Proof that Republicans are NICER than Democrats

Looking at the 16 point jump from Obama’s 2008 popular vote and his inauguration week approvals got me wondering if disappointed presidential voters traditionally give a big old Atta Boy to the new president they didn’t want.

So I did a historical search and ranked the results by the size of the Atta Boy, then colored them by party. Note: I ignored second term election/inauguration stats, because I only wanted to see how disappointed voters responded to a relatively unknown new president.

What you’ll see below is that Atta Boys have been highest when a DEMOCRAT won and lowest when a REPUBLICAN won. In other words, disappointed Republicans have been significantly MORE willing to accept and cheer on a new Democrat president than Democrats have been willing to accept and cheer on a new Republican president.

REPUBLICANS are nicer than DEMOCRATS

Sources:

2 Comments

Filed under Democrats, Republicans

2 responses to “Proof that Republicans are NICER than Democrats

  1. I was pondering the +22 for JFK and am wondering how much of that was the slobbering media and how much was the American immigrant gestalt. Obama got a LOT of goodwill because he was the First Black President. Kennedy was the First Catholic President. I think a lot of Americans take real pride in seeing immigrant groups succeed, you know?

    Like

  2. My FOX daily update email has the Real Clear Politics Averages:

    Obama Job Approval: Approve 43.4% vs. Disapprove 51.9%

    Direction of Country: Right 22.2% vs. Wrong 70.9%

    Like