Electoral College Bullcrap
Electoral College Bullcrap
Comments Off on Steven Crowder answers objections to the Electoral College
Filed under Elections, Electoral College, Steven Crowder
From our friend Mindful Webworker.
Filed under Elections, Funny Stuff
Presidential vote by religious affiliation and race

In case you were interested

Filed under Donald Trump, Elections, Electoral College, Hillary Clinton
It is a fact that when democrats lose, especially in a monumental upset, they vent their anger in most curious ways. Petulant, egotistical, and bitter, they strike out in all directions in an attempt to get what they want, regardless of morals, ethics, or dignity. Now comes huckster Jill Stein. Fourth place finisher behind Trump, Clinton, and Gary Johnson, looking to cash in on the hysteria. She has raised some $7 million to ‘fund’ this Kabuki theater. Most of it will probably end up in her bank account. As long as it’s not taxpayer money, in the words of my grandson, “I’m good with that.”

Stringent PA Laws That Protect Democrat Voter Fraud May Stop Hillary from Stealing US Election
WHEN I WAS A VERY YOUNG BOY, MY GRANDFATHER TOLD ME IF YOU HOLD A SNAKE BY THE TAIL IT WILL TURN AROUND AND BITE YOU.
The problem with Pennsylvania’s recount process though for Stein and Clinton is that according to state law three voters in each precinct or election district in Pennsylvania must submit a notarized affidavit to the clerk in their individual election districts in order to initiate a recount. There are 9,163 precincts in Pennsylvania. As of noon Monday,the Philadelphia city Board of Elections had received petitions for 35 of the 1,686 voting divisions in Philadelphia, according to City Commissioner Al Schmidt. By 5:30 p.m., that number was 74— about 4 percent of the city’s total divisions
The laws in Pennsylvania are so stringent that it makes it nearly impossible to have a recount in the state. Unfortunately for Republicans there have been numerous mentions of fraud over the years in the city of Philadelphia alone. For example in 2012, in 59 voting divisions in the city, Mitt Romney received not one vote.
The Pennsylvania laws prevent a recount in areas like Philadelphia where there is good reason to suspect Democrat fraud. This year these same stringent laws may prevent Hillary from stealing the US election.
Oops! Jill Stein Misses Pennsylvania Recount Deadline – But She Did Raise a Ton of Cash
Green Party candidate raised enough money for a recount of votes in Pennsylvania but she missed the deadline on Monday to file.
It was a nearly impossible task to begin with.
Despite her successful fundraising effort, state law made Jill Stein’s potential Pennsylvania recount next to impossible.
Stein missed the deadline.
Trump won Pennsylvania by over 70,000 votes.
This was all a scam.
Wisconsin Rejects Doing Recount By Hand, Stein To Sue
The Wisconsin Elections Commission set a timetable Monday for a recount of the presidential election but rejected a request to conduct it by hand made by Green Party candidate Jill Stein, who quickly responded that she would sue.
It will be a race to finish the recount in time to meet a daunting federal deadline, and the lawsuit could delay the process. Under state law, the recount must begin this week as long as Stein or another candidate pays the $3.5 million estimated cost of the recount by Tuesday, election officials said.
Wisconsin Insider on Recount: Expect MASSIVE DNC Voter Fraud to be Exposed
The Wisconsin Elections Commission set a timetable Monday for a recount of the presidential election but rejected a request for a hand recount. The commission is made up of three Democrats and three Republicans. It adopted the recount plans unanimously.
Meanwhile a Wisconsin insider on 4Chan said to expect the recount to expose massive DNC fraud.
The Anonymous “insider” says the recount will reveal people out of state voting, non citizens voting, people voting numerous times, and nursing home violations.
Be ready for Trump to improve his margin of victory
Jill Stein’s recount is a scam — and it also trolls Trump
Jill Stein’s cynical push for recounts in Wisconsin, Pennsylvania and Michigan has two obvious goals: to raise more political cash, and to “troll” President-elect Donald Trump. She’s succeeding on both fronts — the interests of the nation be damned.
It’s a pander to liberal hysteria over Trump’s win that will doubtless feed conspiracy theories for years to come. (At least she left Florida out of it this time.)
Krauthammer: Stein Is the ‘Ralph Nader of 2016 Now Cashing in on Her Sabotage of Clinton Campaign’
For this reason, Krauthammer made comparisons to the 2000 election, when Ralph Nader drew enough votes away from Al Gore in Florida to tip the state in George W. Bush’s favor.
“This is the Ralph Nader of 2016 now cashing in on her sabotage, there’s no other word, of the Clinton campaign,” he said.
Filed under Charles Krauthammer, Democrats, Donald Trump, Elections, Hillary Clinton, Jill Stein, Republicans
According to the article linked below, the answer seems to be Yes for Pennsylvania and Michigan.
Wisconsin apparently has more permissive rules, so a recount may be possible there. But to switch the winner, Trump would have to lose 36 electoral votes to Clinton. Wisconsin only has 10 electoral votes.

Source:
teaparty.org/oops-jill-stein-cannot-file-direct-request-recount-pennsylvania-must-take-court-202882/
Comments Off on Is recount a pipe dream?
Filed under Elections, Electoral College, Jill Stein, Vote Fraud

Matt Walsh posted this on Facebook. He makes some good points.
I’m not going to spend the next four years justifying everything the president says and does just because he’s a Republican. I know this will put me in a minority among conservatives, but I intend to hold Trump accountable same as I would any other politician.
On that note, let’s look at this tweet the President Elect sent out today. Two problems:
First, it’s an abject lie. There is no evidence that “millions” of votes were made illegally. The future president is making wild, conspiratorial claims without the slightest concern about whether those claims have any relation to the truth whatsoever. I imagine him employing this same tactic as president when it comes to matters of national security, where lives are at stake, and it gives me a very queasy feeling.
Second, the Clinton camp is trying to get a recount in several states. The man who WON has now JUSTIFIED those recounts by claiming that millions of votes were illegitimate. By his own words, a national recount of every vote must be conducted. That’s according to Trump himself. The guy who won. The guy who won just questioned the legitimacy of his own win.
And why? Because of his pride. Even though he won, he can’t stomach the idea that fewer people voted for him than Clinton. So, just to service his damned vanity, he undermined his own win and called into question the authenticity of a voting process that just resulted in him becoming president.
We are in for four years of this crap, folks. And I’m not going to play along. I refuse. Trump is wrong here. He’s lying. He’s being a prideful, reckless idiot and he deserves to be raked over the coals for it. And those who defend him on this deserve to be criticized right along with him.
I opposed The Donald for a long time primarily because he struck me as an Obama in White Face. Unqualified. Narcissistic. I think he’s made a lot of progress growing into the job and I pray that as he gets more of his team assembled, they (and his lovely, level-headed wife) will teach him to rein in the campaign rhetoric. It’s not appropriate coming from a president.
But really … wouldn’t it be sweet if a Democrat-demanded recount uncovered evidence of Democrat voter fraud? ::snork::
Filed under Donald Trump, Elections, Electoral College, Matt Walsh, Vote Fraud

“[Clinton campaign lawyer Marc E.] Elias admits the campaign could find no evidence to support a challenge to Trump’s victory, but that is not stopping them from joining Stein in trying to overthrow Trump’s presidency before it begins.”
H/t Pistol Pete
Comments Off on “No evidence to support a challenge”
Filed under Elections, Hillary Clinton
It never changes. Arrogant, overbearing, and dictatorial when they win, graceless, lawless, bitter, and desperate when they lose. When the election of 1960 was over the margin of victory was razor-thin. It hinged on a massive fraudulent vote from Crook County in Illinois. Rather than throw a tantrum and demand a recount, as was his right, Richard Nixon decided to concede with dignity so as not to put the country through such trauma. Fast forward to 2000. Shoe on the other foot, it took the Supreme Court to stop the blatant attempt to steal the presidency after Bush won three — count ’em, three — recounts in Florida.
The leftists were caught completely off guard by Trump’s win they had to quickly devise a plan to steal what they’d lost fair and square. First, have George Soros fund protests all over the country for more than a week. The media ramps up the hysteria by attacking the new administration on every front. Have operatives try to threaten, bribe, or cajole electors into ignoring their mandate to help them steal a win. Then promise a nondescript fringe candidate tens of millions of dollars to be the decoy in an attempt to force recounts in three states that could turn the election. Only a fool believes that Jill Stein has her own interests at heart in this fiasco. She raised $3.1 million during her entire campaign. To fund the recount she came up with more than $5 million in 2 days. They will not go quietly. Hell,they won’t go at all.
Revealed: Hillary Clinton Schemed Since Day After Election to Steal Presidency From Donald Trump
In public Clinton acted out the part of the gracious, retiring loser– being seen in photos running into supporters as she roamed around her hometown of Chappaqua, New York. But the ‘accepting Hillary’ image was a front that hid the true Hillary who was furiously seeking a way to claw back Trump’s election for herself.
Elias admits the campaign could find no evidence to support a challenge to Trump’s victory, but that is not stopping them from joining Stein in trying to overthrow Trump’s presidency before it begins.
“Because we had not uncovered any actionable evidence of hacking or outside attempts to alter the voting technology, we had not planned to exercise this option ourselves, but now that a recount has been initiated in Wisconsin, we intend to participate in order to ensure the process proceeds in a manner that is fair to all sides.”
‘What a Pack of Losers’: Kellyanne Conway Blasts Clinton Campaign For Joining Recount
“What a pack of sore losers,” Conway said in a statement to Bloomberg. “After asking Mr. Trump and his team a million times on the trail, ‘Will HE accept the election results?’ it turns out Team Hillary and their new BFF Jill Stein can’t accept reality.
“Rather than adhere to the tradition of graciously conceding and wishing the winner well, they’ve opted to waste millions of dollars and dismiss the democratic process. The people have spoken. Time to listen up. #YesYourPresident,” Conway said.
Trump Releases Statement: The “Ridiculous” Green Party Recount Effort Is a Scam
This recount is just a way for Jill Stein, who received less than one percent of the vote overall and wasn’t even on the ballot in many states, to fill her coffers with money, most of which she will never even spend on this ridiculous recount. All three states were won by large numbers of voters, especially Pennsylvania, which was won by more than 70,000 votes.
The Democrats’ real strategy in launching recounts
The recounts, if done by hand, which can be demanded, may take longer than the last day for completing the official counts in a state and directing Electoral College voters. If all 3 states miss the deadline, Trump is at 260, Hillary at 232. No one hits 270.
Pennsylvania Recount 2016: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know
Wisconsin Recount Filed 2016: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know
Michigan Recount 2016: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know

Michigan preparing for potential hand recount of 4.8M presidential votes
“This initiative is not about helping one candidate and hurting another,” she said. “We said over and over, we don’t support either of them. In this recount effort, we’re not attempting to overthrow Donald Trump, and I don’t expect that will be the outcome.”
Instead, she said she picked the three states where the vote was the closest to ensure the integrity of the election.
AND TO PICK UP $100M FROM YOUR NEW BFF, GEORGIE BOY
Clinton campaign will participate in Wisconsin recount, with an eye on ‘outside interference,’ lawyer says
In a Medium post, Clinton campaign lawyer Marc Elias said that the campaign had received “hundreds of messages, emails, and calls urging us to do something, anything, to investigate claims that the election results were hacked and altered in a way to disadvantage Secretary Clinton,” especially in Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania, where the “combined margin of victory for Donald Trump was merely 107,000 votes.”
“I don’t think there’s any realistic chance whatsoever that even if recounts are done in Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, that’s going to change the outcome in the states, or in the presidential election generally,” Hasen said.
In a statement Saturday, Trump said the recount was “just a way for Jill Stein, who received less than one percent of the vote overall and wasn’t even on the ballot in many states, to fill her coffers with money.”
Hillary A Month Ago: You Have To Accept The Election Results Or You’re Threatening Democracy
IF YOU HAVEN’T FIGURED OUT BY NOW THAT DEMOCRATS DON’T PLAY BY THE SAME RULES REPUBLICANS ARE EXPECTED TO, YOU’RE NOT PAYING ATTENTION.

Filed under Democrats, Donald Trump, Elections, Electoral College, Hillary Clinton, Jill Stein, Kellyanne Conway