True, it was a lovely Saturday in May, lots of reason for kids to be cramming for finals or outside enjoying the weather. But this was the President of the United States who was wildly popular with young voters in 2008. And the Obama campaign boasted an expected overflow crowd. They didn’t get one, but this embarrassment was expertly cover up by most of the big media outfits. They’re good at that, having had plenty of experience in covering up for Teh Won over the last four years.
John McCain (April 29, 2012) — “This is the same president who said, after bin Laden was dead, that we shouldn’t ‘spike the ball’ after the touchdown. And now Barack Obama is not only trying to score political points by invoking Osama bin Laden, he is doing a shameless end-zone dance to help himself get re-elected.” http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/apr/29/obamas-re-election-strategists-resurrect-bin-laden/
The White House marked the first anniversary of the SEAL Team Six raid that killed Osama bin Laden by releasing this campaign ad:
Not surprisingly, the Right has been underwhelmed:
But it seems that even some on the Left are disgusted!
Arianna Huffington (April 30, 2012)
“To turn it [killing bin Laden] into a campaign ad is one of the most despicable things you can do.”
One thing is clear. Barack Obama is no hero. He’s also not being honest about what Romney said. During the last presidential campaign, the Left was pitching the meme that the GWOT was a failure because Bush hadn’t captured or killed Osama bin Laden. (Of course, if he had, they would have just changed the name to whoever took over from him.)
ABC report Liz Sidoti asked presidential candidate Mitt Romney: “Would the world be safer if bin laden were caught?”
Romney: “Yes, but by a small percentage increase – a very insignificant increase in safety by virtue of replacing bin Laden with someone else. Zarqawi – we celebrated the killing of Zarqawi, but he was quickly replaced. Global Jihad is not an effort that is being populated by a handful or even a football stadium full of people. It is – it involves millions of people and is going to require a far more comprehensive strategy than a targeted approach for bin laden or a few of his associates.”
Sidoti: “Do you fault the administration for not catching him though? I mean, they’ve had quite a few years going after him.”
Romney: “There are many things that have not been done perfectly in any conduct of war. In the Second World War, we paratroopered in our troops further than they were supposed to be from the beaches. We landed in places on the beaches that weren’t anticipated. Do I fault Eisenhower? No, he won. And I’m nowhere near as consumed with bin Laden as I am concerned about global Jihadist efforts.”
ABC and Obama quote only part of Romney’s actual response, making him sound soft on terror. But Romney clearly was and is nothing of the kind.
Liberal Bob Beckel Loses It: Screams “You Don’t Know What the F*ck You’re Talking About” on Hannity [:24]
So classy how he flatly refuses to apologize for dropping the F bomb on television.
New Tone… Democrat Tamara Holder Says Mitt Romney Is ‘Borderline Brain-Dead’ [1:18]
Democrat strategist Tamara Holder cannot produce ONE THING that has improved under Obama. Rather than honestly answer Hannity’s question or respond to any of the facts he cites, she goes off on a rant about how Mitt Romney is “borderline brain-dead.” TIP: After you listen to the clip, turn the sound off and play it again so you can just watch Malkin’s face … esp at 1:10. ::snort::
Michelle Malkin’s Advice to Mitt Romney: “Quit Calling Obama ‘A Nice Man’ …He’s Not”
Michelle gets to respond to the above. Note how she kept quiet during Tamara’s rant, but Tamara cannot bring herself to give Michelle the same courtesy. AFTER Hannity insists she shut her pie hole, Michelle goes on her own rant and it’s a doozy.
My dogs ride inside their crates in the back seat of the car … but we don’t have 5 kids and all the luggage that a vacationing family of 7 would need.
IOW, the Romneys’ choices were to kennel the dog for the entire vacation or securely strap his travel crate to the roof. My guess is that Seamus preferred the roof to a lonely trip to some kennel.
This is such a nothing issue. Sad to say, it seems to have been started by Gingrich supporters! Argh. They make it sound like he strapped the DOG to the roof. Sheesh. They strapped the CRATE to the roof. Those crates are rated for air travel.
Besides … I’ve seen plenty of dogs traveling in cars with their heads hanging out a window or, worse, loose in the backs of pickup trucks. I used to let my dog hang out the window until the day she got over-excited by a squirrel and fell out! That was a long time before doggy seat belts and such. I started attaching her leash to the seat belt, but I still let her hang out until the vet told me how bad it was for her eyes and ears.
As for crates themselves being cruel … bushwa. I had a brain damaged dog once who would have a nervous breakdown whenever he got left alone. And by “alone” I mean, with another dog and several cats! He destroyed the couch, an expensive art book and the bathroom flooring before I discovered airline crates.
Crate training is now a well-recognized benefit for dogs, but back then, it was “You put him in a box! That’s cruel!” (My father’s comment.) Yeah, well … when Merlin was in his crate, he was fine about me leaving for school. It was his place. He LOVED his crate. I could open the door and say, “Box”, and he’d RUN in! He felt safe and secure in there.
One morning, I was sick in bed. When my roomie left and locked the door, Merlin started pacing and whining like he was about to have a panic attack. I called out, “I’m still here,” and he came running in and the look on his face clearly said, “Oh, Thank GOD! I thought you’d gone off and left me alone outside my box!!” If he’d had a forearm and a sweaty brow, he’d have used them.
Years later, we adopted a retired racing greyhound. Before we could take her home, we were required to buy an airline crate, because racing greyhounds spend most of their days and nights inside similar containers. Having a crate of her own helped her make the transition from kennel life to living in a house with humans.
I can’t comment on the Massachusetts dog law. If they’ve made it illegal, I suppose then you can’t do it. But seeing as nobody pulled them over on their way to Canada, I question that it was illegal in 1983. I’d also point out that we’re talking about the only State that voted for McGovern. Dumb, intrustive laws are their specialty. http://www.dumblaws.com/laws/united-states/massachusetts
So … in the interest of fair and balanced mockery … here is the Right Wingnut Neener Neener on the Horrible Abuse of Dogs by Presidential Candidates forum:
Obama has actually EATEN A DOG! OMG, how can dog lovers vote for him!?!?!
Asking a comedian to make fun of Obama is like asking a priest to mock Christ by Greg Gutfeld
So comedians and their adoring media are in a crisis: How do you make fun of Mitt Romney when you’re dumb? Well, you can keep doing the rich thing like commentator Paul Begala. FYI: “I hear he is playing Paul Bunyan’s big toe in an upcoming bio.” It’s true. When comparing Mitt to Obama, Paul said “Romney could buy and sell him 100 times.” Glad I didn’t say that.
Anyway, now hacks are comparing Mitt to Mad Men’s Don Draper. Yeah, that’s smart. Compare a Mormon family man to a hard-drinking, hard-smoking ladies’ man. What is the connection here? Well, they’re both good looking and successful. Clever.
And how sad is it that comics just can’t get a handle on Obama even when those ears look so tempting? In the Times yesterday, Maureen Dowd chatted with Saturday Night Live over how tough political comedy is. Says Seth Meyers, “Comedy writers are incredibly promiscuous and we want as many targets as possible.” He left out the word “Republican” before targets because I don’t see much else on that show.
Look, asking a comedian to make fun of Obama is like asking a priest to mock Christ. If you look at government as religion there is only one almighty savior, and you don’t commit sacrilege – and also, you want to keep your job.
Which is why comics can only make fun of stay-at-home moms, holy men, and aborsh. Yeah, aborsh – the cute phrase Sarah Silverman coined while illustrating her fake before and after abortion pictures on Twitter. So, instead of speaking truth to power, instead mock the powerless. That’s as edgy as Paul Begala’s head.
(And Purple Cow continues his? her? inane and hyper-left-wing commenting.)
A Matter of Principle – Our GOP Nominee vs. Obama
By angelaisms – April 11, 2012
Over the course of the last week, I kept running into people (so to speak) in comments, on Twitter, and calling into radio shows, who all stated uncategorically that there was no way this side of a bunny-ridden hell that they would ever ever ever vote for Willard “Mittens” Romney, even if he’s the guy with the “R” next to his name on the 2012 Presidential ballot. And each time, I darn near hit the ceiling – quite a feat for someone as vertically challenged as I am.
“It’s a matter of principle! We’ll teach that GOP a lesson!” they exclaim, firmly planting a Gadsden flag at their feet and giving the world the sort of stare that dares you to go ahead and “make their day.”
What they seem to miss is that they’ve planted that flagpole, not at their feet, but through their feet.
[Caveat: I recognize there is a small class of lazy women who give birth, then dump the kids on grannies, nannies and others, so they can either live it up on their trust funds, sugar daddy allowance or welfare checks. For simplicity’s sake, let’s just agree to call these women Not Moms, k?]
In 2007,55% of new moms returned to the workforce, while 45% stayed home.
IOW, we’re about evenly divided. And we ALL work!
A search for internet lingo located SAHM (Stay At Home Mom) and WAHM (Work At Home Mom, which I assume means someone with a job that can be done from home or a home-based business). I was not able to find an acronym for moms who have part- or full-time jobs that take them outside their homes; unless someone knows something better, I’m going to invent WOHM (Work Outside Home Mom).
For reasons that escape me, some SAHMs criticize their opposites for “choosing career over their children”, while some WOHMs criticize their opposites for “giving up their ambitions and income for an apron and a vacuum.”
Both of these criticisms are ridiculous. While the feminist movement has given women many more choices than my female ancestors had, life doesn’t always let us take advantage of them. Plenty of WOHMs would prefer to stay home with their babies and vice versa. Besides which … wasn’t the whole point of feminism to let women CHOOSE? Why then are we condemning each other for MAKING CHOICES?!
Frankly, I’ve never understood the kind of women who make sweeping judgments about entire classes of other women. I’ve been the brunt of this kind of prejudice a few times … always by someone who had no idea of my family’s situation. It seems to me such prejudiced women are very far from the alleged ideal of feminism. What’s right for one is not necessarily right for another. If all of society is supposed to support my choices, why do these women feel so justified and self-righteous about condemning them?
When we criticize other women for their choices, we criticize ourselves as women. Not that this stopped bitchy DNC advisor Hilary Rosen from pompously declaring that Mitt’s wife, Ann, “has never worked a day in her life.”
Sorry, you pathetic excuse for a modern woman, but your sneering, politically-driven opinions have NO BASIS in the facts of Ann Romney’s life. The following comes from the Wikipedia bios of Mitt and Ann Romney. It’s all public record and easily accessible. And just for full disclosure … I voted for Newt.
The Romneys married in March of 1969 after Mitt returned from his Mormon mission tour. Their first son was born in 1970 while both were undergraduates at Brigham Young, living in a $75-a-month basement apartment.
In 1971, Mitt was graduated (Summa cum laude) from BYU with a BA in English and Ann gave birth to their second son. The young family then moved to Boston so that he could attend a new four-year program coordinated between Harvard Law and Harvard Business Schools.
In 1975, Mitt was graduated with a joint Juris Doctor/Master of Business Administration. He was in the top third of his law school class and the top 5% of his business school class. Also in 1975, Ann gave birth to their third son AND received a Bachelor of Liberal Arts degree with a concentration in French language from Harvard Extension School.
While Mitt was working at his first job, Ann gave birth to their fourth (1978) and fifth (1981) sons. Then, in 1984, with five children, ages 3 through 13, Mitt and Ann decided to jump feet first into following Mitt’s dream of running his own company, a private equity investment firm he and his partner, Bill Bain, called Bain Capital.
In the face of skepticism from potential investors, Bain and Romney spent a year raising the $37 million in funds needed to start the new operation, which would focus on venture capital opportunities. Their first big success came with a 1986 investment to help start Staples Inc. when Mitt and Ann’s youngest of five was just 5 years old.
Bain Capital eventually made the Romneys wealthy, but that didn’t mean that Ann’s life as a wife, mother and penny-pinching homemaker would suddenly be filled with maids and bon-bons. In 1998, when her youngest was 17, Ann could have been looking forward to moving on to a child-free career of her choice.
Instead, she was diagnosed with multiple sclerosis. She designed a mixture of mainstream and alternative treatments and credits them with helping her continue to live fully. MS is incurable, yet since contracting the disease, she has helped Mitt run for governor and, from 2003 to 2007, served as First Lady of Massachusetts, where she worked on faith-based initiatives and children’s charities.
During Mitt’s 2008 presidential bid, she was an active participant and perhaps the most visible of all the Republican candidates’ wives. She was also diagnosed with breast cancer and underwent a lumpectomy. She has been cancer-free for four years and credits her husband’s unwavering care and devotion for helping her through it all.
Their sons have gifted them with sixteen grandchildren and, when she is not doting on them, she is working hard with Mitt on his 2012 presidential campaign.
So Mitt Romney recently had a rally in Illinois, during which the following “point” was made by a young woman in the crowd:
“You‘re all for like ’yay freedom and all this stuff and yay pursuit of happiness.’ You know what would make me happy? Free birth control!”
Clearly, a woman of this intellectual caliber possesses a far greater understanding of the world than myself. She sounds absolutely nothing like a drunken frat boy who would follow up this statement by throwing his arms in the air, shouting “WOOOOOOOOO!!!!” and high-fiving all his friends while farting into the microphone. Despite my obvious disadvantage, and the fact that I’m sick of the whole birth control non-issue anyway, here is my response to Liberal Illinois Chick:
Yeah, that’s cute. You know what makes me happy? Video games. I loooooove my video games, RPGs especially. (“ZOMG, she just threatened us with grenades!” Relax-, it stands for “role-playing games” — the kind that don’t need latex and safe words.) I’ve played through and beaten most of the Final Fantasy and Dragon Warrior/Quest games, and am literally still angry and all shake-fisty that my PS3 isn’t backwards compatible. (Damn you, Sony!) I have multiple max-level characters in World of Warcraft, Everquest II, and Star Wars: The Old Republic. I know for a fact that the time I’ve spent on those games alone adds up to more than a full year of playtime — and that’s not counting the I-don’t-even-want-to-know-how-many hours I’ve logged in front of Tetris, Dr. Mario, Gran Turismo, Dynasty Warriors, SSX, Legend of Zelda, Super Mario Bros., Angry Birds, Minesweeper…
You get the idea.
“But wait,” you say. “Video games are entertainment! Birth control is for health!” Well, that point is disputable. It is true that there are many medical reasons for women to be on hormone therapy. But the vast majority of American women who are using the pill, or one of its cousins, are doing so for one simple reason: to have sex without worrying about being “punished with a baby.” (Thanks, Mr. President!) Given this fact, it is easy to make the case that hormonal contraception could be considered little more than a recreational drug. Sure, there are lots of benefits to a healthy sex life. There are a lot of benefits to playing video games as well. But the bottom line is that, just like I don’t have to pick up that controller, you don’t have to drop your pants. And neither of us should be forced to pay for the other’s entertainment.
That’s the surface argument, and it is a good one. But let’s delve a little deeper here into what you’re actually saying. It’s exactly the same as a point that Senator Rand Paul made awhile back — and while he was skewered in the press for saying it, it’s 100% true: Whenever you start demanding “free stuff,” what you are doing is advocating slavery. …