Category Archives: Christianity

Poverty of Spirit

For the record, while I agree with Zo’s economics, I do not agree with his interpretation of “blessed are the poor.”

Matthew 5:3 actually says: “Blessed are the poor in spirit, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.

It’s got nothing whatsoever to do with material wealth or lack thereof.

Jesus is saying here that those who are “poor in spirit” will be blessed by God with eternal life.

A pauper can be poor in spirit. Or not. Likewise a billionaire.

Poverty of SPIRIT is about knowing who one truly is in relation to God.

A Road Map for Spiritual Growth by Chrissy the Hyphenated
http://family.webshots.com/album/579321629VClmLM

1 Comment

Filed under Christianity

Ascension Thursday


Today we celebrate the completion of the work of our salvation, the pledge of our glorification with Christ, and His entry into heaven with our human nature glorified. It doesn’t get any better than that.

Comments Off on Ascension Thursday

Filed under Christianity

Intelligent Design is NOT Creationism

Until I imbibed the resources listed below, I was absolutely on board with the Catholic position on evolution, which is that there can be no conflict between science and faith, because God created everything.

My faith in and love for God are based on the same kinds of things that my faith in and love for my husband are based on. This is not to say that I ignore my mind in matters of the heart. I most decidedly do not. I did a very serious, intense, intellectual pursuit of all my Big Questions about God before I ever got close enough to be able to meet Him in person. I also dated for years before I met Dearest and had made a long list of things I wanted and did not want in a life mate.

After becoming a Born Again Christian at the age of 17, I read the Bible a lot, visited all kinds of churches, and hung out with many varieties of Christian believers. After a year or so, I felt a need to settle down into a faith community, so I asked God, “Where do you want me to worship, pray, learn and fellowship?” His answer was clear that, for me, it was the Roman Catholic Church.

I’ve had my differences and a few times really, really wanted to leave. Each time, He made it clear that this was His choice for me, so I’ve stuck it out. I have no illusions about my church’s short-comings, particularly in my liberal diocese in my liberal nation. Our official support for the Pro-Life movement has been sickeningly anemic and, until recently, some of the homilies and adult education programs in my parish have been based more on Democrat talking points than Church teaching or Scripture.

My point here is that Catholicism does not teach Creationism.

Pius XII’s 1950 encyclical Humani Generis (36–37) says we need not be hostile to modern cosmology.

http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/pius_xii/encyclicals/documents/hf_p-xii_enc_12081950_humani-generis_en.html

And the Catechism of the Catholic Church states,

“[M]any scientific studies . . . have splendidly enriched our knowledge of the age and dimensions of the cosmos, the development of life forms, and the appearance of man. These studies invite us to even greater admiration for the greatness of the Creator” (283).

http://www.kofc.org/un/catechism/index.action

I believe God gave us the Bible and it’s all true. But what kind of truth are we talking about? Consider, for example, that Catholics take literally what Jesus said about having to eat His Body, but most non-Catholic Christians do not.

With respect to the apparent conflict between the creation stories in Genesis and scientific evidence for things like dinosaurs and the Big Bang, I was taught that there is no conflict. Those chapters are not historical or scientific texts, but a specific type of literature called “mythic.” (And the Psalms and the Song of Songs are “poetry.”)

In this context, the word “myth” has a bigger, deeper meaning than the throw away use it gets in things like “urban myth.” In the latter, the point of the story is to convey some historical and/or scientific truth. Even here, the word “myth” doesn’t necessarily mean “false”, any more than “old wives tales” are always wrong.

Mythic literature is totally different. In this context, the historical and/or scientific elements of the story are not the point at all. It’s only the deeper philosophical, moral and/or theological messages that are meant to be taken as literally true. This kind of literature is what we get in Aesop’s Fables and other morality tales, including the Parables of Jesus.

Examples: Mythbusters could demonstrate scientifically that the quack of a duck does echo. But they could not disprove the moral of The Lion and the Mouse — “Even the weak and small may be of help to those much mightier than themselves” — by demonstrating that lions and mice cannot talk.

There are many creation myths out there, a number of them contemporaneous with our Genesis myth. They posit things like the existence of multiple gods or that the supernatural reality is impersonal or that only the spiritual is good, but the material is evil.

By contrast, our myth tells us that there is one and only one God who is personal, loving and all-good, that He created everything and made it all good, and that evil results from departing from His perfect will.

I’m not a Scripture scholar, so I really can’t go any further with this. If you believe differently, that’s fine with me. I’m not interested in proselytizing or arguing, only explaining what I believe, which so far as I know, is consistent with Catholic teaching.

My big point in belaboring the issue in this blog is to provide a context for why you can take my word that I had no stake whatsoever in the Darwin vs. Intelligent Design debate. I was perfectly comfortable with the Catholic position, “If Darwin is right, it’s because that is how God chose to do things.”

And it’s not just because I’m not a scientist. I have a very devout Catholic nephew who teaches Biology. He also has no problem with Darwin.

However, as much as I am not a scientist, I really enjoy anything about science, provided it is dumbed down enough for me to understand it. So, back when I was having my big epiphany about what a load of donkey doo most of my political assumptions were, I became intrigued by the Intelligent Design  movement. The more I learned, the more I wanted to learn. My personal favorite resources on the SCIENCE of Intelligent Design are:

Unlocking the Mystery of Life DVD
http://www.unlockingthemysteryoflife.com/

The Privileged Planet DVD
http://www.theprivilegedplanet.com/

Icons of Evolution, a SHORT book by Jonathan Wells
http://www.iconsofevolution.com/

Signature in the Cell: DNA and the Evidence for Design, a LONG book by Stephen C. Meyer
http://www.signatureinthecell.com/

At this point, I have no question whatsoever that Darwin’s theories are headed the same way that Freud’s went. Real scientists are finding more and more evidence within nature that points to the existence of an intelligent designer. It’s very exciting stuff.

If you enjoyed this, you might also like https://polination.wordpress.com/2012/05/03/censored/

12 Comments

Filed under Catholic Church, Christianity, Creation, Evolution, Science

What’s wrong with this picture?

Comments Off on What’s wrong with this picture?

Filed under Christianity

Church-goers are significantly happier

Click on graphic to embiggen.

Source: http://www.gallup.com/poll/153374/Churchgoers-Boast-Better-Mood-Especially-Sundays.aspx

3 Comments

Filed under Christianity

Occupy the Bible

Click on graphics to embiggen.

The fundamental error the Left makes in their social gospel is to equate wealth with morality.

The Bible has a lot to say about wealth, poverty and morality.

But the one thing the Bible does NOT do is make either wealth or poverty an outward sign of any person’s moral virtue or lack thereof.

The Left says having wealth is proof positive of an evil heart. But the Bible says that wealth is a blessing from God.

“Isaac planted crops in that land and the same year reaped a hundredfold, because the LORD blessed him.” ~Genesis 26:12

“The LORD blessed the latter part of Job’s life more than the first. He had fourteen thousand sheep, six thousand camels, a thousand yoke of oxen and a thousand donkeys.” ~Job 42:12

The Left says that anyone who works hard is a greedy, hateful bastard. But the Bible says that laziness is bad, saving and investing are good, and hard work is meant to bring profit.

“One who is slack in his work is a close relative of one who destroys.” ~Proverbs 18:9

“Lazy hands make a man poor, but diligent hands bring wealth. ~Proverbs 10:4

“A good man leaves an inheritance to his children’s children.” Proverbs 13:22

The Left says people who work for others are “wage slaves” and that people who benefit from the work of others are evil. The Bible says the opposite.

Anyone who does not take care of his own family “has denied the faith and is worse than an unbeliever.” ~1 Timothy 5:8

“King Solomon was greater in riches and wisdom than all the other kings of the earth.” ~2 Chronicles 9:22

And Jesus tells a parable in which he commends the two servants who worked to increase their master’s wealth, while condemning the one who refused to do so. (Luke 19:11-26)

The Left quotes “Blessed are the poor” from Jesus’ Sermon on the Mount to supposedly prove that the rich are bad and the poor are good. But Jesus did not say “Blessed are the poor.” He said,

“Blessed are the poor in spirit.” ~Matthew 5:3

The distinction is enormous. “The poor” are those who lack material wealth. “The poor in spirit” are those who know they need God (not the government).

Some point to Luke 18:18-20 as justification for their lionizing of the poor and condemnation of the wealthy. In this passage, we learn of a time when a wealthy ruler asked Jesus what he had to do to inherit eternal life.

Jesus recited the commandments … do not murder, do not commit adultery, etc. The man said he had always done those things.

Jesus then said, “You still lack one thing. Sell everything you have and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven. Then come, follow me.”

When the rich man heard this, “he became very sad, because he was a man of great wealth.”

Jesus looked at him and said, “How hard it is for the rich to enter the kingdom of God! Indeed, it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God.”

If rich people could never enter the Kingdom of God, it is easy to see why some assume this means all rich people are evil. But that interpretation makes no sense, since it would have to follow that when the Bible says God “blessed” Isaac and Job with wealth, he was giving them the very things that would keep them out of His Kingdom!

I was taught that the “eye of the needle” was a gate in Jerusalem that a loaded camel couldn’t fit through, but I read an article on-line that says there is no historical basis for this and that what makes more sense is that Jesus was simply employing hyperbole, which was a common teaching tool in Jewish communities.

I have to agree, since He does the same thing in at least two places in the Sermon on the Mount:

“If your right hand causes you to stumble, cut it off and throw it away.” ~Matthew 5:30

“Why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your brother’s eye and pay no attention to the log in your own eye?” ~Matthew 7:3

So, yes, Jesus did tell that one rich guy he had to give up all his worldly goods. But maybe that’s because that man was more attached to his stuff than he was to God.  After all, another teaching in the Sermon on the Mount is,

“You cannot serve both God and money.” ~Matthew 6:24

And Jesus did NOT tell Zacchaeus, another very rich man, that he had to give away all of his possessions to gain eternal life. When Zacchaeus declared,

“Here and now I give half of my possessions to the poor, and if I have cheated anybody out of anything, I will pay back four times the amount.” Jesus declared, “Today salvation has come to this house.” ~Luke 19:8-9

Obviously, wealth and poverty in and of themselves are morally neutral. Ditto, debt.

The Bible makes it clear that debt is something to avoid.

“The rich rule over the poor, and the borrower is servant to the lender.” ~Proverbs 22:7

But the Bible also says it is okay, sometimes even laudable, to lend. Surely, God would not tell us to participate in causing another to sin. However, if we do borrow, He definitely expects us to pay it all back!

“Give to the one who asks you, and do not turn away from the one who wants to borrow from you.” ~Matthew 5:42

“When a man … takes an oath to obligate himself by a pledge, he must not break his word but must do everything he said.” ~Numbers 30:2

The Left boasts a great many loud and mean-spirited people demanding free stuff. The Bible gives us St. Paul:

“I have learned to be content whatever the circumstances. I know what it is to be in need, and I know what it is to have plenty. I have learned the secret of being content in any and every situation, whether well fed or hungry, whether living in plenty or in want. I can do all this through him who gives me strength.” ~Philippians 4:11-13

Could the Government Gimme Occupying Lefties GET any further from God’s truths? 

Source:
http://www.gracecentered.com/what_the_Bible_says_about_money.htm
http://www.biblicalhebrew.com/nt/camelneedle.htm
http://christianpf.com/the-bible-and-debt/

3 Comments

Filed under Christianity

Catholicism vs Socialism

This was posted May 12, 2009 … nearly three years ago. Nothing that’s happened since then has changed any of it.

Comments Off on Catholicism vs Socialism

Filed under Catholic Church, Christianity, Socialism

My heart aches for God

Excerpt from an astonishingly beautiful essay called “On Being Made for Infinity”

“The problem I have with atheism, materialism and all the rest is not so much that they are false ideologies, as that they demand I be content with the limited. Our desire for beauty cannot be infinite, for an infinite desire constitutes an infinite satisfaction … Christ bled and died that we might have infinite love, infinite goodness, infinite beauty, and the infinite satisfaction of our hungry, pining hearts. We are to be infinitely fulfilled. We are meant for unimaginable ecstasy. Let us never cease to plunge the depths.”

Read the rest @
http://www.patheos.com/blogs/badcatholic/2012/02/on-being-made-for-infinity.html

3 Comments

Filed under Atheism, Christianity

St. Patrick’s Breastplate

I bind unto myself today
The strong Name of the Trinity,
By invocation of the same,
The Three in One and One in Three.

I bind this day to me for ever.
By power of faith, Christ’s incarnation;
His baptism in the Jordan river;
His death on Cross for my salvation;
His bursting from the spicèd tomb;
His riding up the heavenly way;
His coming at the day of doom;*
I bind unto myself today.

I bind unto myself the power
Of the great love of the cherubim;
The sweet ‘well done’ in judgment hour,
The service of the seraphim,
Confessors’ faith, Apostles’ word,
The Patriarchs’ prayers, the Prophets’ scrolls,
All good deeds done unto the Lord,
And purity of virgin souls.

I bind unto myself today
The virtues of the starlit heaven,
The glorious sun’s life-giving ray,
The whiteness of the moon at even,
The flashing of the lightning free,
The whirling wind’s tempestuous shocks,
The stable earth, the deep salt sea,
Around the old eternal rocks.

I bind unto myself today
The power of God to hold and lead,
His eye to watch, His might to stay,
His ear to hearken to my need.
The wisdom of my God to teach,
His hand to guide, His shield to ward,
The word of God to give me speech,
His heavenly host to be my guard.

Against the demon snares of sin,
The vice that gives temptation force,
The natural lusts that war within,
The hostile men that mar my course;
Or few or many, far or nigh,
In every place and in all hours,
Against their fierce hostility,
I bind to me these holy powers.

Against all Satan’s spells and wiles,
Against false words of heresy,
Against the knowledge that defiles,
Against the heart’s idolatry,
Against the wizard’s evil craft,
Against the death wound and the burning,
The choking wave and the poisoned shaft,
Protect me, Christ, till Thy returning.

Christ be with me, Christ within me,
Christ behind me, Christ before me,
Christ beside me, Christ to win me,
Christ to comfort and restore me.
Christ beneath me, Christ above me,
Christ in quiet, Christ in danger,
Christ in hearts of all that love me,
Christ in mouth of friend and stranger.

I bind unto myself the Name,
The strong Name of the Trinity;
By invocation of the same.
The Three in One, and One in Three,
Of Whom all nature hath creation,
Eternal Father, Spirit, Word:
Praise to the Lord of my salvation,
Salvation is of Christ the Lord.
_______________________________________
* Note: “day of doom” is an Old English term meaning “Day of Judgment.”
http://prayerfoundation.org/st_patricks_breastplate_prayer.htm

7 Comments

Filed under Christianity, Prayer

Why Lefties should not quote the Bible

Basically, it all boils down to, “They don’t understand it, so they always get it wrong.”

Case in point. When I was searching for imagery for https://polination.wordpress.com/2012/03/11/thou-shalt-not-murder/, I came across a photo of nekkid ladies protesting the war in Iraq.

Said peace protesting ladies are standing in a grassy field with big red letters painted on their backs spelling out, “Thou Shalt Not Kill!”

I think it’s safe to assume all nekkid protesters are left-wingnuts, what with them being in favor of anything they think will shock boring, bitter-clinging, right-wingnut types.

Thus, the question arises … would not these same individuals (who so pretentiously quote the Bible on behalf of their political agenda, while offending biblical proscriptions against giving scandal by parading around nekkid) be likely to also participate enthusiastically in pro-abort protests … you know the kind where ladies march along waving coat hangers and demanding that Bible-thumpers stop trying to stick their noses into other people’s wombs?

I’m just saying.

Another image from my search was @ http://friendlyatheist.tumblr.com/post/489381587/thou-shalt-not-kill-unless-god-tells-you-to.

Did you catch the name of the site? friendlyatheist. Yeah, right.

Sorry, pal, but I don’t consider taking Bible stuff out of context for the express purpose of sneering at my faith to be a “friendly” activity.

Why is it that atheists think they’re so smart anyway? Has it never crossed their teensy weensy minds that Hebrew and Christian believers have had THOUSANDS of YEARS to ponder all this stuff and that our greatest theologians have written a whole bunch on these issues? Duh.

Another Leftie Bible sneer was @ http://cheezburger.com/View/4466084096.

Actually, this cheezburger guy did a bunch of these. None of them had any artistic or theological merit, though I suppose making and posting them on the internet made him feel all over clever in a “Take that, you stupid Bible thumpers!” way.

So, cheezburger … when you get done making rude and immature noises with your mouth, could you give a thought or two to the important bit that comes shortly before “Thou shalt not kill” where God said,

“I am the Lord, your God.”

Hellooo! Rules made BY God do not apply TO God. Sheesh. I keep thinking of this funny bit Bill Cosby used to do:

“I brought you into this world and I can take you out.”

Honestly. Atheists can be so damn dumb. They remind me of teen-agers who think that all the rules that parents make for them should also apply to the parents, but any rules made for younger children should not apply to older children.

Like, bed times for example. Parents stay up as long as they want. Teens think they should also have that freedom … but if they have younger siblings (especially pesty ones), they should definitely have to go to bed by some certain, much-earlier-than-teen time.

On the plus side, in my graphics search, I came across this gem:

“Dr. Benjamin Spock said we shouldn’t spank our children when they misbehave, because their little personalities would be warped and we might damage their self-esteem We said an expert should know what he’s talking about. And we said okay. (Dr. Spock’s son committed suicide.)”  http://archian.wordpress.com/2010/12/01/logical-consequence-of-secularization-in-america/

It reminded me of Madalyn Murray O’Hair, founder of American Atheists and the person behind the 1963 SCOTUS decision in Murray v. Curlett lawsuit, that ended official Bible-reading in American public schools.

Her son William J. Murray became a Baptist in 1980. Upon learning this, his mother reportedly said, “I repudiate him entirely and completely for now and all times.” In 1995, Madalyn was kidnapped and murdered by one of her fellow American Atheist activists.

William is now the chairman of the Religious Freedom Coalition, a non-profit organization in Washington, D.C., that works to help Christians in Islamic and Communist nations.

I can’t wait to read his autobiography, My Life Without God. The customer reviews at Amazon make it sound so interesting!

[I don’t need to explain to all y’all that I’m not happy that Son of Spock or Madalyn the Hair came to violent ends, even if these events do happen to support my belief that living by the Bible is good for children and other living things.]

Sources:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Madalyn_Murray_O%27Hair
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_J._Murray
 http://www.amazon.com/Life-Without-God-William-Murray/dp/0840752563

8 Comments

Filed under Atheism, Christianity