
From the ACLU web site:
“In 1978, the ACLU took a controversial stand for free speech by defending a neo-Nazi group that wanted to march through the Chicago suburb of Skokie , where many Holocaust survivors lived. The notoriety of the case caused some ACLU members to resign, but to many others the case has come to represent the ACLU’s unwavering commitment to principle. In fact, many of the laws the ACLU cited to defend the group’s right to free speech and assembly were the same laws it had invoked during the Civil Rights era, when Southern cities tried to shut down civil rights marches with similar claims about the violence and disruption the protests would cause. Although the ACLU prevailed in its free speech arguments, the neo-Nazi group never marched through Skokie, instead agreeing to stage a rally at Federal Plaza in downtown Chicago.”
Source:








Since you (or at least James Woods) asked:
ACLU defends Coulter after Berkeley speech cancellation
FWIWj
Coulter mocked them for the belatedness of their statement, though.
LikeLiked by 2 people
You beat me to it, mindful. 🙂
LikeLike
Maybe they were stung by Woods’ criticism. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
I hope so! It would show they still have a capacity for shame, which is a positive sign.
LikeLike