Source:
The Lawyers Behind the Lawsuit against Obama By Ian Tuttle – July 5, 2014
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/382021/lawyers-behind-lawsuit-against-obama-ian-tuttle
Category Archives: Barack Obama
Suing POTUS
Comments Off on Suing POTUS
Filed under Barack Obama
“Constitutional lawyer”? My Aunt Fanny!
The Leftstream media keeps calling Barack Obama a “Constitutional lawyer”, as if this somehow makes him qualified to stick his nose in the air and sneer at SCOTUS decisions he doesn’t like.
But the fact is that Barack Obama was never a professor of Constitutional Law and never once argued a case before the Supreme Court. He isn’t even licensed to practice law, having surrendered that right in 2008.
The most common reason for a lawyer to “retire” at such a young age is to avoid being brought up on charges. In his autobiography, Obama says he was known for years as Barry Soetoro and that he used marijuana and cocaine. On his bar application, he said he had never used another name nor used drugs. Lying on your bar application is grounds for disbarment. Obama avoided having this on his record by voluntarily retiring.
Sources:
- http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/09pdf/08-1569.pdf
- http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/carachuri-rosendo-v-holder/
- http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/henderson-v-shinseki/ (Kagan did not take part)
- http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/united-states-v-tinklenberg/ (Kagan did not take part)
- http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/judulang-v-holder/
- http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/hosanna-tabor-evangelical-lutheran-church-and-school-v-eeoc/
- http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/united-states-v-jones/
- http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/sackett-et-vir-v-environmental-protection-agency-et-al/
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arizona_v._United_States (Kagan did not take part)
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arkansas_Game_and_Fish_Commission_v._United_States (Kagan did not take part)
- http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/gabelli-v-securities-and-exchange-commission/
- http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/ppl-corp-and-subsidiaries-v-commissioner-of-internal-revenue/
- http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/horne-v-department-of-agriculture/
- http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/sekhar-v-united-states/
- http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/burrage-v-united-states/
- http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/bond-v-united-states-2/
- http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/riley-v-california/
- http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/national-labor-relations-board-v-noel-canning/
- http://citizenwells.wordpress.com/2012/04/09/obama-illinois-bar-application-fraud-obama-lied-about-drug-use-other-names-and-tickets-andy-martin-complaint-letter-to-il-attorney-registration-disciplinary-commission/
Filed under Barack Obama, Constitution, Supreme Court
President of the Thin-Skinned Club
In Minnesota, while delivering yet another speech about how he’s going to fix the economy just as soon as George Boosh and Congress get out of his way, the Whiner-in-Chief described some of the critical letters he receives.
One of them even said,
“You are an idiot and the worst president ever.”
Be still my heart. How can he bear it?! More importantly … has the incompetent nincompoop who let him see such an ego-bruiser been fired yet?
BEST TWEET:
There are a million people out there right now saying “OMG, he read my letter!”
Runners up for best tweet:
- Remember that time Bush whined about the letters he got? Yeah, me neither.
- Golly, I’ll bet no president in history ever received letters like that. Not.
- Can’t say I approve of the name-calling, but the accuracy . . . NAILED IT
- But enough about what Bill Clinton thinks.
Comments Off on President of the Thin-Skinned Club
Filed under Barack Obama
Lamebana Excuse Trashed in One Tweet
Filed under Barack Obama, Economy, Ronald Reagan, Ted Cruz
Obama Suffers 12th Unanimous Defeat in SCOTUS
If Obama’s Department of Justice had been successful in these cases, the federal government would now have the power to:
• Attach a GPS to a citizen’s vehicle to monitor his movements, without having any cause to believe that person committed a crime (United States v. Jones).
• Deprive landowners of the right to challenge potential government fines as high as $75,000 per day and eliminate their ability to have a hearing to challenge those fines (Sackett v. EPA).
• Interfere with a church’s selection of its own ministers (Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church & School v. EEOC).
• Override state law whenever the President desires (Arizona v. United States).
• Dramatically extend statutes of limitations to impose penalties for acts committed decades ago (Gabelli v. SEC).
• Destroy private property without paying just compensation (Arkansas Fish & Game Commission vs. United States).
• Impose double income taxation (PPL Corp. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue).
• Limit a property owner’s constitutional defenses (Horne v. USDA).
• Drastically expand federal criminal law (Sekhar v. United States).
• Charge petty crimes as terrorism under federal law (Bond v. United States).
• Discover regulatory powers beyond the intention of statutes passed by Congress (Utility Air Regulatory Group v. EPA).
• Ignore the Senate’s right to oversee all presidential appointments (NLRB v. Canning).
To give you a flavor for the aggressive overreach these cases represent:
- Bond v. United States: Bond had smeared a couple of toxic chemicals on surfaces her husband’s mistress was likely to touch and gave the woman a mild rash. The feds actually charged her with possession and use of a chemical weapon! SCOTUS ruled unanimously that this was unconstitutional.
- Utility Air Regulatory Group v. EPA: The EPA decided to regulate carbon dioxide to such a degree that it would essentially bring construction to a halt nationwide. SCOTUS condemned the EPA’s attempt to go far beyond the bounds of what the legislation passed by Congress ever intended or allowed.
Senator Mike Lee (R-UT) says these twelve defeats represent only “the tip of the iceberg” because more cases concerning presidential overreach are still working their way up to the Supreme Court.
Sources:
The Legal Limit: The Obama Administration’s Attempts to Expand Federal Power
By U.S. Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX), Ranking Member, Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on The Constitution, civil Rights and Human Rights http://www.cruz.senate.gov/files/documents/The%20Legal%20Limit/The%20Legal%20Limit%20Report%201.pdf
Court rules against Obama – June 2, 2014
http://conservativetribune.com/court-rules-against-obama/
Obama EPA Suffers Humiliating Defeat at SCOTUS – June 24, 2014
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2014/06/24/Obama-EPA-Suffers-Humiliating-Defeat-at-SCOTUS-Media-Gets-It-Wrong
Obama Suffers 12th Unanimous Defeat at Supreme Court By Joel Gehrke – June 26, 2014
http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/381302/obama-suffers-12th-unanimous-defeat-supreme-court-joel-gehrke
Filed under Barack Obama, Constitution, EPA, Supreme Court
Thanks for nothing, Obama voters!
Megyn Kelly says how bad it is [1:22]
June 24, 2014: Economy shrank 2.9% in 1Q, worst drop since ’09
http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/business/2014/06/25/economy-first-quarter/11332011/
Filed under Barack Obama, Benghazi, Economy, Fast & Furious, IRS, National Debt, NSA, Obamacare, Poverty, Unemployment
Is that not treason?
January 19, 2014: Former Navy SEAL Ben Smith at SC Tea Party Coalition Convention [3:22]
Sources:
Comments Off on Is that not treason?
Filed under Al Qaeda, Armed Forces, Barack Obama, Iraq, Islam, Muslim Brotherhood, Syria, Tea Party
Obama fundamentally changed America
Filed under Barack Obama, George W. Bush, Iraq
Dunno if we should hide now or what
I do take comfort in knowing that Obama’s Jobs Task Force accomplished exactly nothing.
Filed under Barack Obama
Unaccompanied Alien Children
On January 29th of this year, the federal government posted an advertisement seeking bids for a vendor contract to handle a very specific number (65,000) of “Unaccompanied Alien Children” who were expected to flood over the border of Texas during a period of several months to a year.
How could they possibly anticipate 65,000 unaccompanied minors at a specific border during a specific time period? And what are all these kids DOING coming here from CENTRAL AMERICA?! Where are their parents?!
And what the hell is it with this “of course we just take in everybody who climbs the fence” thing? How come they weren’t taken in and cared for or sent back home as they passed through Mexico? Hmmm?
TRY traveling in Mexico without proper identification and a visa. The first time they catch you, they toss you over the fence. The second time, they toss you into one of their comfy-cozy prisons that make Gitmo look like the Marriott.

Interesting, isn’t it, how this invasion targeted only Republican Texas, home of the hated George W. Bush?
This was an engineered “crisis” of the worst kind. But then, we are talking about Obamacrats. Who else but America-hating abortion mongers would even conceive of such an evil plan, never mind actually carry it out?!
Question: If DHS Is “Surprised” At The Number Of Unaccompanied Minors Crossing The Border, Then Why Were They Looking For A Vendor To Support 65,000 Unaccompanied Minors In January?
http://theconservativetreehouse.com/2014/06/20/question-if-dhs-is-surprised-at-the-number-of-unaccompanied-minors-crossing-the-border-then-why-where-they-looking-for-a-vendor-to-support-65000-unaccompanied-minors-in-january/
Stunning: DHS solicited bids for vendor to handle 65,000 unaccompanied minors — IN JANUARY! By Thomas Lifson – June 20, 2014
http://americanthinker.com/blog/2014/06/stunning_dhs_solicited_bids_for_vendor_to_handle_65000_unaccompanied_minors__in_january.html
January 29, 2014: Homeland Security posted a request for “Escort Services for Unaccompanied Alien Children” on the Federal Business Opportsunities website. The request specified there would be 65,000 such children and that they would not be English speakers.
https://www.fbo.gov/index?s=opportunity&mode=form&id=c6d7c0050b912fbc917a46d6709d38bd&tab
Red States and Blue States
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_states_and_blue_states
Filed under Barack Obama, Immigration
























