Category Archives: Life Issues

Pro-Abortion activists: The “gift” that keeps on stinking

2013_07 09 pro abort tweets death threat

2013_07 12 Pro Aborts plan disgusting protest

2013_07 12 Jesus isn't a

Typical liberal argument:

  • “Keep the government out of my sex life!”
  • “The government has to guarantee my right to get gay married!”
  • “Keep the government out of my reproductive decisions!”
  • “The government has to pay for my birth control and abortions!”
  • “If a complete ban on gun saves even one child, we MUST do it!”
  • “Abortion on demand and without apologies!”

Typical Conservative Response

  •  “If your side of the debate is getting ready to throw urine and feces, your side has lost!”

LATE BREAKING GOOD NEWS!

Texas Senate passed the post-20-week abortion ban!

Bill now moves on to Governor Perry for his signature!

Sources:

1 Comment

Filed under Abortion, Democrats, Life Issues, Rick Perry

BREAKING: Pro-Life court victory

The Illinois Supreme Court unanimously upheld a parental notification law enacted way back in 1995.

Thomas More Society, the pro-life legal team based in Illinois that has been pushing enforcement of this law, has posted a synopsis of this incredibly drawn out court battle.

The ACLU was the first to sue to block the law, later joined by the giant Hope Clinic abortion mill in Granite City – conveniently located close to the Missouri border.

The Illinois Parental Notice of Abortion Act of 1995 is scheduled to go into effect in 35 days. It isn’t perfect. It allows for notification of not only one parent but also “a person over 21 years of age who is the parent, grandparent, step-parent living in the household, or legal guardian.”

In the law a minor is considered anyone under 18, so the consenter could easily be the baby daddy or a parent of the baby daddy. (Pro-Life activists say they see a LOT of girls pressured into abortion by the mother of the baby daddy.)

This loose verbiage isn’t great. But it is way better than nothing.

Source:

BREAKING: IL Supreme Court upholds 18-yr-old parental notification law

2 Comments

Filed under Abortion, Life Issues

Americans OPPOSE post-20 week abortion 2 to 1

New Poll: Do you support or oppose banning abortions after 20-weeks of pregnancy?

59% SUPPORT vs. 30% OPPOSE

This poll was commissioned by the liberal Huffington Post.

The Face of the Aborted

Planned Parenthood president Cecile Richards and her pro-abortion friends took to Capitol Hill today to rally for keeping abortions legal right up to the day of birth. Sen. Al Franken of Minnesota and Rep Rosa DeLauro of Connecticut joined them. According to Richards, “It is very rare for a woman to need to terminate a pregnancy after 20 weeks.” It is definitely less common than before 20 weeks, but at more than 1 per day in Texas alone, I wouldn’t call that exactly “rare.” Would you? Richards also refused to respond when asked if it was wrong to kill a post-20-week fetus who was healthy. The Pro-Aborts try to make out like these late termers are only for severe medical problems, but the Pro-Life movement knows it is also done for absurdly casual and frivolous reasons.

2012_08 08 I don't want no more girls

900 families asked for the chance to adopt a baby with Down Syndrome whose life was at risk of abortion. Pro-Abortion writer sneered at this, calling it “coercion” of the birth mother to carry a “nonviable fetus” who would lead a “terrible life” to term. According to her, “anti-abortion folks care more about fetuses with fairytale narratives than actual babies.” Yeah, right. This would be why they were all begging for the right to ADOPT this child. For LIFE. Sheesh.

Comments Off on Americans OPPOSE post-20 week abortion 2 to 1

Filed under Abortion, Adoption, Al Franken, Cecile Richards, Life Issues, Planned Parenthood, Polls

Majority of Americans are Pro-Life

TWO recent polls demonstrate that the MAJORITY of AMERICANS believe the UNBORN have a RIGHT to LIFE.

MAY 2013

2013_05 GALLUP Abortion poll

MARCH 2013

53%* of Americans are Pro-Life:

  • Abortion should be prohibited in all circumstances: 11%
  • Abortion should be legal only to save the life of the mother: 14%
  • Abortion should be legal only to save the life of the mother, or in cases of rape or incest: 28%
  • NOTE: Only one to three percent of all abortions in the U.S. are for life, rape, incest.

30%* of Americans are Pro-Choice:

  • Abortion should be legal for any reason but not after the first three months of pregnancy: 20%
  • Abortion should be legal for any reason but not after the first 6 months of pregnancy: 10%
  • NOTE: The large body of scientific and medical research indicates that by at least 20 weeks, unborn children are capable of feeling the excruciating pain of abortion. Once this fact is explained to them, a significant number of Pro-Choice Americans choose to support the Pain-Capable Unborn Protection Acts that seek to outlaw these “torture until death” procedures. According to the CDC, approximately 1.27 babies are tortured to death per day in Texas alone, a state that is widely considered to be largely Pro-Life.

12%* of Americans are Pro-Abortion:

  • Abortion should be legal for any reason at any time during a woman’s pregnancy: 12%
  • NOTE: The official Democrat Party Platform on abortion not only takes this extremist, minority opinion, but goes even further to demand that all Americans PAY for abortions, regardless of their religious beliefs or conscience objections.

*National Poll of All Americans conducted by the Polling Company February 28-March 3, 2013 with 1,000 respondents and a 3.1% margin of error.

Sources:

4 Comments

Filed under Abortion, Life Issues, Polls

The Fifth Commandment: You shall not kill.

Respect LIFE

The Book of Exodus, translated literally, says “You shall not murder” (Ex 20:13).

We should easily understand the distinction, since our own laws distinguish between First Degree (pre-meditated) Murder, Second-Degree (meant it but didn’t plan it) Murder, Manslaughter (my own actions could and did cause the death of another), Self-Defense (it was him or me), and Accident (someone died because of me, but I had no way of foreseeing or preventing it).

This is why Catholics are not forbidden to serve in the military, where killing is possible and possibly for many even likely, but where murder is never condoned. Not ever. (I’m a military mom. Do NOT get me started on the slander the Left spews about MY KIDS on this and other — e.g., torture — topics.)

Why does the Church teach that it is never permissible to murder?

God alone is Lord over life and death. Human life is sacred, because it belongs to God. It is His property. Therefore, an attack on human life is a sacrilege committed against God.

No right will be long guaranteed

What sorts of attacks on human life are forbidden by the Fifth Commandment?

  • Murder and acting as an accomplice to murder are forbidden.
  • Killing unarmed civilians during a war is forbidden.
  • The abortion of a human being, from the moment of conception on, is forbidden.
  • Suicide, self-mutilation, and self-destructive behavior are forbidden.
  • Euthanasia—killing the handicapped, the sick, and the dying—is also forbidden.

Today people often try to get around the Fifth Commandment with seemingly humane arguments. But neither euthanasia nor abortion is a humane solution. That is why the Church is perfectly clear on these questions. Whoever participates in an abortion, forces a woman to undergo an abortion, or merely advises her to do so is automatically excommunicated—just as with other crimes against human life. If a psychologically ill person commits suicide, responsibility for the act of killing is often diminished and in many cases completely annulled.

2 Comments

Filed under Abortion, Christianity, Euthanasia, Life Issues

Way to go, TEXAS!

July 3, 2013: The Texas House State Affairs Committee last night passed a bill to ban abortions in the state after 20 weeks of pregnancy and hold abortion facilities accountable for obeying basic health and safety standards. The last attempt to pass the bill was halted in the state Senate with a pro-abortion filibuster but state Sen. Wendy Davis says she will not filibuster the bill a second time.

http://www.lifenews.com/2013/07/03/texas-committee-passes-bill-to-ban-abortions-at-20-weeks/

Wendy’s supporters showed their deep commitment to “The Children” by forcing their kids to carry obscene signs proclaiming the their mommies would’ve happily murdered them in utero if they’d been inconvenient or imperfect. But that’s the Left. Abusing their children both before and after birth.

Pro Aborts abuse their kids after birth too

2013_06 Texas Democrats support murder by torture

Not your body

For the record: Dana Delany has been tweeting mega-props to Wendy Davis, so I will no longer be watching Body of Proof. “Props” is a jargon way to say Proper Recognition or Proper Respect Due. Commonly used with “to (someone).”

2 Comments

Filed under Abortion, Democrats, Life Issues

Who you calling a lump of cells?

If GOP did it, they'd call it genocide

Abortion tree shredder

war on blacks

death roe

Comments Off on Who you calling a lump of cells?

Filed under Life Issues

It’s a baby!

Contact your Senator

DEMOCRATS HYPOCRITES

At Planned Parenthood, they’ll tell you a preborn human being is just an undifferentiated lump of cells. But at this site, preborn human development is celebrated as the miracle it truly is. http://www.babycenter.com/fetal-development-week-by-week

15 Comments

Filed under Life Issues

One of those bizarre God stories

This is too good to just link to. Here’s the whole thing. Read it! You will be blessed!!

Adoptive Family Helps Raped Teen Whose Mom Pressured Her to Have Abortion

by Nancy Flanders | Washington, DC | LifeNews.com

Two weeks after giving birth to her second child, Julia Schoch received an email that would forever change her life. It was February, 2003, and she was at home recovering from a C-section with her husband, her two-year-old son, and her newborn daughter when her husband Andy told her she had an email that she needed to see immediately. It was from a friend who knew of a 13-year-old pregnant rape victim who needed help. It turned out that Julia was exactly the help this girl and her baby needed.

“It’s one of those kind of bizarre God stories,” explains Julia, “I’d been involved in pro-life stuff since high school, and I had monitored a message board for CBR [The Center for Bio-Ethical Reform]. I would come into contact with people who were post-abortive. In that, I met a woman who had an abortion at 18 weeks and five days, and I ended up becoming friends with her. Over two years of encouraging her and loving her, she finally felt ready to share her story. She was telling [that] story at a Campus Crusade for Christ event at her campus. In the audience, was a young woman who shared that her 13-year-old sister had been raped and was pregnant. Their mother was pressuring her to abort the baby. This girl was reaching out for help.”

Julia knew that if she asked this young girl, just an 8th grader, to go against her mother, she would need to make it a practical, realistic option. She immediately started praying that it was God’s plan for her to adopt this baby. Then, while she was nursing her daughter and praying about adopting, she realized Andy would think she was nuts. Adoption hadn’t been on their radar. They hadn’t ever researched it or budgeted any money for it. But just then, Andy walked into the room and told Julia that he wanted to adopt the baby.

“It was just that gut feeling that God gives you sometimes,” Julia explains.

Julia let her friend know that she and her husband wanted to adopt the baby, and then continued to pray. Finally, she heard back that the girl was willing to talk with her, so Julia, her friend, and the young girl – states away – chatted on the phone. Julia found out some disconcerting information. The girl had already gone to a clinic for an abortion.

She told Julia that she was at the abortion clinic for six hours, and that the clinic tested her for sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) and performed an ultrasound. However, they wouldn’t allow her to look at the ultrasound and didn’t inform her of the results of the STD tests. But that wasn’t the most astounding part.

The clinic informed her that she was 20 weeks pregnant, but that at 20 weeks, the baby wasn’t formed yet. That was lie number one. They went on to tell her that if she did have the baby, she wouldn’t survive labor because she was so young. That was lie number two. When the girl asked about adoption, the clinic told her that no one would want to adopt a “biracial, rapist’s baby.” That was lie number three.

Scared of dying while giving birth to a baby no one would want, the young girl and her mother consented to an abortion without being informed about the actual procedure. In addition, the price that had been quoted to her mother for the abortion included local anesthesia. Then the clinic discovered that the girl was 20 weeks along and would require a D&E (live dismemberment abortion) that would normally involve general anesthesia.

The mother hadn’t brought enough money to cover the additional fees, so the abortionist decided to proceed with the abortion using local anesthesia, leaving the girl awake for an abortion that would take about 20 minutes while she was dilated using metal rods (which can cause fertility problems).

“She was on the table, in stirrups and being dilated,” says Julia, “She was in so much pain and she was getting upset. She was so upset that the abortionist told the mother that the girl was making his job too difficult and advised the mother to come up with more money, reschedule, and come back so he could finish the abortion. In between the appointments is when I had the chance to talk to her.”

Knowing that this girl didn’t have an advocate and that one day she would find out that what the clinic had told her about her baby wasn’t true, Julie knew that the one thing she could do for this girl was to provide her with accurate information, and have her friend share her experience with her own second trimester abortion. These women told the girl to stand up for herself and to research everything that Julia was telling her. Julia told her that while other people would move on and forget about this baby, that as the mother, she would never forget about being pregnant with this child.

Soon after the phone call, Julia received word that on the morning of the rescheduled abortion, the girl told her mother that she wasn’t going through with it. A month later, Julia found out that the girl had chosen her and her husband to be the adoptive parents, which Julia calls an “incredible honor.”

At 23 weeks, the birth mother finally began receiving prenatal care and doctors told her she had chlamydia, something the abortion clinic never bothered to inform her of. The abortion clinic had left her uneducated about her own health regarding a disease that can cause sterility. If she had gone through with the abortion, she likely wouldn’t have found out she had chlamydia, and may have aborted the only child she would have ever been able to have.

During her pregnancy, Julia and her husband were able to meet the birth mother and chat about baby names. The birth mother invited Julia to be in the delivery room. Julia says:

“She asked us if we were thinking of names and if we would mind if she told us one she liked. Well, two weeks prior to meeting her, there was a girl at the park with a name we’d never heard before and we really liked it. [The birth mother] told us she liked the name Jaylyn. It was the same name we had chosen.”

When it was time for Jaylyn to be born, Julia, her husband, son and now six-month-old daughter drove out and spent 11 days in a Holiday Inn.

“It was wild,” explains Julia, “Both [babies] were nursing. It was just off the charts amazing.”

Today, Julia maintains a relationship with her daughter’s birth mother who is thriving thanks to some amazing people who rallied behind her. She began attending church as did her mother, and they are now both extremely pro-life. The birth mother has graduated from high school and gone on to pursue higher education.

“Personally, I think of this girl as a true hero,” says Julia, “because she not only went against her mom, but also enormous peer pressure & pressure from those in positions of authority – like the doctors in white coats. She had to be visibly pregnant walking the halls at school. Incredible courage. We believe she and birth mothers like her are the very definition of ‘mother’ – selfless love and sacrifice in action.”

Julia and her husband now have a total of six children. And despite the fact that they didn’t have the money to afford adopting Jaylyn, they trusted that God would be there.

“At the end of the month, when you’re paying the bills and you know you don’t have any more money coming in, God made sure our needs were met. We needed a $400 retainer fee for an attorney and I’m standing in my house like, ‘Lord, we don’t have $400.’ But if He wants us to do this, He’s going to figure it out. We’re going to do what He says and leave the details up to Him. I went to the mailbox and there was a check for $400 from the IRS for the George Bush child tax refund. And I was like, ‘Well, there it is’. It was stuff like that the whole time.”

Julia and her husband have since signed up to be foster-to-adopt parents, as have many of their church members and neighbors. Julia also founded Respond for Life, a group that connects people to resources available in the pro-life movement and opportunities for action against abortion. She educates people on abortion through training and public speaking and also works with Choices 4 Life as a speaker against abortion in cases of rape. She is a strong advocate for adoption, especially the adoption of children with special needs.

Julia says:

“Society tends to have a negative view of adoption. There is a misperception that adopted children are somehow inferior to biological children. I have found adoption to be an inexpressible blessing. A true miracle. I was able to more fully grasp God’s love for me through the adoption of my own daughter. My heart does not recognize a difference between her & my biological children. When we come to salvation in Christ, we are adopted as sons and daughters of God and He becomes our Father.”

Jaylyn is now nine years old and due to the abortion attempt, has some significant special needs and challenges that she will have for the rest of her life. She receives occupational therapy, speech therapy, and physical therapy.

“She’s definitely coming along,” says Julia, “She’s a worshipper! She doesn’t know how to sing quietly when we go to church. She prays and just cries. You ask her what she’s doing and she’ll tell you ‘praying for Daddy’ or whoever she is praying for with tears streaming down her face.”

Jaylyn also has a heart for special needs children and adults. Julia has watched her walk up and hold the hand of a young man whose fingers were deformed due to muscular dystrophy. Her best friend is an adopted little boy who is blind, mostly deaf, and in a wheelchair, due to being a victim of Shaken Baby Syndrome. He can hear the tone of Jaylyn’s voice, and she sings to him and makes him laugh. If the family is out and Jaylyn spots someone with Down syndrome, then that is who she wants to talk to or play with.

“It is so beautiful,” says Julia, “I’ve never seen anything like it. The parents are visibly moved to have their children unconditionally embraced. She makes them feel like they are the special people they are. Jaylyn’s a really special person.”

Comments Off on One of those bizarre God stories

Filed under Life Issues

Priests for Life issues Open Letter to Nancy Pelosi

If you go to http://www.priestsforlife.org/pelosi/, there is a button at the end of the letter to allow you to have an email sent to her office indicating that you, too, agree with the letter.

Tuesday, June 18, 2013

Dear Mrs. Pelosi,

Last Thursday, June 13, you were asked a question in a press briefing that you declined to answer. The question was, “What is the moral difference between what Dr. Gosnell did to a baby born alive at 23 weeks and aborting her moments before birth?”

Given the fact that the Gosnell case has been national news for months now, and that Congress, where you serve as House Democratic Leader, was about to have a vote on banning abortion after 20 weeks fetal age, this was a legitimate question.

Instead of even attempting to answer the question, you resorted to judgmental ad hominem attacks on the reporter who asked it, saying, “You obviously have an agenda. You’re not interested in having an answer.”

Mrs. Pelosi, the problem is that you’re not interested in giving an answer.

Your refusal to answer this question is consistent with your failure to provide an answer to a similar question from me and the members of my Priests for Life staff. Several years ago, we visited your office with the diagrams of dismemberment abortion at 23 weeks, and asked the simple question, “When you say the word ‘abortion,’ is this what you mean?” In response, nothing but silence has emanated from your office.

In what way is this refusal to address an issue of such national importance consistent with the leadership role you are supposed to be exercising? Public servants are supposed to be able to tell the difference between serving the public and killing the public. Apparently, you can’t. Otherwise, you would have been able to explain the difference between a legal medical procedure that kills a baby inside the womb and an act of murder — for which Dr. Gosnell is now serving life sentences — for killing the same baby outside the womb.

Moreover, you stated at the press briefing on June 13, “As a practicing and respectful Catholic, this is sacred ground to me when we talk about this. I don’t think it should have anything to do with politics.”

With this statement, you make a mockery of the Catholic faith and of the tens of millions of Americans who consider themselves “practicing and respectful Catholics” and who find the killing of children — whether inside or outside the womb — reprehensible.

You speak here of Catholic faith as if it is supposed to hide us from reality instead of lead us to face reality, as if it is supposed to confuse basic moral truths instead of clarify them, and as if it is supposed to help us escape the hard moral questions of life rather than help us confront them.

Whatever Catholic faith you claim to respect and practice, it is not the faith that the Catholic Church teaches. And I speak for countless Catholics when I say that it’s time for you to stop speaking as if it were.

Abortion is not sacred ground; it is sacrilegious ground. To imagine God giving the slightest approval to an act that dismembers a child he created is offensive to both faith and reason.

And to say that a question about the difference between a legal medical procedure and murder should not “have anything to do with politics” reveals a profound failure to understand your own political responsibilities, which start with the duty to secure the God-given right to life of every citizen.

Mrs. Pelosi, for decades you have gotten away with betraying and misrepresenting the Catholic faith as well as the responsibilities of public office. We have had enough of it. Either exercise your duties as a public servant and a Catholic, or have the honesty to formally renounce them.

Sincerely,

Fr. Frank Pavone

National Director, Priests for Life

The email option allows you to simply send the above or you can delete any or all of it and write your own. I doubt Mrs. Pelosi will ever see my email, but I wrote the text carefully anyway.

Subject line: Mrs. Pelosi, I am praying for your soul

When God calls you to your Final Judgment, He will not be interested in how you voted for food stamps so that other people could feed the poor (while you increased your personal fortune by millions).

What He will want to know is, “Where were you when I was in utero and people were pressuring my mom to have me aborted?”

I believe He will also want to know where you got off citing your Catholic faith and using the word “sacred” about your support for the cruel destruction of pain-capable and viable or near-viable fetuses.

Human life begins at conception and abortion is evil. The Catholic Church has taught this for millennia. Your support for abortion is bad enough; acting like you have a moral obligation to support it because you’re Catholic is pure sacrilege.

You’re past your four score and ten, ma’am. If I were you, I’d be thinking and praying hard about the rapidly approaching day when God Almighty will call you to account. All of your power and connections and millions are as filthy rags to Him. His judgment will be final and Heaven and Hell are eternal.

Comments Off on Priests for Life issues Open Letter to Nancy Pelosi

Filed under Abortion, Catholic Church, Kermit Gosnell, Life Issues, Nancy Pelosi