Category Archives: HHS

Biden lied. Bishops cried FOUL.

THE ACTUAL FACTS:

  • The HHS mandate contains a narrow, four-part exemption for certain “religious employers.”
  • That exemption does NOT extend to “Catholic social services, Georgetown hospital, Mercy hospital, any hospital,” or any other religious charity that offers its services to all, regardless of the faith of those served.
  • The HHS “accommodation” for “non-exempt” religious organizations like these does not even potentially relieve these organizations from the obligation “to pay for contraception” and “to be a vehicle to get contraception.”

Sources:

The USCCB Responds – October 12, 2012

http://www.usccb.org/news/2012/12-163.cfm

For more details, please see USCCB’s regulatory comments filed on May 15 regarding the proposed “accommodation.”

www.usccb.org/about/general-counsel/rulemaking/upload/comments-on-advance-notice-of-proposed-rulemaking-on-preventive-services-12-05-15.pdf

Comments Off on Biden lied. Bishops cried FOUL.

Filed under Catholic Church, HHS, Joe Biden, Obamacare

Majority oppose HHS mandate

Click on graphic to embiggen.

Source

Poll: Majority of Americans Oppose Obama Abortion-HHS Mandate

1 Comment

Filed under Abortion, HHS, Obamacare

Yes, they really do serve Satan

It is one short step from forcing us to pay for birth control to forcing us to pay for abortions, sex change operations and who knows whatever else atheistic Leftists decide will most offend God. In Germany, they have already outlawed circumcision.

Did you see the booing and shouting on the floor of the Democrat’s convention over restoring God and Jerusalem to the platform? Is there really ANY question any more who Obama Democrats are really working for?

Chrissy’s Site Bites @ http://news.webshots.com/photo/2693314990056011884ZakXfC

Click on graphic to embiggen.

If you like this, you might also want to read @ https://polination.wordpress.com/2012/08/14/the-evil-just-keeps-on-coming/

Source:

http://www.wnd.com/2012/09/obama-lawyers-govt-can-require-what-religion-forbids/

5 Comments

Filed under Abortion, Barack Obama, Catholic Church, Democrats, HHS, Obamacare, Religious Liberty

Obama holds second Cabinet meeting of 2012

Click on graphics to embiggen.

Chrissy’s Site Bites @ http://news.webshots.com/photo/2261774110056011884RQhqqc

The purpose of the Cabinet is both to advise the President and to rein in any attempts by him to abuse his power. Reagan and George W. Bush each met with their Cabinets 36 times in their first year alone.

Obama has convened his Cabinet only twice in the past 8 months. He has met individually with his Secretaries of Defense (18), Treasury (15), and State (14), plus one meeting each with Agriculture and Veterans Affairs. But he has not sat down with the other ten at all.

Some of these omissions are particularly puzzling.

How could he not meet with Attorney General Eric H. Holder even once during all that time Congress had Holder on the hot seat, then voted to hold him in contempt? And where did he get the nerve to grant Holder “executive privilege” when they hadn’t even talked?

Gas prices are still killing us all, at the pumps and in higher prices for everything that gets shipped anywhere, which is pretty much everything. Yet Obama never once met with his Secretary of Energy.

He also never met with his Secretaries of Commerce or Labor, despite record-high unemployment and record-low economic growth.

And did someone call off that terrorist threat thing? Obama never met with his Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano.

He also never met with Kathleen Sebelius, his Secretary of Health and Human Services and the author of the HHS mandate that has led to dozens of lawsuits and a revolt among formerly loyal-to-Democrats Catholics.

It’s easy to see where his priorities lie.

Chrissy’s Site Bites @ http://news.webshots.com/photo/2016565770056011884eJybeY

Even when he works, he doesn’t work!

Chrissy’s Site Bites @ http://news.webshots.com/photo/2340349730056011884WGxTfc

Sources:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/President%27s_Cabinet

http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/obama-holds-first-cabinet-meeting-january_648993.html

http://usgovinfo.about.com/od/thepresidentandcabinet/a/prescababout.htm

http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=1YVKAAAAIBAJ&sjid=EZQMAAAAIBAJ&pg=6749%2C1745890

http://www.whitehouse.gov/schedule/president/2012-01 etc.

2 Comments

Filed under Barack Obama, Democrats, Economy, Eric Holder, HHS, Janet Napolitano, Kathleen Sebelius, Unemployment

Some good news for our side

I just finished scoping out four opinion polls about the HHS mandate that date from February, March, May and June of this year. For those who want it, the data and URLs are provided below. But first, here are my thoughts.

A May poll of Adult Americans showed a very high degree of passion and support for freedom of religion above all else. It’s very rare to get a ZERO in the Meh crowd. [Meh = Don’t Know, No Opinion, It Depends.] But that’s what this poll found when they asked,

“Should freedom of religion be protected, even if it conflicts with other laws?”

26% No vs. 74% Yes vs. 0% Meh.

Clearly, as a nation, we really care about religious freedom. I have seen this 1:3 split in other polls on hot issues, including in another question from that same May poll.

“Is it morally wrong to force health care workers and doctors to provide abortion when they object for religious reasons?”

27% No vs. 72% Yes vs. 1% Meh.

I believe the 1:3 reflects the Hard-Left vs. Center-Right divide in America today. The Democrat Media Complex blats about how they are the majority and we are the extremist fringey tinfoil hatters. But the real truth is the opposite.

This is something to keep in mind when talking to those critical Undecided voters. The Hard-Leftists are already committed to the Democrats, so the likelihood that an Undecided is fundamentally Center-Right on most issues is very, very high. Find their hot buttons and focus on how Obama Democrats have violated those core values.

I saw another phenomenon in the May poll that I’ve seen before. Despite 74% of these same people saying they supported freedom of religion above all else, when the questions got specific about birth control, abortion, etc., support for the primacy of religious freedom dropped to between 51% and 58%.

But it shouldn’t have mattered whether the question was “Does religious freedom trump everything?” or “Does religious freedom trump this, that or the other thing?” Everything should mean everything, right? Except apparently it didn’t for about one-third of the people who said it did.

I see the same disconnect in presidential approval polls. When the question is “Do you approve of the job Obama is doing?”, the numbers are always higher than they are for subordinate issues, like “Do you approve of the job Obama is doing on the economy?” or “the war in Afghanistan?” etc.

The best explanation I can come up with is that people weenie out on reporting their real opinions when there is a hot button issue in the question. The Democrat Media Complex hounds us with certain messages about what it means to be a “good” person. Like, “If you don’t like Barack Obama, you’re a dirty RAAAAACIST!!!” And “If you don’t support birth control, you HATE WOMEN!!!” So the poll questions that include a culturally-charged anxiety trigger get a less honest answer than one that homes in on a core value.

It could be the other way around. I.e., that these people are all for religious freedom as long as it doesn’t interfere with them getting free stuff. I hope not. Freedom of religion is the reason many of us (or our ancestors) left everything familiar to come here. I think we’re more attached to it than the Left realizes.

If I’m right, then the higher number in the straight-up “religious freedom is primary” question is the accurate number while the lower numbers that are attached to culturally-charged anxiety triggers are less accurate. I guess we’ll find out in November when voters are not answering a live pollster … “What will she think of me?!” … but casting secret ballots that will help decide the fate of the nation.

The March poll provides support for my thesis. It asked twice about forcing health insurance plans to provide free birth control, once for just anybody and then again for groups that have moral or religious objections to birth control. Where the question was purely secular, opposition to mandatory free birth control was 51%. But when they mentioned religious or moral objections in the question, opposition increased by 6 points. And notice in the June poll that the HHS mandate issue ALONE has resulted in a 13% to 16% shift toward opposition to Obama!

I think the lesson for us is clear.

When we’re talking with those critical Undecideds who will swing this close race for or against us, we should couch the discussions in terms of CORE values.

“It’s not about birth control. It’s about keeping the government from forcing people to violate their religious beliefs.”

“This is not about race. We elected a black man to our highest office. We’ve proven we aren’t a racist nation anymore. Now we need to ask if he has fixed the economy and gotten people back to work like he said he would.”

One final point … I’m interested in how well our messaging is getting past the alphabet media blockade, so I snooped through the data to see if I could see any signs that there’s been a shift in opinion over the five months these polls tracked. I think there has been and it’s to our side.

Three polls asked variations on the generic question: Should health insurance plans be required to provide free birth control? The February poll showed 43% of Likely Voters opposed, but the March and May polls both showed 51% of Adult Americans opposed. Since Likely Voters generally poll more Center-Right than Adult Americans, the actual shift toward support for religious freedom may have been even higher than 8%. And it’s held up against the Left’s onslaughts.

Thank God for the First Amendment, talk radio, the internet and our church pulpits!

A Survey of recent opinion polls re: The HHS Mandate

February 2012 (Likely Voters)

Should health insurance companies be required by law to provide free …

… Contraception: 43% No.

… Morning after pills: 50% No.

March 2012 (Adult Americans)

Should health insurance plans for all employees have to cover the full cost of birth control for female employees or should employers be able to opt out for moral or religious reasons?

Plans offered by secular institutions: 40% Must cover vs. 51% Opt out vs. 9% Meh.

Plans offered by religious institutions: 36% Must cover vs. 57% Opt out vs. 7% Meh.

CtH: The second “Opt out” is 6% higher and the Meh is 2% lower. Another sign that we have a special place in our hearts for protecting religious freedom.

May 2012 (Adult Americans)

Should freedom of religion be protected, even if it conflicts with other laws?

Adults: 74% Yes vs. 26% No vs. 0% Meh.

Is it morally wrong to force health care workers and doctors to provide abortion when they object for religious reasons?

Adults: 72% Yes vs. 27% No vs. 1% Meh.

Should individual health care providers and organizations providing health insurance policies be allowed to opt out of providing …

Abortion: 58% Yes vs. 38% No vs. 4% Meh

Birth control pills: 51% Yes vs. 46% No vs. 3% Meh

Abortion-inducing drugs: 51% Yes vs. 44% No vs. 5% Meh

Medication to speed the death of a terminally ill patient: 55% Yes vs. 41% No vs. 4% Meh

In vitro fertilization treatments that could result in the death of an embryo: 52% Yes vs. 41% No vs. 7% Meh

Do you believe …

… Contraception is morally acceptable? 88% Yes.

… Abortion is wrong in an of itself? 58% Yes.

June 2012 (Registered Voters)

Is providing free birth control worthy of federal concern?

Catholics: 57% No vs. 37% Yes.

Women: 44% No vs. 51% Yes.

Does the federal government have the right to force morally objectionable coverage on religious institutions?

Women: 57% No.

Should birth control be treated like any other drug, without mandatory coverage?

Catholics: 67% Yes. Women 63% Yes.

Will the HHS mandate make you less likely to vote for Obama, more likely to vote for Obama, or have no impact on your vote?

Religiously active white females: 38% Less Likely vs. 12% More Likely. (38 – 12 = 16 away from Obama)

Catholics: 29% Less Likely vs. 13% More Likely. (29 – 13 = 16 away from Obama)

Independents: 28% Less Likely vs. 15% More Likely. (28 – 15 = 13 away from Obama)

Sources

February poll of Likely Voters by Rasmussen reported @

http://www.lifenews.com/2012/02/22/poll-americans-oppose-obama-birth-control-coverage-mandate/

March poll of Adult Americans by New York Times/CBS News reported @

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2012/03/13/us/politics/president-obamas-approval-rating-drops.html?ref=politics

May poll of Adult Americans by Marist College commissioned by the Knights of Columbus reported @

http://www.lifenews.com/2012/05/22/poll-majority-of-americans-oppose-obama-hhs-mandate/

June poll of Registered Voters by QEV Analytics commissioned by The Catholic Association reported @

http://www.lifenews.com/2012/06/19/new-poll-hhs-mandate-hurts-obama-with-women-catholics/

2 Comments

Filed under Abortion, Barack Obama, Democrats, Economy, Elections, First Amendment, HHS, Law, Media Bias, Obamacare, Polls, Race Relations, Religious Liberty, Unemployment

For the first time in my adult life …

… I am PROUD to be an American Catholic!

Bishops Prepare for Largest Civil Disobedience Since the 60s by Andrew Bair – June 3, 2012

http://www.lifenews.com/2012/06/03/bishops-prepare-for-largest-civil-disobedience-since-the-60s/

The United States Catholic bishops are readying American Catholics for what may be the largest campaign of civil disobedience since the Civil Rights Movement of the 1960’s.

In addition to 12 lawsuits against the Obama Administration including 46 plaintiffs from dioceses, hospitals and universities, the US Catholic bishops will urge Catholics to openly defy the Obama HHS Mandate. In June, the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) will distribute bulletin inserts nationwide, which reference Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. and his call for civil disobedience in response to unjust laws.

The USCCB bulletin insert quotes “Letter from Birmingham Jail” in which Dr. King writes, “I would agree with Saint Augustine that ‘An unjust law is no law at all.’… A just law is a man-made code that squares with the moral law or the law of God. An unjust law is a code that is out of harmony with the moral law.”

The Catholic bishops also note in the document, “Some unjust laws impose such injustices on individuals and organizations that disobeying the laws may be justified. Every effort must be made to repeal them. When fundamental human goods, such as the right of conscience, are at stake, we may need to witness to the truth by resisting the law and incurring its penalties.”

The USCCB has organized a two-week campaign called the Fortnight for Freedom, which will extend from June 21st through July 4th to raise awareness about the threats to rights of conscience posed by the HHS mandate. The very same authority used by the HHS Secretary under the Obama healthcare law to mandate insurance coverage of contraceptives and sterilizations could also be used to force coverage of surgical abortions. The mandate is scheduled to go into effect on August 1st.

Recently, the USCCB released a document entitled “Our First, Most Cherished Liberty” in which the bishops emphasized they would not back down from their opposition the HHS Mandate. http://www.usccb.org/issues-and-action/religious-liberty/our-first-most-cherished-liberty.cfm

EXCERPT:

We are Catholics. We are Americans. We are proud to be both, grateful for the gift of faith which is ours as Christian disciples, and grateful for the gift of liberty which is ours as American citizens. To be Catholic and American should mean not having to choose one over the other. Our allegiances are distinct, but they need not be contradictory, and should instead be complementary. That is the teaching of our Catholic faith, which obliges us to work together with fellow citizens for the common good of all who live in this land. That is the vision of our founding and our Constitution, which guarantees citizens of all religious faiths the right to contribute to our common life together.

Freedom is not only for Americans, but we think of it as something of our special inheritance, fought for at a great price, and a heritage to be guarded now. We are stewards of this gift, not only for ourselves but for all nations and peoples who yearn to be free. Catholics in America have discharged this duty of guarding freedom admirably for many generations.

In 1887, when the archbishop of Baltimore, James Gibbons, was made the second American cardinal, he defended the American heritage of religious liberty during his visit to Rome to receive the red hat. Speaking of the great progress the Catholic Church had made in the United States, he attributed it to the “civil liberty we enjoy in our enlightened republic.” Indeed, he made a bolder claim, namely that “in the genial atmosphere of liberty [the Church] blossoms like a rose.”

From well before Cardinal Gibbons, Catholics in America have been advocates for religious liberty, and the landmark teaching of the Second Vatican Council on religious liberty was influenced by the American experience. It is among the proudest boasts of the Church on these shores. We have been staunch defenders of religious liberty in the past. We have a solemn duty to discharge that duty today.

2 Comments

Filed under Catholic Church, HHS, Life Issues, Obamacare, Religious Liberty

MSM yawns over religious freedom protests

Chrissy’s Site Bites @ http://news.webshots.com/photo/2853928450056011884pvRuHs

Click on graphic to embiggen.

If you like this, you might also enjoy @ https://polination.wordpress.com/2012/05/25/the-journalistic-establishments-latest-violation-of-public-trust/

2 Comments

Filed under Catholic Church, HHS, Media Bias, Obamacare, Religious Liberty

Pro-Aborts in Obama Administration

TAIT SYE
NOW: Deputy Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs at Health and Human Services
FORMERLY: Top Media Director for Planned Parenthood, the nation’s biggest abortion business

DAWN JOHNSEN
NOW: Assistant Attorney General for the Office of the Legal Counsel
FORMERLY: Legal Director for NARAL Pro-Choice America (formerly known as National Abortion Rights Action League)

ELLEN MORAN
NOW: White House Communications Director
FORMERLY: Director of Emily’s List, a political PAC that only supports candidates who favor taxpayer-funded abortions and opposed partial-birth abortion ban

MELODY BARNES
NOW: Director of the Domestic Policy Council
FORMERLY: Emily’s List board member

Also picked by Obama for powerful positions:

LINDSAY SILER
NOW: Head of Obama’s re-election campaign in North Carolina
FORMERLY: Director of Public Policy for Planned Parenthood Health Systems

MORGAN CHRISTEN
NOW: Federal judge appointed by Obama to the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals
FORMERLY: Board member of Planned Parenthood

Source:
Obama Admin Hires Planned Parenthood Spokesman at HHS
by Steven Ertelt | Washington, DC | LifeNews.com | 4/20/12 3:17 PM
http://www.lifenews.com/2012/04/20/obama-admin-hires-planned-parenthood-spokesman-at-hhs/

3 Comments

Filed under Abortion, Barack Obama, HHS, Planned Parenthood

Obama’s $8 Billion Dollar Bait-and-Switch Trick


Click on graphic to embiggen.

Chrissy’s Site Bites @ http://news.webshots.com/photo/2015917380056011884RfDuPg

Here is how it works. HHS is allowed to spend money without specific approval by Congress on experiments aimed at increasing the efficiency and economy of health services. This 1967 statute has been properly used in the past to study the effects of new medical techniques or strategies aimed at lowering Medicare costs. Obama means to misuse it for a blatantly non-experimental and wholly political purpose. The Government Accounting Office recommends HHS cancel the project. If Obama insists on continuing, Congress should immediately launch a very public investigation.

Source: An $8 billion trick? Toying with Medicare to fix elex By Benjamin E. Sasse & Charles Hurt – April 23, 2012

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/opedcolumnists/an_billion_trick_ImTBFfz7MeuZLJY7JzXEIJ

H/t Pistol Pete’s Grudge Report

If you like this, you might also enjoy @ https://polination.wordpress.com/2012/03/26/doesnt-he-mean-less-accountability-to-american-voters/

5 Comments

Filed under Barack Obama, HHS, Medicare/Medicaid

Evil ObamaCare Provides Tax Dollars for Abortion

On Monday, March 12, 2012, the Department of Health and Human Services issued a final rule regarding establishment of the state health care exchanges required under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PL 111-148).

The rule provides for taxpayer funding of insurance plans that include elective abortion.  This departure from the longstanding policy is accomplished through an accounting arrangement described in the Affordable Care Act and reiterated in the final rule.

To comply with the accounting requirement, plans collect a $1 abortion surcharge from each premium payer.  The enrollee will make two payments, $1 per month for abortion and another payment for the rest of the services covered.  As described in the rule, the surcharge can only be disclosed to the enrollee at the time of enrollment.  Furthermore, insurance plans may only advertise the total cost of the premiums without disclosing that enrollees will be charged a $1 per month to directly subsidize abortions.

The final rule mentions, but does not address concerns about abortion coverage in “multi-state” plans administered by the Federal Government’s Office of Personal Management (OPM).  There is nothing in the Affordable Care Act to prevent some OPM (government administered) plans from covering elective abortion, and questions remain about whether OPM multi-state plans will include elective abortion.  If such plans do include abortion, there are concerns that the abortion coverage will even be offered in states that have prohibited abortion coverage in their state exchanges. The final rule indicates that specific standards for multi-state plans will be forthcoming in future rules from OPM.

The final rule extinguishes the hope that the implementation of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act would respect the rights of the unborn and the religious liberty of pro-life citizens who have conscientious objections to their tax dollars being used to fund abortion.

Source:
Email from http://www.lldf.org/

3 Comments

Filed under Abortion, Barack Obama, HHS, Obamacare