary Clinton

Comments are closed.