A veterinarian who lives on the southern border recounts his personal experiences with drug and human traffickers. His testimony is compelling and heart-breaking.
He asked Pelosi one question, which was, “Will you cooperate with President Trump to build a wall, hire more border patrol, and end sanctuary cities?”
Pelosi’s rambling response adds up to, “Hell, no.” Her reasons are nonsense and, frankly, insulting to the gentleman’s real life problems.
It’s pretty common knowledge that the democrats have always relied on the courts to advance their agenda when they can’t get it done legislatively. That’s why they fight so viciously over SCOTUS nominees. If the balance were ever to tip toward constructionist judges they would be dead in the water. They don’t have the power to stop the president so they have once again returned to the huge stable of liberals judges in their rolodexes that are all too happy to supplant the rule of law with their personal opinions.
Boston federal judge rejects extended stay on Trump travel ban “The order provides a reasonably conceivable state of facts (which concerns national security and) that could provide a rational basis for the classification,” he wrote. “Accordingly, this Court declines to encroach upon the “delicate policy judgment” inherent in immigration decisions.”
THIS JUDGE WOULD NOT EXTEND THE STAY
NO PROBLEM, THERE ARE OTHERS
Seattle jurist’s sweeping order comes hours after Boston court seemed to bless president’ s anti-terror immigration halt. Then, the White House hit back. U.S. District Court Judge James Robart ruled in favor of the attorneys general of Washington state and Minnesota on a lawsuit they brought seeking to overturn the order limiting travel to the U.S. by citizens of seven Muslim-majority countries.
The ruling prompted a typically combative reaction from the Trump White House Friday night, but in a departure from recent patterns, the most confrontational language was quickly dialed back.
Judge Robart is also a support of the radical Black Lives Matter group.
On Trial: Why Trump’s Immigration Ban Will Win Over Seattle Judge’s Nationwide Order As the Boston judge explained, the Supreme Court provided that rational basis review merely means the law “bears some fair relationship to a legitimate public purpose.” The Supreme Court made clear rational basis review “is not a license for courts to judge the wisdom, fairness or logic of legislative choices.” (Heller v. Doe by Doe, 509 U.S. 312 (1993).
Government To File For Emergency Stay To Stop Restraining Order On Travel Ban
Again, this is all just on the restraining order. If the emergency stay is granted, the travel ban will continue until there is a decision on the merits of the case.
FEDERAL COURT ISN’T THE ONLY PLACE BATTLES ARE GOING ON Chelsea Clinton Tells Kellyanne Conway, “Please Don’t Make Up Attacks”, But Gets Reminded Of A Few Facts
Kellyanne Conway misspoke, referring to a “Bowling Green massacre” when talking about terrorists discovered in Kentucky. While terrorists were erroneously let into the country and did settle in Bowling Green, Kentucky, there was no actual massacre here in the United States. Conway meant killing of U.S. soldiers in Iraq.
Chelsea Clinton then decided to attack her with the above tweet.
First, offensive to hook an attack against Kellyanne Conway with a real attack against police at the Louvre.
Second, who was your mother and what did she do? THIS CORRUPT TRASH IS PUNCHING WAY OUT OF HER WEIGHT CLASS AGAINST KELLYANNE THAT’S GONNA LEAVE A MARK
“Every argument [the Left makes] in favor of unfettered immigration applies even more directly to the unborn.Their position on illegal aliens and refugees is, after all, an ethical position. They appeal almost entirely to morality, dismissing with contempt practical concerns like security and sovereignty. They say that these people — illegal aliens, refugees — are human beings and as such they deserve to be treated with respect (which is true). They say that it is our responsibility as citizens to deal with whatever inconvenience or burden caused by their presence. Their right to enter our country supersedes our own concerns (which is definitely not true).
” And yet the same people who make this argument will utterly reject the exact same argument as it pertains to children. They deny that parents have any moral obligation to their unborn children. They deny that children have any right whatsoever to enter the world. They proclaim that the inconvenience caused by a child’s presence supersedes his right to exist.In other words, they say that an American citizen has a GREATER responsibility to an immigrant from Mexico or a refugee from Syria than to her own child.”
Hypocrites Schumer and Pelosi holding up teensy little electric tealights while ranting about “this great light” and the Statue of Liberty while saying THE EXACT OPPOSITE of what they said when Obama was president … BWAHAHAHA!
So said President Clinton and President Obama. You must watch these. They are IMPORTANT (and if you’re a Trump supporter, they are also funny).
Trump Listens to Obama-Clinton on Immigration [2:28]
Gee, if only Obama had done what he SAID and actually enforced immigration laws, instead of telling LEOs to let illegals go free, even if they’d committed violent crimes. He was such a freaking liar! But he’s ON RECORD here, so BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!
The Truth About Trump’s “Muslim Ban”[6:31]
H/t Bluebird of Bitterness
Comments Off on “We are a nation of immigrants, but we are also a nation of laws.”
There is much to put together on the news of the day: Trump nominating Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme court. I have not yet completed the task of putting things in order. However, in an effort to entertain early risers I’m posting some YouTube videos pertinent to current events.
Morning Joe Panel Blasts Democrats for Not Coming to Terms With Being in the Minority
[CtH: I must say again to the older gentleman who declared that nobody under 35 shares Trump’s values … WHEN WILL DEMOCRATS LISTEN?! I have six kids under 35. They like Trump.]
Law Professor: Trump’s Immigration Ban Constitutional, Admin ‘Absolutely’ Had Right to Fire AG
[CtH: Turley – “It’s very inconsistent.” Professor, you make the mistake of thinking Obamacrats care about law, policy, or values. They don’t. They care about personalities, feelings, and destroying America. In that sense, the woman’s actions were totally consistent with what the Justice Dept did during Obama’s tenure. Dearest thinks she’s been promised a pay off for pulling this stunt. I’m inclined to agree. Look for her to run for office with big Democrat money support.https://polination.wordpress.com/2017/01/31/its-not-about-law-policy-or-values/%5D
Hatch Blasts Democrats for Boycotting Votes on Trump Nominees
Sen. Wyden Was Against Partisan Obstructionism Before He Supported It
Sen. Hatch: ‘This is the most pathetic thing I’ve seen in my whole time in the United States Senate’
I REMEMBER WHEN THE DEMOCRATS IN WISCONSIN PULLED THE SAME STUNT SO AS TO AVOID HAVING A VOTE ON NEUTERING THE TEACHERS’ UNION IN WISCONSIN. A BUNCH OF THEM STAYED IN A MOTOR INN DOWN HERE IN TOWN. EVENTUALLY THEY HAD TO RETURN AND THE REPUBLICAN-LED LEGISLATURE TOOK AWAY MANDATORY DUES DEDUCTIONS. GIVEN A CHOICE, MOST OPTED TO KEEP THE MONEY IN THEIR OWN POCKETS RATHER THAN GIVE IT TO THE BOSSES TO BE PASSED ON TO THE DEMOCRAT PARTY.
Dem Senator Compares Trump’s Immigration Order to Japanese Internment Camps
[CtH: Sen. Mazie Hirono (D-Hawaii) lies AGAIN about how the executive order targets Muslims. It DOESN’T. And for crying out loud, if banning immigration from SOME COUNTRIES is comparable to rounding up Japanese-American citizens into internment camps, then where the heck was the outrage when Presidents Carter and Obama DID THE SAME THING? They’ve lost their minds. Or maybe they never had any.]
Hatch Praises Judge Gorsuch’s Nomination to Supreme Court
Pelosi: It’s a very hostile appointment… Lovely family, I’m sure. But as far as your family is concerned, uh, uh, if you breathe air, drink water, eat food, take medicine or in any other way interact with the courts this is a very bad decision.
[Pelosi says Gorsuch is “well outside the mainstream of American legal thought.” By this, she means he doesn’t legislate for Progressive social change from the bench.]
VIOLENT BARBIE JEEP RACING!!
PETE DARES TO BE DIFFERENT.