Click on graphics to embiggen.

Chrissy’s Site Bites: http://news.webshots.com/photo/2874150980056011884oGUPzZ

Chrissy’s Site Bites: http://news.webshots.com/photo/2376485120056011884HXqsjT
Click on graphics to embiggen
The Leftist rant that Republicans and Conservatives are right-wing extremists is a lie. We are the middle. They are the extremists.
Filed under Democrats, Republicans
Bob, this one’s for your brother. Thanks for the topic. It was fun!
Click on graphics to embiggen.
When I was researching this, I saw one survey that depicted the rich as predominantly Republican. Except they defined rich as being any family with a net worth over $150,000, which is totally bogus.
$150,000 may sound like a fortune to a college student, but it isn’t all that much in the real world. Net worth means the value of all of a family’s assets minus their liabilities. A responsible, lives-within-their-means, two-income, middle class couple does not have to have been working all that many years before they’ve built up $150,000 or more in equity in their home, savings and pension funds.
Surveys that looked at political affiliation for those whose net worths are over a million, over 10 million and over 30 million give a much more realistic picture of which economic strata lean toward which political party. And it does not support the Democrat myth of greedy rich Republicans by any means.

Chrissy’s Site Bites: http://news.webshots.com/photo/2268190220056011884tJEsQg

Chrissy’s Site Bites: http://news.webshots.com/photo/2337499140056011884qwULjA

Chrissy’s Site Bites: http://news.webshots.com/photo/2673029040056011884wSBjis

Chrissy’s Site Bites: http://news.webshots.com/photo/2523305310056011884TVMqZj
Filed under Democrats, Republicans
The slippery slope is real and the Left is at the bottom. Bipartisanship and compromise be damned. There are only two sides to this issue and, as with slavery, Republicans are on the right side.
When should the “moral value” of any human life begin? How about at conception, when we have the first living cell containing a full complement of human DNA? Possibly at implantation, when we have a living human organism capable of taking in nourishment and growing.
Anything later than conception or implantation and you have your butt on that slippery slope at the bottom of which is the justified killing of live, healthy human babies for any reason whatsoever.

Chrissy’s Site Bites: http://news.webshots.com/photo/2085431090056011884qfWbJu
Click on graphic to embiggen.
Filed under Abortion, Democrats, Republicans
Here is a little test that will help you decide.
You’re walking down a deserted street with your wife and children. Suddenly, a man with a huge knife comes around the corner, locks eyes with you, screams obscenities, raises the knife, and charges at you. You are carrying a Kimber 1911 cal. 45 ACP, and you are an expert shot. You have mere seconds before he reaches you and your family. What do you do?
THINK CAREFULLY BEFORE READING FURTHER.
If you answered, “Well, that’s not enough information to answer the question … do I have a phone to call 911? What is a Kimber 1911 cal. 45 ACP? Does the man look poor or oppressed? Have I ever done anything to him that would inspire him to attack? Could we run away? What does my wife think? What does the law say about this situation? Is this gun registered? Why am I an expert shot? I hate guns. What kind of message does carrying a loaded gun send to my children? Is it possible this man would be happy with just killing me? Maybe he would be content to just wound me. If I were to grab his knees and hold on, could my family get away while he was stabbing me? Why is this street so deserted? Can we make this a happier, healthier street that would discourage such behavior? We need to raise taxes, have a paint & weed day. I can’t answer this question right now. I need to talk it over with my friends and try to come to a consensus…”, then you are a Democrat.
If you answered, “BANG!”, then you are a Republican.
If you answered, “BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! click reload BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG!”, then you are a Southerner. And if your family said things like, “Nice grouping” or “Can I shoot the next one?”, then they are Southerners too and you should all go out and get yourself some fried food with lots of bar-b-que sauce on it to celebrate.
Filed under Democrats, Republicans
The next time anyone claims that Democrats have been supporting civil rights in America since the dawn of time, send them here:
Chrissy’s Site Bites: http://community.webshots.com/album/582444369XbbevP
Granted, most of the examples are from before most of us were born. But the Democrat website claims they have “worked to pass” and “led the fight” on “every one of our nation’s Civil Rights laws” which is just pure donkey manure.
Those who actually admit to the truth of the Democratic Party’s history still manage to claim that TODAY’S Democrats are the Good People, because all those Bad Old Racist Southern Democrats went and defected to the Republican Party where they acted like a rotten apple in the pro-civil rights barrel of the GOP so that now ALL Republicans are EVIL RAAAAACISTS!
Yeah, right.
The Republican Party was founded in 1854 with the express purpose of ending slavery in the United States. When the first Republican president, Abraham Lincoln, was elected, Southern Democrats seceded from the union rather than accept him as their national leader.
The voting records make it clear that from that time straight through the civil rights acts of 1964-65, it was Republicans who were fighting for civil rights advancements and Democrats who were fighting them.
What has been the big exception since then?
Abortion.
But it is only Democrats who consider the legal killing of unborn Americans to be a civil right.
Republicans consider it worse than slavery or capital punishment. Slaves were fed and housed. Capital criminals get free legal counsel and years of mandatory appeals. The inconvenient unborn aren’t even granted an advocate to speak for them, never mind a hearing or a waiting period before they can be summarily executed.
And they didn’t lose their unalienable Right to Life because a majority of Americans decided they should. They were deemed “nonpersons” (i.e., “property”) under the law by a 5-4 decision of the Supreme Court.
And this society-changing legal decision wasn’t based on any clearly stated unalienable right that had been written into the Constitution by our founding fathers.
It was based on a shadowy right that only some of the most liberal of the justices claimed to have discerned in the “penumbra” of rights listed therein.
(The penumbra is the lighter part of a shadow. The darker part is called the umbra.)
More than 50 million unborn Americans have been slaughtered because a handful of black robed justices and a majority of Democrats decided that this unstated and shadowy “right to privacy” was more important than the clearly stated and spotlighted-in-the-first-line “right to life.”
When it comes to civil rights, 50 million dead babies is about all the modern Democratic Party can really call its own … and they call us the evil ones.
Filed under Abortion, Civil Rights, Constitution, Democrats, Liberty, Republicans, Supreme Court
Click on graphics to embiggen.
The Civil Rights Act of 1871 is still one of the most powerful authorities with which state and federal courts may protect those whose rights are deprived.
Ku Klux Klan means “Circle of Brothers” [kuklos = Greek for circle].
1869–1871 41st Congress 3 Blacks, all Republicans, 1 Senator
1871–1873 42nd Congress 5 Blacks, all Republicans
1873–1875 43rd Congress 7 Blacks, all Republicans
1875–1877 44th Congress 7 Blacks, all Republicans, 1 Senator
1877–1879 45th Congress 4 Blacks, all Republicans, 1 Senator
Enforcement of the Civil Rights Act of 1871 suppressed Klan activity. In 1874 and later, newly organized and openly active paramilitary organizations, such as the White League and the Red Shirts, started a fresh round of violence aimed at suppressing blacks’ voting and running Republicans out of office.
The violence and laws designed to prevent Blacks from voting allowed segregationist white Democrats to regain political power in all Southern states by 1877.
The number of Blacks elected to Congress began to decline until, from 1902 to 1929, there were none.
————-
Sources:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/42nd_United_States_Congress
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_Rights_Act_of_1871
http://millercenter.org/president/events/04_20
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ku_Klux_Klan
http://baic.house.gov/historical-data/representatives-senators-by-congress.html
Filed under Civil Rights, Democrats, KKK, Race Relations, Republicans, U.S. Congress
FACT: Democrat policies promote high energy costs.
FACT: High energy costs harm the poorest first and most.
CONCLUSIONS: Democrats do not care about the poor.
Click on graphic to embiggen.
Comments Off on Lowest gas prices – Republicans 6, Democrats 0
Filed under Democrats, Republicans
Click on graphics to embiggen.
Democrats created the HHS mandate requiring ALL health insurance plans to provide birth control, sterilization and the morning-after abortion pill, thus forcing Americans who oppose these activities to choose between paying for them, which would violate their consciences, or else stop offering health insurance to their employees.

Chrissy’s Site Bites: http://news.webshots.com/photo/2425882000056011884ZKkTXM
Democrats and their lapdogs in the media lied about what the HHS mandate and the Blunt Amendment were about. Rather than admit the HHS mandate was a gross abrogation of our First Amendment rights, they claimed Catholics and Republicans were trying to deprive women of access to birth control, sterilization and the morning-after abortion pill.

Chrissy’s Site Bites: http://news.webshots.com/photo/2536756760056011884jzgFOz
SOURCES:
http://www.lifenews.com/2012/03/01/senate-defeats-blunt-amendment-to-stop-obama-hhs-mandate/
http://www.usccb.org/issues-and-action/religious-liberty/conscience-protection/index.cfm
Filed under Abortion, Catholic Church, Democrats, First Amendment, HHS, Obamacare, Religious Liberty, Republicans, U.S. Senate