Category Archives: Books

Kids and Books

Einstein fairy tales
A child who reads

12 Comments

Filed under Books

Books

BOOKS my favorite game

librarian*

mysteries

4 Comments

Filed under Books, Humor

Back when the CINC still cared about our troops

The following is an excerpt from And the Good News Is …: Lessons and Advice from the Bright Side, by Dana Perino, who served as President George W. Bush’s Press Secretary.

Dana Perino book jacket

News of America’s military men and women were wounded and killed in Iraq and Afghanistan almost overwhelmed me on some days. I may have sounded strong when I was talking to the press, but sometimes I had to push my feelings way down in order to get any words out of my mouth to make statements and answer questions.

The hardest days were when President Bush went to visit the wounded or families of the fallen. If it was tough for me, you can only imagine what it was like for the families and for a president who knew that his decisions led his troops into battles where they fought valiantly but were severely injured or lost their lives.

He regularly visited patients at Walter Reed military hospital near the White House. These stops were unannounced because of security concerns and hassles for the hospital staff that come with a full blown presidential visit.

One morning in 2005, Scott McClellan sent me in his place to visit the wounded warriors. It was my first time for that particular assignment, and I was nervous about how the visits would go.

The president was scheduled to see twenty-five patients at Walter Reed. Many of them had traumatic brain injuries and were in very serious, sometimes critical, condition. Despite getting the best treatment available in the world, we knew that some would not survive.

We started in the intensive care unit. The Chief Naval Officer (CNO) briefed the president on our way into the hospital about the first patient we’d see. He was a young Marine who had been injured when his Humvee was hit by a roadside bomb. After his rescue, he was flown to Landstuhl U.S. Air Force Base in Kaiserslautern, Germany. At his bedside were his parents, wife, and five-year-old son.

“What’s his prognosis?” the president asked.

“Well, we don’t know sir, because he’s not opened his eyes since he arrived, so we haven’t been able to communicate with him. But no matter what, Mr. President, he has a long road ahead of him,” said the CNO.

We had to wear masks because of the risk of infection to the patient. I watched carefully to see how the family would react to President Bush, and I was worried that they might be mad at him and blame him for their loved one’s situation. But I was wrong.

The family was so excited the president had come. They gave him big hugs and thanked him over and over. Then they wanted to get a photo. So he gathered them all in front of Eric Draper, the White House photographer.

President Bush asked, “Is everybody smiling?” But they all had ICU masks on. A light chuckle ran through the room as everyone got the joke.

The soldier was intubated. The president talked quietly with the family at the foot of the patient’s bed. I looked up at the ceiling so that I could hold back tears.

After he visited with them for a bit, the president turned to the military aide and said, “Okay, let’s do the presentation.” The wounded soldier was being awarded the Purple Heart, given to troops that suffer wounds in combat.

Everyone stood silently while the military aide in a low and steady voice presented the award. At the end of it, the Marine’s little boy tugged on the president’s jacket and asked, “What’s a Purple Heart?”

The president got down on one knee and pulled the little boy closer to him. He said, “It’s an award for your dad, because he is very brave and courageous, and because he loves his country so much. And I hope you know how much he loves you and your mom, too.”

As he hugged the boy, there was a commotion from the medical staff as they moved toward the bed.

The Marine had just opened his eyes. I could see him from where I stood.

The CNO held the medical team back and said, “Hold on, guys. I think he wants the president.”

The president jumped up and rushed over to the side of the bed. He cupped the Marine’s face in his hands. They locked eyes, and after a couple of moments the president, without breaking eye contact, said to the military aide, “Read it again.”

So we stood silently as the military aide presented the Marine with the award for a second time. The president had tears dripping from his eyes onto the Marine’s face. As the presentation ended, the president rested his forehead on the Marine’s for a moment.

Now everyone was crying, and for so many reasons: the sacrifice; the pain and suffering; the love of country; the belief in the mission; and the witnessing of a relationship between a soldier and his Commander in Chief that the rest of us could never fully grasp. (In writing this book, I contacted several military aides who helped me track down the name of the Marine. I hoped for news that he had survived. He did not. He died during surgery six days after the president’s visit. He is buried at Arlington Cemetery and is survived by his wife and their three children.)

And that was just the first patient we saw. For the rest of the visit to the hospital that day, almost every family had the same reaction of joy when they saw the president.

But there were exceptions. One mom and dad of a dying soldier from the Caribbean were devastated, the mom beside herself with grief. She yelled at the president, wanting to know why it was her child and not his who lay in that hospital bed.

Her husband tried to calm her and I noticed the president wasn’t in a hurry to leave—he tried offering comfort but then just stood and took it, like he expected and needed to hear the anguish, to try to soak up some of her suffering if he could.

Later as we rode back on Marine One to the White House, no one spoke.

But as the helicopter took off, the president looked at me and said, “That mama sure was mad at me.” Then he turned to look out the window of the helicopter. “And I don’t blame her a bit.”

One tear slipped out the side of his eye and down his face. He didn’t wipe it away, and we flew back to the White House.

Source:
http://dailysignal.com/2015/04/21/why-george-w-bush-let-a-soldiers-mom-yell-at-him/

4 Comments

Filed under Armed Forces, Books, George W. Bush

Clinton Cash

On May 5, look for the release of “Clinton Cash: The Untold Story of How and Why Foreign Governments and Businesses Helped Make Bill and Hillary Rich” by Peter Schweizer.

Clinton Cash

The New York Times recently called it “the most anticipated and feared book of a presidential cycle.”

Clintonistas are predictably calling it a conservative hit job, but the NYT says this is hard to justify, since Schweizer meticulously documents his sources, including tax records and government documents.”

Schweizer is a three-time New York Times bestselling investigative journalist, president of the non-partisan Government Accountability Institute (GAI) and a Senior Editor-at-Large at Breitbart News.

Source:
http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2015/04/19/new-york-times-clinton-cash-most-anticipated-and-feared-book-of-a-presidential-cycle/

Comments Off on Clinton Cash

Filed under Bill Clinton, Books, Hillary Clinton

The Harbinger: An Update

Have you read or seen The Harbinger? I just saw an update.  It seems that the “Tree of Hope” has died and been quietly removed and destroyed.  Pastor Cahn, author of The Harbinger, says this is a sign that “America is approaching a day of judgment.”

Ground Zero - Trinity Church trees

Harbinger “Tree Of Hope” Dies At Ground Zero In New York

The NABRE (Catholic translation): “‘Bricks have fallen, but we will rebuild with cut stone; Sycamores have been felled, but we will replace them with cedars.’ So the Lord raises up their foes against them and stirs up their enemies to action.” – Isaiah 9:9-10.

These are verses Isaiah 9:10-11 in the Protestant translations.  They’re off by one, because the verse labeled Isaiah 9:1 in the Protestant Bibles is called Isaiah 8:23 in the Catholic translations.  The verse numbers match again starting with Isaiah 10:1. I haven’t got a clue why this is, but I’ve seen something similar happen in Psalms.

Also, Pastor Cahn has a new book coming out September 2:

Read more @
Harbinger Author Says Loss of ‘Tree of Hope’ A Warning – Aug 9, 2014

‘Harbinger’ author says loss of ‘Tree of Hope’ a warning

3 Comments

Filed under 9/11, Books

Not a Hard Choice at all

2014_07 29 Gillibrand Hard Choices hashtag

Amazon readers also chimed in with their 947 one star reviews. Samples from the first 6 (of 95) pages:

  • I wish I could give this book negative stars.
  • It’s all I ME MYSELF!!!
  • “Cheesy, trite, and meaningless” from “a strong liberal who really wanted to like this book.”
  • As SecState, she floated around the world for four years at taxpayer expense and failed to do a single thing.
  • This was clearly a fundraising book for her campaign. She just lost one vote.
  • Positively the worst book that has ever been written. Lie after lie after lie.
  • This was an excruciatingly tortured read.
  • It read like an early high school, “What did you do on your summer vacation with machine guns tied to the car, Johnny?”
  • I’d rather get a root canal than read this hideous and boring book again.
  • This is the first time I’ve seen a book with five times as many one star as five star reviews.
  • One star is five too many for this book.
  • The dictionary is a better read.
  • Immature writing that would have been panned in 11th grade English.
  • I feel bad for the trees that were wasted.
  • I was expecting an insightful look at the ins and outs of the White House and State Department. I should have spent my $30 on dinner.
  • If this lazy, arrogant, dishonest coward becomes our next President, after 8 years of Obama, we will be completely done in.
  • The hardest choice Hillary ever had to face was what flavor of cake to eat.
  • I used to admire her for standing by her man; turns out, she was more gold digger than heroine.
  • A litany of self-serving, self-aggrandizing tripe.
  • Wait for the movie, then don’t watch it.
  • Once I was done reading the book, I needed to take a shower to wash away the nonsensical hogwash that I was force-fed.
  • Reading this made me want to stick a fork in my eye.
  • I would rather have my scrotum sewn to the carpet than read another page.

Palin v Clinton - book sales week 1

Sources:

https://twitter.com/hashtag/offthesidelines?src=hash

Comments Off on Not a Hard Choice at all

Filed under Books, Hillary Clinton, Sarah Palin

Killing and dying as a form of worship

Son of Hamas

July 24, 2014: CNN interview with the son of the founder of Hamas

“Hamas is not seeking coexistence and compromise. Hamas is seeking conquest.”

1 Comment

Filed under Books, Christianity, Hamas, Islam

You can’t buy publicity like this!

After Costco (co-founded by a major Democratic donor) announced it would NOT be carrying Dinesh D’Souza’s latest book, America: Imagine the World Without Her, the title soared to #1 on Amazon.com.

Book reviewers made their opinion of Costco clear on the Amazon website:

  • Costco I don’t have to shop there!!! Just saying!
  • Screw Costco … I’ll buy it here. Thanks, Amazon !!!
  • Heard about this book being banned by Costco. Ordered my America here.

Caving to consumer ire, Costco has announced that it will be restocking the book immediately.

Dontcha just love the free market. LOL

2014_07 09 D'Souza tweet

Source:

Comments Off on You can’t buy publicity like this!

Filed under Books, Dinesh D'Souza

The only hard choice left is who at Simon & Schuster gets fired

2014_07 10 Hillary's book  46 at USA Today

As much as I enjoy seeing Clinton’s snoozefest (or so I hear) flop and don’t care if S&S takes a bath on it (hurray for free market capitalism), I’m very suspicious about the “Clintons vs. Obamas” book coming out just as the Democrat slobberers at MSNBC are suddenly pulling their chins over what a crappy job Barack is doing in the White House.

Methinks this is the new meme: Obama is a LOSER! Hillary never liked him! Vote for Hillary! It would be so like the Lefties’ Big Bucks Backers (LBBB) to throw him under the bus for her benefit in 2016.  After all, they threw her under the bus for his benefit in 2008.  All the LBBBs care about is having a cooperative puppet in the Oval Office so they can keep calling the shots. They don’t give a crap who it is … or who it was.  Barack can’t run again, so he’s become useless to them and Hillary’s proven herself to be a loyal lying liar with a loyal base aching to see a Democrat become the first female president.  We can be sure the GOP will be too dumb and/or sold out to the LBBBs who fund them under the table to ever put a female up against HRC, just like they made sure to NOT put a Black up against BHO.

Sources:

Comments Off on The only hard choice left is who at Simon & Schuster gets fired

Filed under Barack Obama, Books, Democrats, Hillary Clinton

Another look at “Who Really Cares?”

Who really cares w quot

The LA Times is irked about the 2006 book “Who Really Cares,” by Arthur C. Brooks, in which Brooks reported on a DECADE of research, both within the United States and overseas, into the single question of how one’s political beliefs affect one’s personal charitable behavior.

Brooks wrote in his preface that he was raised liberal and went into this field specifically to prove to conservatives that liberals were more charitable. After ten years of finding out he was wrong, wrong and wrong (even abroad), he gave it up and admitted that right-wingers give a larger percentage of their money and more of their time and blood than left-wingers, even when donations to churches are removed.

Two points here are really important, because this LA Times article is very sneering about Brooks’ findings. http://www.latimes.com/business/hiltzik/la-fi-mh-conservatives-or-liberals-20140331-story.html. (Methinks the writer never actually read the book, but is merely reporting on what he kinda sorta heard was reported about it by others.)

Point One: Brooks’ research was his dedicated field of study for a decade. He was TRYING to prove liberals were more generous. He failed. The LA Times article supposedly trashes all that with ONE study slapped together by two guys at MIT?  Riiiiiiiiight.

Point Two:  The MIT and LA Times both stressed that conservatives only give more because they’re generous personally AND to their churches. There are two problems with this. The major one is that Brooks addressed that and found it to be incorrect. There’s a whole bunch of stuff about that in his book … which I read. In fact, I own it. He found that conservatives give more overall AND give a larger percentage of their income and more volunteer hours to both church and to non-church charities; heck we even give more blood!

Also, the attitude expressed in the article is that church donations are inherently “not generous”, because churches only use the money to benefit their own wealthy members. Obviously, these people actually believe that churches are just really boring country clubs, which makes me suspect they have (a) not read Brooks’ book and (b) never spent any time in a real church. Where I live, the kitchen cupboard, soup kitchen, homeless shelter, thrift shop, and “second chance” housing project (for convicts who have served their time) are all church-backed projects. The churches in my area also provide low cost space for non-church activities like day care and aerobics classes.

I can’t speak to other congregations, but my parish never refuses a family the use of our beautiful facility for weddings or funerals just because they have never darkened the doorstep before. And I know for a fact that my diocese continued to fund an inner city school long after the Catholic kids had moved to the burbs. All the students were black Baptists; even the principal was a black Baptist. And no, it wasn’t about proselytizing; it was about providing the ONLY quality educational opportunity that neighborhood had after the public school had become a wasteland of politically correct mediocrity and violence.

Point Three: The LA Times article seems to assume (or totally ignores … probably didn’t read the book) the over-arching point of Brooks’ book, which was that big government welfare is bad for human beings in a way that is rarely or never acknowledged. In short, it makes people selfish and selfishness makes people unhappy. If you haven’t read the book, I encourage you to do so. It’s enlightening and uplifting, unlike the LA Times article which is sneering and left me wanting to take a bath.

1 Comment

Filed under Books, Christianity, Media Bias, Welfare