Category Archives: U.S. Senate

Defund Obamacare!

IF the government gets shut down over this, it will be because OBAMA and REID force it. The majority in the House voted to fund all government activities EXCEPT OBAMACARE. The Senate was NOT ALLOWED TO VOTE because DEMOCRAT MAJORITY LEADER SENATOR HARRY REID would not PERMIT IT. When Obama says Republicans want to shut down government, he’s LYING.

September 23, 2013 RASMUSSEN Poll on Obamacare

Do you believe this law will improve, worsen or have no impact on the nation’s health care system?

Improve 30% vs. Worsen 51% vs. Same 11% vs. Don’t know 8%

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/healthcare/health_care_law

Sen. Cruz Reading a Few Letters from Those Impacted by Obamacare to #MakeDCListen [7:26]

Defund it

He exempted his buds

THIS next one is long, but it’s SO GOOD. You don’t need to watch, just listen. So clean or something. And listen.

Sen. Paul Joins Sen. Cruz on Defunding Obamacare- September 24, 2013 [15:05]

Cruz DC doesn't listen

Congress should pay

Comments Off on Defund Obamacare!

Filed under Barack Obama, Harry Reid, Obamacare, Polls, Rand Paul, Ted Cruz, U.S. Senate

Democrats say NO to investigating Benghazi

2013_09 11 Dems say no to investigating Benghazi

Source:

http://www.cruz.senate.gov/record.cfm?id=345705

1 Comment

Filed under Benghazi, Democrats, Ted Cruz, U.S. Senate

Democrats rush to war

Who is rushing

Senate Democratic leadership seem determined to toss aside Senate rules in its rush to cover Obama’s Morsi-supporting, Muslim Brotherhood arming, red line drawing backside.

September 4, 2013: The Senate Foreign Relations Committee narrowly approved a modified war resolution (10–7) with one member, Sen. Ed Markey (D-MA), voting present.

September 9, 2013: Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) is poised to bring the measure to the floor, then put the vote to the full Senate as soon as Wednesday, September 11, 2013.

AQ thanks you

According to Senate rules, hearings should be notified seven days in advance, business meetings should be notified at least three days in advance, and members should have 24 hours to consider legislative text before having to vote on it.

Not to mention that this coming Wednesday is the anniversary of the lethal 9/11 assaults on the World Trade Center, the Pentagon, United Airlines Flight 93, and our embassy in Benghazi which were all perpetrated by the anti-American, Muslim extremists Obama has been funding, arming and is determined to send our troops to support in Syria.

9-11 vote

Source:

Senate Breaks Own Rules in Rush to Vote on Syria War by Josh Rogin – Sep 4, 2013

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/09/04/senate-breaks-own-rules-in-rush-to-vote-on-syria-war.html

2 Comments

Filed under 9/11, Al Qaeda, Barack Obama, Democrats, George W. Bush, Harry Reid, Iraq, Muslim Brotherhood, Syria, U.S. Senate, United Nations

“Phony” scandals?

Please lecture us about phony scandals

No matter how “phony” Obama may believe the Benghazi, IRS, (etc. etc. etc.) scandals are or how biased his lapdog media is in reporting on them, the American public can tell that Democrats are doing a crap job in Washington.

Before the federal government can pass a law, it must be passed by both the House of Representatives and the Senate, then signed by the President. At any given time, 2/3 or 3/3 are controlled by either Republicans or Democrats. The dominant controlling party obviously has the most power over what laws get passed and thus bears the majority of the responsibility for how well the government serves the people.

As you can see from this graphic, trust in government has been strongly correlated with which party this is. When Democrats have been in control, trust has fallen and distrust has risen. When Republicans have been in control, the opposite has been true.

Note: The dominant 2/3 or 3/3 party is in pale colors under the poll results. The breakdown is in dark colors at the bottom.

GALLUP Trust in federal government

1 Comment

Filed under Barack Obama, Benghazi, Democrats, IRS, Republicans, U.S. Congress, U.S. Senate

MSNBC: Not a real news source

Once again, Chris Matthews has demonstrated his complete lack of functioning brain matter by declaring, “We don’t have any African-Americans in the United States Senate.”

Actually, we have two: Republican Senator Timothy Scott and Democrat Senator William Cowan.

2013 - two black US Senators Scott and Cowan

It is true that both were appointed to fill vacant seats, not elected, but Matthews doesn’t make the distinction.

And it’s not like they were appointed last week, so maybe he missed the news. Oh wait. He is a newscaster. And he specializes in national politics. So even if they were appointed last week, he should be right on top of it.

So can anyone explain to me how he did NOT know that two blacks have been sitting in the U.S. Senate since January and February, respectively?

Besides the obvious fact that Obama Worship turns a person’s brain to soup, I mean.

Comments Off on MSNBC: Not a real news source

Filed under Chris Matthews, News Media, U.S. Senate

The Malignant Narcissist in the White House

2013_04 Obama's pissy puss

2013_04 17 Obama shows anger

ALLAHPUNDIT SAYS,

Never mind Benghazi. Where was this supposedly righteous anger after Aurora? The victims in that case weren’t small children, but that can’t possibly explain O’s dramatically more subdued reaction after that shooting. They were innocent people too; many of them were young, if not kindergarteners. No angry Rose Garden press conferences freaking out about Senate inaction after Aurora, though. Any theories why? Anything, maybe, having to do with when that shooting happened vis-a-vis Newtown? Right: One of them came three months before a presidential election and the other came a month after. That’s the difference. As you watch him point the finger here at supposedly gutless senators who care more about retaining public office than Doing Something, remember that there’s hardly one among them who’s as attuned to political self-preservation as O. He kept his mouth shut nice and tight about guns when it was his own ass on the line last year in purple states; he ignored gun control almost completely when he had 60 Democratic votes in the Senate early in his first term; and as we know from the gay-marriage farce, he isn’t above lying outright to voters about his true positions in the name of getting elected. (Let’s not start on the many ways he’s followed Bush’s counterterrorism lead after selling himself to the left in ’08 as the anti-Bush on foreign policy.)

Given his record, there’s every reason to believe that what’s really bothering him is the fact that red-state Dems denied him an easy chance today to demagogue Republicans as the party of child murder or whatever, which he was hoping to use next year as a way to retake the House. Then, once he had a Democratic Congress again, he could pass some new horrible permutation of ObamaCare or immigration or the minimum wage or some other liberal wishlist item that has nothing to do with gun control. Just like in his first term! That’s what he’s mad about, that a political bludgeon was essentially taken out of his hands before he had a chance to use it to achieve unrelated goals.

And now he’s a lame duck, with few opportunities to pass something big and a real chance that he’ll end up with a fully Republican Congress in 2015. He might have no choice at this point but to try to tank the immigration bill too so that he’s got something to scream about next year. I wonder if Democrats will trip him up there too.

http://hotair.com/archives/2013/04/17/video-obama-not-handling-gun-control-failure-in-senate-very-well/

Also worth a look:

WSJ editorial about why keeping guns away from dangerous or unstable people was less important to Dems than defeating the NRA.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324493704578430672176449846.html

Tweets:

  • So it took 1,000 cops & 200 shots to bring 1 bomber down & UR telling me I don’t need more than 10 rounds?
  • Who in Boston is saying “Thank God I’m not allowed to own a gun” right now?
  • Obama, ask your mentor, Jeremiah Wright, if he thinks the chickens have come home to roost for Boston.
  • Maybe he meant Chechens.
  • Note when something’s already accomplished the president speaks of “I” (I directed resources), but when it’s yet-unaccomplished it’s “We”

Obama cries like a little girl

Comments Off on The Malignant Narcissist in the White House

Filed under Barack Obama, Boston Marathon Bombing, Democrats, Gun Control, Newtown, Republicans, U.S. Congress, U.S. Senate

The Traitors in the Senate

Last month, the U.S. Senate barely passed an amendment to protect our Second Amendment rights from an anti-gun-rights United Nations treaty.

2013_03 23 Amendment to uphold 2d Amendment against UN incursion

Before taking office, every Senator took an oath to protect and defend the Constitution.

Senators must swear before taking office

Every Senator who voted AGAINST this amendment is a hypocrite and a traitor.

  • Hypocrite: A person who acts in contradiction to his or her stated beliefs.

  • Traitor: A person who betrays a trust or is false to an obligation or duty.

2013_03 23 The Senate Traitor List

If you don’t like something that’s in the Constitution, we have a legal means for amending it. But so long as it says we have a right to bear arms, then Senators who take an oath to protect that right have no business voting to give it away.

Even if you hate guns, you should be concerned that 46 U.S. Senators were so ready and willing to give away one of our constitutional rights, because one right is as easy to snatch as another.

Surely there are some rights you DO care about. If they take guns away, what will be next? Freedom of the press? Freedom to peaceably assemble? Freedom of speech? Freedom to worship or not, as you choose? Freedom to own property? Freedom to travel where we want?

Lincoln overthrow those who would pervert Constitution

Source:

2 Comments

Filed under Abraham Lincoln, Constitution, Second Amendment, U.S. Senate

Does your country have the right to kill you?

2012_03 06 Wyden filibuster

Senator Rand Paul: White House issues answer after Senator’s 13-hour speech

http://www.paul.senate.gov/?p=press_release&id=735

Mar 7, 2013

Today, following a historic 13-hour filibuster on the Senate floor that ended early this morning, Sen. Rand Paul received correspondence from the White House regarding the legality and constitutionality of the U.S. government using lethal force, including drone strikes, on Americans and in U.S. territory. Sen. Paul’s repeated correspondence to President Obama’s nominee to be CIA director, John Brennan, was finally answered today, in part, with the following response from Attorney General Eric Holder: “‘Does the President have the authority to use a weaponized drone to kill an American not engaged in combat on American soil?’ The answer to that question is no.”

“This is a major victory for American civil liberties and ensures the protection of our basic Constitutional rights. We have Separation of Powers to protect our rights. That’s what government was organized to do and that’s what the Constitution was put in place to do,” Sen. Paul said. “I would like to congratulate my fellow colleagues in both the House and Senate and thank them for joining me in protecting the rights of due process.”

Sadly, the die-hards on the Left don’t agree. Or, at least, as long as their messiah is in charge, they don’t agree. If a Republican were in the White House, their hair would be on fire over the idea of a drone targeting an American citizen on American soil.

2013_03 07 The kind of people who watch MSNBC

4 Comments

Filed under Media Bias, Rand Paul, U.S. Senate

Child hookers, financial oopsies and a promotion

Melgen & Menendez

This week, the FBI raided the medical office of West Palm Beach eye doctor, Salomon Melgen. Melgen’s lawyer says the FBI hasn’t told them why, but IRS records show Melgen owes $11.1 million in 2006 taxes. A previous IRS lien for $6.2 million was released in 2011. And I thought paying taxes was supposed to be patriotic and, you know, charitable.

Melgen is a major contributor to New Jersey Democratic Senator Robert Menendez. Last fall, the Daily Caller reported that Menendez had accepted free rides on Melgen’s private jet to visit Melgen’s palatial estate in the Dominican Republic, where Melgen allegedly provided the Senator with underage Dominican prostitutes. (Word on the street is Menendez likes ’em young.)

Menendez’s office says this is all a “politically motivated right-wing blog” lie. Funny thing though, how shortly after the Daily Caller broke their story, Menendez SUDDENLY paid Melgen $58,000 for those plane trips. When asked why it took three YEARS for them to remember to properly pay for these trips, his Chief of Staff just said OOPS. It was merely “an oversight.” Amazing how often those silly things happen, isn’t it?

Speaking of silly things … guess who the Democrats promoted to be the new chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee?

Senator Robert Menendez.

Promoting someone who has pending allegations of using child prostitutes and taking undeclared campaign contributions from a tax scofflaw?

SOP for today’s Democratic Party.

Sources:

Feb. 1, 2013 – Salomon Melgen’s Lawyer Says FBI Won’t Say Why It Raided His Office

http://blogs.browardpalmbeach.com/pulp/2013/02/salomon_melgens_lawyer_says_fb.php

1 Comment

Filed under Democrats, Government Corruption, U.S. Senate

Harry Reid, REALLY?!

5 Comments

by | November 19, 2012 · 9:27 am