Category Archives: Constitution

A few thoughts on Gun Control

Tweeted @ @marklevinshow:

Chicago has the toughest gun laws in Country. This year 446 school age children have been shot and 62 killed in Chicago!

Special kind of stupid

Tweeted @WilliamTeach:

Weird how Dems weren’t calling for gun control when Islamist went on a rampage at Ft. Hood

Liberal Second Amendment

The following is excerpted from http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/335987/gun-owners-segregationists-and-jim-sleeper-charles-c-w-cooke by Charles C.W. Cooke:

Anybody who bothers to look up 1857′s Dred Scott v. Sandford decision will notice right away the court’s awful observation that if slaves were permitted to enjoy full citizenship rights, then they would — shock horror! — enjoy the right

“to keep and carry arms wherever they went.”

This, the court thought, would be disastrous.

Gun control is racist

The fear of blacks with guns is not, of course, new. The very first gun-control measures in American history were designed to keep arms out of the hands of blacks and Indians:

The Massachusetts and Plymouth colonies both prohibited the sale of guns to Indians in the early seventeenth century, and the “Black Codes” of the mid-eighteenth century required French colonists in Louisiana to disarm and beat “any black carrying any potential weapon.”

Many pre-Civil War state constitutions went further, reserving the right to bear arms … to “freemen,” which, naturally, meant whites. After their damnable cause was lost, the KKK picked up and ran with disarmament as a way of keeping blacks down.

As Adam Winkler has observed, “gun control” was “at the very top of its agenda.” The Democratic party’s “Black Codes,” which barred former slaves from owning guns in the (segregated) post-bellum South, were passed for the same purpose.

It is no accident that the first draft of the 1871 Anti-Klan Act contained a provision that made it a federal crime to

“deprive any citizen of the United States of any arms or weapons he may have in his house or possession for the defense of his person, family, or property,”

for that was exactly what segregationists set out to do.

Robert Franklin Williams’s classic work, Negroes with Guns, tells a tale of the KKK’s systematic attempt to disarm black Americans — and of the National Rifle Association’s work in forming a counter-group called the “Black Armed Guard” — as late as the as the 1950s.

As Williams points out, it was guns in the hands of his family that saved their lives and allowed them — literally — to fight the KKK and their allies.

15 Comments

Filed under Constitution, Crime, Fort Hood Massacre, Government Tyranny, Gun Control, KKK, Law, Liberty, Race Relations, Second Amendment, Supreme Court

Shutting up Piers Morgan

2012_12 04 Morgan vs Roth on 2d Amendment

 

6 Comments

Filed under Constitution, Gun Control, Piers Morgan, Second Amendment

Obama’s hidden past

October 24, 2012: Billionaire Donald Trump offered Barack Obama a check for $5 million for his choice of charities if he would produce his college and passport records.

From the Desk of Donald Trump: Major Announcement [2:45]

November 1, 2012: Mr. Caring and Transparency ignored Trump’s offer. (I wonder how those calls to the White House for help with hurricane relief are going?)

In the video clip above, The Donald rightly claims that he is responsible for getting Obama to finally release his long-form birth certificate (or some faked up facsimile thereof).

Obama did this only under POLITICAL pressure that was damaging him personally.

But when Lt. Col. Terry Lakin asked to see proof that Obama had the Constitutional right to order him into harm’s way, Obama didn’t lift a finger, not even to keep the man out of prison.

The Terry Lakin case ranks at the top of scurvy, slimey, makes-my-hair-smolder-with-anger things Barack Obama has ever done.

Why Did Barack Obama Let Terry Lakin Go to Jail?

By Jack Cashill – July 5, 2012

http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/07/why_did_barack_obama_let_terry_lakin_go_to_jail.html

Former Lt. Col. Terry Lakin knows what despair feels like. He felt it full-bore on a late December day in 2010. Having been stripped of his rank, income, benefits, pension, and authority at court martial, this much-honored 17-year U.S. Army veteran was about to lose his freedom.

The good doctor had refused deployment to Afghanistan. He had been there before in his role as flight surgeon and would have been happy to go again. He had his bags packed and was ready to leave. All he asked from his commander-in-chief before boarding the plane was a sign, a nod to the constitutional niceties, a show of his birth certificate. It was not forthcoming.

Now, Lakin was on his way to Fort Leavenworth’s Joint Regional Correctional Facility. Of all his hardship deployments, Bosnia included, this would be the hardest. After he bid a tearful farewell to his wife and three young children, his military minders chained his hands together and attached those chains to a band around his waist. They chained his legs and attached those, too. They then loaded him into a van and drove him to Reagan National.

There, Lakin endured his ultimate humiliation: a seemingly endless perp walk — a shuffle really — through a concourse filled with flags and patriotic bunting and the happy sight of returning soldiers. None of the display had lost its appeal, but Lakin could not overlook the irony of his being chained and bound amidst it all.

The civilian psychologist who did intake assessments at Fort Leavenworth claimed to know why the soft-spoken doctor refused deployment, or at least he thought he did. As he put it, Lakin did not believe Obama to have been born in the United States or to be constitutionally eligible to be president.

Lakin corrected him. As he explained, he did not know where the president was born or whether the president was eligible. The problem was that no one did. As Lakin saw it, the oath that he took as an officer in the U.S. Army — “I, Terrence Lee Lakin, do solemnly swear that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic” — all but dictated that he seek the truth.

After exhausting all military channels, Lakin took the one honorable step that he thought would force the president to respond, even if it meant a court martial. The psychologist didn’t get it. He could not quite factor “honor” into a mental illness evaluation.

The White House, which was aware of Lakin’s ordeal, could have spared him imprisonment had the president done in April 2010 what he did in April 2011. Under pressure from Donald Trump, President Obama presented at least a facsimile of a birth certificate. At the churlish little press conference surrounding the event, Obama mocked those who had questioned him.

“We’re not going to be able to [address our problems] if we just make stuff up and pretend that facts are not facts,” said the president. “We’re not going to be able to solve our problems if we get distracted by sideshows and carnival barkers.”

Lakin watched this presentation on his cell block’s communal TV with dismay. After all he had sacrificed, the president considered him, if he considered him at all, as nothing more than a sideshow freak. That burned.

What burned even more was his later realization that Obama himself had been feeding the story that he was foreign-born. In May of this year, Lakin, like the rest of us, learned that Obama claimed a Kenyan birth in the bio distributed by his literary agent, Jane Dystel, in 1991.

From early on, no doubt, Barack Obama saw that it paid to be exotic. Foreign birth gave him a romantic allure and allowed him to distance himself from the bitter clingers of the country he barely deigned to inhabit.

“I chose my friends carefully,” Obama wrote in his memoir, Dreams from My Father: “The more politically active black students. The foreign students. The Chicanos. The Marxist professors and structural feminists and punk-rock performance poets.” These were the people with whom he felt comfortable.

Of course, a Kenyan birth would preclude his becoming president, but in 1991, Obama was not thinking that far ahead. He was likely thinking marketability. In the years that followed, various news services would repeat the Kenyan birth claim, and Obama’s stubborn refusal to show a birth certificate fed the Kenyan birth narrative that he himself had created.

At his April 2011 press conference, Obama chided those who “just make stuff up and pretend that facts are not facts,” but Lakin sensed even then there was no greater pretender than the president himself. Long before his court-martial, he knew that Obama’s origin’s story, the one on which he built his 2008 candidacy, was a fiction. There was no “improbable love,” no idyllic multicultural family. His parents never lived together. They did not even live in the same state.

It was not until the release of David Maraniss’ book, Barack Obama: The Story, in June 2012 that the media began to concede that the story Obama had been spinning all along was fabricated. Buzzfeed’s Ben Smith, an Obama supporter like Maraniss, “counted 38 instances in which the biographer convincingly disputes significant elements of Obama’s own story of his life and his family history.” By then, of course, it was too late for Terry Lakin. The media had paid little attention to his ordeal, and then only to belittle him.

Terry Lakin, now freed from prison and military obligations, has finally gotten his chance to set the record straight. His memoir, Officer’s Oath, on which I collaborated, is available for purchase.

In this memoir, unlike Dreams, there are no composite characters, no fabrications, no deceptions. I am hoping that the psychologist who assessed Terry will read it. If he does, he will no longer ask why Lt. Col. Lakin did what he did, but rather why others who had sworn to defend the Constitution — Congress included — did not do the same.

Sources:

http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/07/why_did_barack_obama_let_terry_lakin_go_to_jail.html

http://officersoath.com/

Kaboom! Trump drops Obama bombshell

Trump: Obama snub proves foreign birth

6 Comments

Filed under Armed Forces, Barack Obama, Constitution, Donald Trump

The Morality of Voting for an Imperfect Candidate

There is a principle in Moral Theology — the principle of double effect — which, under certain clearly defined conditions, permits us to perform an act that has both a good and an evil effect. In order for that act to be a moral choice, it must meet all four of the following conditions:

1. The act itself must be good or indifferent.

2. The good effect must not be caused by the evil effect.

3. The good effect and not the evil effect must be directly intended by the agent.

4. The good must outweigh the evil.

The Founding Fathers, by drafting, ratifying and implementing the Constitution of the United States, engaged in the most monumental example in American history of deliberately choosing what is commonly called “the lesser of two evils.”

These courageous and devout Christian statesmen consciously, deliberately, purposefully chose to accommodate slavery – in fact, to constitutionally protect it for the next two decades – in the newly independent United States of America.

Slavery is evil. The founders knew this. They could have proclaimed with righteous indignation, “Slavery is evil, and we refuse to enshrine it in our new Constitution.”

That, of course, would have been the end of the convention as the Southern states would have bolted immediately, and the young nation’s slide into chaos would have continued unabated.

Next Tuesday, some feel they face a similar dilemma. They see flaws in the Romney/Ryan ticket and wonder if they can, in good conscience, vote for flawed candidates.

Moral theology says yes. I think Scripture says yes, too. God picked David to be King of Israel, right? He was hardly perfect. Look how that whole Bathsheba thing turned out.

Every citizen has only one of four choices:

A. Vote for Obama/Biden;

B. Vote for Romney/Ryan;

C. Vote for somebody else who hasn’t got a chance;

D. Not vote.

Each person has to check these against the list above. And don’t try to kid yourself that somehow C and/or D are superior choices simply because they let you stick your nose in the air whenever the next president screws up and sniff about how YOU didn’t vote for him.

Plus, you better be very sure that is NOT why you are tempted to choose C and/or D. Because if it is, your choice fails the moral stink test big time.

There is a famous saying, “All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.”

It’s not the evil people who are examining their consciences and scouring Scripture for guidance about God’s will concerning this election. It’s the good ones! Therefore, C and/or D are choices for “good men to do nothing” which, by elimination, is a choice to allow evil where you have the power to prevent it.

Personally, I think Moral Theology allows only one choice, which is to get your butt to the polls and vote for Romney/Ryan, lest the light of liberty be extinguished by four more years of a president so awful that he makes the paranoia of Nixon, the appeasement of Carter and the moral degradation of Clinton all rolled up together look kinda not so bad.

But that’s just me.

Sources:

http://catholicism.org/lesser-of-two-evils.html

Beware the ‘lesser-of-two-evils’ trap

12 Comments

Filed under Barack Obama, Constitution, Elections, Mitt Romney

Officer’s Oath

book

Officer’s Oath by Terry Lakin – Now available and ON SALE (half off) here

http://superstore.wnd.com/books/Officers-Oath-Paperback

Terry Lakin tells how his military vow to defend the Constitution demanded that he sacrifice his military career.

I have touched on Terry’s story twice in Chrissy’s Site Bites:

November 11, 2010

April 27, 2011

 

Comments Off on Officer’s Oath

Filed under Armed Forces, Constitution

Vote Him Out!

“GET OUT” by Ryan Bomberger/SoOutLoud.com [1:53]

Ryan Bomberger, creator of this catchy animated music video, is a black pro-life advocate, an avid writer and conservative who upholds famed orator Frederick Douglass (a Republican) as a profound source of inspiration.

“I’m as black as Obama, and I’m tired of any legitimate criticism of the President’s policy reduced to ludicrous charges of racism,” he said. “Obama and the Democrat party have been recklessly defying our Constitution with a whole lot of hope and change that most Americans do not want.”

“It’s our duty to hold our government accountable. Both parties are guilty of diminishing the Constitution with thousands of pieces of legislation that only put layers of separation between Americans and our guaranteed Constitutional liberties,” Bomberger said.

“The Democrats — the party of slavery, Jim Crow laws, anti-women’s suffrage movement, the KKK, abortion, and generational welfare – is also the party of reconstruction as it dangerously dismantles the Constitution. This video just says out loud what many others are feeling.”

See more at http://www.SoOutLoud.com

Source @ http://www.lifenews.com/2012/07/10/new-pro-life-music-video-tells-obama-to-get-out/

Comments Off on Vote Him Out!

Filed under Barack Obama, Constitution, Democrats, Race Relations

This IS the difference between the Left and the Right

“Those Voices Don’t Speak for the Rest of Us” [2:18]

Chrissy’s Site Bites @ http://news.webshots.com/photo/2505241110056011884cNZrZd

If you liked this, you might also enjoy https://polination.wordpress.com/2012/01/06/america-is/

H/t Bob and RedPill.

Comments Off on This IS the difference between the Left and the Right

Filed under Constitution, Liberty, Ronald Reagan, Tea Party

BHO cuts AZ from the herd

Click on graphics to embiggen.

The Obama Administration has been spinning the Arizona SCOTUS case as a question of state vs. federal jurisdictions. But clearly it was never anything of the kind. Arizona never tried to make any state laws that contradicted federal laws. They tried to make state laws that would allow them to enforce federal laws that federal officials were not enforcing.

Now that the Supreme Court has unanimously supported Arizona’s right to do this, the Obama administration is doubling down on the whole not-enforcing-the-law thing. Basically, it’s a giant neener neener from the Obama White House to the Supreme Court, the governor, legislators and citizens of Arizona, all of whom overwhelming supported the law.

The Obama Administration treats North Korea and Iran better than this.

Chrissy’s Site Bites @ http://news.webshots.com/photo/2483273070056011884HJdohs

Chrissy’s Site Bites @ http://news.webshots.com/photo/2875390860056011884JmHVev

I like the “overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution” part.

Chrissy’s Site Bites @ http://news.webshots.com/photo/2641220440056011884aUkZIn

The law that Obama the “Constitutional Scholar” declared “Poorly Conceived” is the one the Supreme Court just unanimously upheld.

Chrissy’s Site Bites @ http://news.webshots.com/photo/2692224080056011884LruhNu

Chrissy’s Site Bites @ http://news.webshots.com/photo/2093060160056011884gCbgxd

If you like this, you might also enjoy @ https://polination.wordpress.com/2012/04/04/obama-lies-like-a-rug/

H/t to Pete for source @ http://news.investors.com/article/616095/201206251907/obama-administration-exacts-revenge-on-arizona-for-winning-court-ruling.htm

4 Comments

Filed under Barack Obama, Constitution, Immigration, IRS, Law, Supreme Court

The Journalistic Establishment’s latest violation of public trust

Chrissy’s Site Bites @ http://news.webshots.com/photo/2286923270056011884aucbok

Click on graphic to embiggen.

After you sign the petition below (it’s free), please forward this to all of your patriotic friends and family, share it on your social networks, and remind people that freedom of religion was the first right guaranteed to us in our Constitution.

Petition @ http://www.mrcaction.org/action/586

“As a citizen and a patriot, I demand an end to the media’s obvious misleading of the public regarding what this mandate means for religious freedom in our country. I also call upon the media to fully report on the massive backlash this mandate has brought about.”

If you like this, you might also enjoy @ https://polination.wordpress.com/2012/05/16/newsweeks-gaylo-cover/

5 Comments

Filed under Barack Obama, Catholic Church, Constitution, First Amendment, Media Bias, Obamacare, Religious Liberty

Hare didn’t care

Chrissy’s Site Bites: http://news.webshots.com/photo/2271805700056011884ajIQEB

Click on graphic to embiggen.

In the video, Hare claims to have read the bill multiple time. He is challenged on that score with a little math. The bill is 2,700 pages long. Calculating a minute per page to read and comprehend, just one reading would take 45 hours. Multiple readings? Puh-leeze.

Hare also could not specify where in the Constitution it gave Congress the right to force people to buy products they don’t want. The Constitution is 6 pages long.

Even the Supreme Court justices who are considering its constitutionality are loathe to actually READ the whole of the so-called Affordable Care Act.

After a lawyer suggested the justices might go through the bill and decide which parts were constitutional, Justice Scalia said, “You really want us to go through these 2,700 pages? And do you really expect the court to do that? What happened to the Eight Amendment?” (The Eight Amendment prohibits cruel and unusual punishment.)

If you liked this, you might also enjoy:
https://polination.wordpress.com/2012/03/23/kagan-refusing-to-recuse-on-obamacare/

4 Comments

Filed under Constitution, Democrats, Elections, Obamacare, Republicans, Supreme Court, Tea Party