Category Archives: Elections

Drawing a line in the sand

As head of the Archdiocese of New York and president of the Conference of Catholic Bishops, Cardinal Dolan is the biggest honcho in the American branch of the Roman Catholic Church. A while ago, he agreed to deliver the prime-time benediction at the Republican convention in Tampa next week. Since he didn’t want to appear partisan, he told the Dems he would be happy and grateful to deliver a prayer at their convention in Charlotte.

They haven’t called. I doubt Dolan is holding his breath! LOL

The Democrats have announced that a “high ranking” Catholic (to be named later) is going to offer a benediction in Charlotte, but it’s not likely to be the guy heading up the Catholic fight against the Obama Administration’s war on religious freedom. Likely, the “prayer” (such as it is) will be led by one of the bishops who still support the left-wing.

Democrats are really drawing a line in the sand these days!

Catholics have been voting Democrats ever since Irish and Italian Catholics made up the bulk of the unwashed, uneducated, immigrant groups the early 20th c. establishment GOP couldn’t like.

Chrissy’s Site Bites @ http://news.webshots.com/photo/2433107050056011884AtAXEu

After we got our first and so-far only Catholic president, the Democrat Martyred Saint of Camelot, John F. Kennedy, the American Catholic commitment to voting D got even stronger.

However, since Roe v. Wade, the Democratic Party has increasingly chucked Pro-Lifers under the bus. You’d think this might be a problem for Catholics and it has been for about half of us. But old prejudices die hard.

When I turned 18, I never once considered registering Republican. I worked on Carter’s campaign during my first presidential season as a voter; until McCain, it was the only campaign I volunteered for.

But my revulsion for murdering helpless infants proved to be a lot stronger than my Catholic Democrat indoctrination. (It probably helped that I was only 9 when JFK was assassinated.) Anyway, I crossed over to the Right to Life Party and stayed there for decades, voting that line if I could, or going with the most Pro-Life candidate running.

When the Right to Life Party folded, they sent me a letter encouraging me to register Republican. When I read that, I experienced a visceral and incredibly negative gut reaction. It was like they’d told me to eat dog poop or something. It both shocked and shamed me to discover that I had any anti-Republican prejudice in me, much less one of such potency!

So, I held my nose, changed my registration to R and since then have been working on my attitude by learning more about the history of the two major parties. What a shocker to discover it was Democrats who founded the KKK and Republicans who pushed civil rights legislation!

Until very recently, the Catholic “social justice” crowd has held sway with about half of the American Catholic voters. In my experience, these are mostly the folks who think Jesus was a Liberal and therefore whatever Democrats do is What Jesus Would Do. It’s especially prevalent among those who live and work in areas where being Pro-Life equates with being a Right-Wing Religious Nut. (Like where I was born and still live.)

We knew, back in 2008, that Barack Obama was so overtly Pro-Abortion that he deep-sixed Illinois legislation that would have provided medical and comfort care to abortion survivors. IMHO, it takes a really cold, heartless bastard to insist helpless, naked babies be left alone to die. We KNEW this about him and we TOLD our fellow Catholics about it.

When Dearest challenged our pastor on this issue, she handed him a 3-page article that basically boiled down to “It’s okay to ignore the unborn in the name of voting Democrat, because Democrats are the good people who support social justice or something.” Seriously. Dearest and I both read it carefully. There was not a word of Scripture or Catholic teaching in it anywhere, just lots of Democrat Talking Points and muddy logic.

It was crap, but it worked. Check out the Catholic vote for the past 3 presidential elections:

Chrissy’s Site Bites @ http://news.webshots.com/photo/2846502120056011884YVzfXU

It has taken the Obama Democrats actually throwing Catholic sensibilities TOTALLY under the bus to wake half of these twits up. And Cardinal Dolan, God bless him, is leading the charge away from Democrat Talking Points and back toward the Gospel as Jesus Christ actually preached it.

In a recent poll of 900 self-identified Catholic registered voters, only 27% said they support Obama. With over 77 million Catholics in the United States, a drop from 54% to 27% will be devastating to Obama’s totals. Hee hee!

If you liked this, you might also enjoy https://polination.wordpress.com/2012/02/18/dolan-one-of-new-cardinals/

H/t: Pistol Pete

Source:

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/08/24/Obama-and-Social-Justice-Democrats-Tell-Catholic-Cardinal-to-Stay-Away-from-DNC

http://www.pewforum.org/Politics-and-Elections/How-the-Faithful-Voted.aspx

http://www.humanevents.com/2012/08/24/obama-catholic-support-cut-in-half-only-27-of-catholics-support-abortion-president-today-video/

Comments Off on Drawing a line in the sand

Filed under Abortion, Catholic Church, Democrats, Elections, Republicans, Timothy Dolan

Bakin’ AkinBacon

This whole Akin thing is very frustrating to me, and not for all the usual reasons. I am very distressed by the attitudes toward him that conservatives have brought to the discussion, in pretty much every venue where I’ve heard or seen him discussed. Personally, I think he’s a funny-looking, dweeby, little nerd with a bad comb-over, and not that appealing even with his mouth shut. I think his staying in the race is more about him than it is winning the Senate for the conservative cause. If the votes were cast now, he’d lose decisively against a woman who shouldn’t have a chance to win. His recent troubles, according to Rasmussen, have not just changed MO from a safe Republican Senate win, but they have also put the winning of MO’s electoral votes at risk for the Romney/Ryan ticket. These are all bad things. We can agree on all of this.

However, let’s put that part aside for a few moments, after acknowledging that if a Democrat had said something like this, not only would it not still be front-page news, but most of us would never have heard anything about it because it wouldn’t have been reported in the first place! I want to talk about the special vitriol directed towards Akin for being so stupid as to even believe such idiocy, the ignorant fool! Why ARE conservatives so angry towards him? Why do you think he’s so INCREDIBLY S.T.U.P.I.D.? I contend that many think and feel the way they do because they have been manipulated to do so. Akin is stupid because we were told from the outset that he is stupid and we can know this because only stupid people would stupidly cling to such a stupid idea from their stupidly-ignorant, stupid heads…especially from a stupid state like stupid Missouri. I could go on, but I think you get the idea. Because–politics aside–I think the media is tricking conservatives into furthering the leftist agenda, I want to present an opposing idea. Having presented it, I’ve got no further bull in this fight and won’t be out with my red cape, directing traffic. Feel free to argue it amongst yourselves, but this is my whole contribution. At least I HOPE it’s a contribution, because I am more disturbed by conservatives’ reactions to Akin’s remarks than I am by the remarks themselves. Here’s why:

I became a registered nurse in 1969. For the next 4 decades, except for maternity leaves (4), sick time, vacations, etc., I was continually employed in my chosen profession, mostly in-hospital. 30 of those years were spent in labor and delivery. At the time I became disabled, I had more working seniority than almost any other nurse in my department at the busy maternal/child tertiary center where I worked. I had professional medical experience coming out of my EARS, and during all that time, I believed the same thing Akin has just gotten in trouble for saying.

Somewhere, back in the mists of youth and time, I had heard (on more than one occasion) this issue discussed by medical people. I don’t remember when. I don’t remember who. I just know that it was presented as fact by experienced, educated people. I heard it, filed it away, and didn’t think a lot more about it. Let’s be fair–by the time ladies came to me for delivery, the question of conception had been pretty much resolved! So my line of work never required me to revisit my youthful “understanding” of this question. In fact, it was not until the Akin Bakin’ commenced, and I went online to find some documentation of this fact that he and I both KNEW, that I found out what I “knew” wasn’t really so. That was a big shock to me. I’m not sure I’ve recovered from it yet. But it’s left me with a lot of sympathy for a man whose public profile, and unfortunate conservative credentials, have caused him to be offered up as a human sacrifice on the Altar of Liberal Agendas…just for saying something that we both believed until just a few days ago. How thankful I am to be an insignificant peon!! When I make a mistake, nobody cares but me. Akin? A bipartisan lynch mob, over an honest error, and a VERY unfortunate turn-of-the-phrase in expressing it.

Personally, I like him less for what he’s done since his trouble began, than for the error that started this whole thing. But I will not attack him for getting a fact wrong…not when I’ve had the same misunderstanding, for at least 30 years, and acquired in my work in the health field,. You may object all you like to his stubbornness, his ego, his refusal to relinquish the pursuit for power, and many other legitimate concerns in this race. But to call him “stupid” is unfair. If you had had this idea (that a woman’s body has a mechanism that helps protect against pregnancy after rape), presented to you coherently, as it was to me, by sensible people you knew and trusted, and without the media–in full-throated rage–telling you upfront that it was “stupid” (and so was anyone who believed it), I think you would have made the same mistake Akin did in believing something that, when it counted, simply turned out to be NOT SO.

14 Comments

Filed under Abortion, Democrats, Elections, Republicans

THE SATURDAY GRUDGE

Posted by Pistol Pete

AN OPEN LETTER TO TODD AKIN

Congratulations.You stood on principle even after making a foolish comment you thought would pass with an apology.You’ve held elective office for 24 years.You should have realized by now the media will set republicans up at every chance and when you do say anything the slightest bit controversial they will descend on you like a pack of ravening dogs.A sincere apology is only accepted by those with grace and civility in their souls.The democrat party has none.

Crossroads GPS pulled $5 million in ads they were going to run to help you and the RNC pulled their support,still you remain defiant.Your BFF,Mike Huckabee encouraged you to stay in,even though you went from 3 points up to 12 points down to the most reviled woman in Missouri.Remember it was Huckabee who stayed in the 2008 to split the evangelical vote with Romney until the establishment eunuch McStain prevailed.We all saw how that worked out.

You boast you’ve raised $100,000 since you took your principled stance.110K is pocket money in the high stakes contest we are now embroiled in.

There are plenty of Missourians who would never vote for AireClaire,but what you have done is dampen the enthusiasm of conservatives with your obstinance.Given the inherent vote fraud that regularly occurs in St. Louis and Kansas City,you have,in effect,handed a senate seat to the least-deserving liberal bootlick in the state.Additionally,you have quite probably foisted four more agonizing years of a vile-smelling maggot from Nevada as majority leader on our beloved land.You not only have condemned yourself,but you are dragging Romney down with you.

You’re for the sanctity of life.We get that.So are most of us on the right.But we must keep things in perspective and choose the hill we want to fight on.You have, unwittingly or not,done that for all of us.Perhaps you are satisfied being a martyr for your cause,but that will be cold comfort when a wretched piece of scum is grinning broadly at her victory party election night,knowing her seat was gift-wrapped and handed to her.

Thanks again,Todd.For nothing.

48 Comments

Filed under Abortion, Democrats, Elections, Republicans, U.S. Senate

THE TUESDAY GRUDGE

Posted by Pistol Pete

It never ceases to amaze how in this age of instant communication bits of information can be spread around the world in seconds.Two days ago nobody except we political junkies ever heard of Todd Akin.Now the fate of the Senate majority may rise or fall on whether he steps down by 5:00 PM today or decides he can win with virtually no support.Recall during the Obamacare fight Ben Nelson wavered,and could have been a national hero had he not taken a bribe referred to as the ‘Cornhusker Kickback.’ Had he held to his principles Republicans from around the country would have sent him donations and he could have been a senator for as long as he wanted.Sadly,liberals are inherently cowardly and he sold the country out.He became a pariah in his home state and decided to retire rather than seek another term where he was sure to lose.Bart Stupak fell for an empty promise from the liar-in-chief and suffered the same fate.Obama used these fools to get what he wanted and then sent them off with virtually nothing to show for it.

No,it’s not right that democrats can say anything they please and are never held to account while one slip can cost a republican their carreer,but it is what it is.As William F. Buckley famously stated,don’t choose the most conservative candidate,choose the most conservative candidate WHO CAN WIN.We are all hoping Akin has a ‘come to Jesus’ moment,but I don’t hold out much hope.Maybe we are called ‘the stupid party’ for a reason.

39 Comments

Filed under Democrats, Elections, Obamacare, Republicans, U.S. Senate

Purple Strategies

A new poll of four critical swing states by Purple Strategies, taken after Mitt Romney selected Paul Ryan as his running mate. Virginia and Ohio flipped to Romney-Ryan. In Florida and Colorado, Romney-Ryan lost ground, though no change in who is ahead. Numbers below.

Summary: R&R ahead in Virginia, Ohio and Florida; O&B in Colorado. I plugged these four wins into the electoral map calculator @ 270towin. Results: Obama 210 vs. Romney 251 vs. Unsure 77. At the moment, Obama needs 60 more to win, while Romney only needs 19 more. Pennsylvania is worth 20. Just sayin’. 🙂

VIRGINIA Shift from Obama and Unsure to Romney-Ryan +4

Pre-Ryan JULY Obama 46% vs. Romney 44% vs. Unsure 10% = 100%

Post-Ryan AUG Obama 45% vs. Romney 48% vs. Unsure 8% = 101% ?

OHIO Shift from Obama to Unsure +3 and Romney-Ryan +1

Pre-Ryan JULY Obama 48% vs. Romney 45% vs. Unsure 7% = 100%

Post-Ryan AUG Obama 44% vs. Romney 46% vs. Unsure 10% = 100%

FLORIDA Shift from Unsure to Obama +2, Romney-Ryan steady, ahead by 2 less

Pre-Ryan JULY Obama 45% vs. Romney 48% vs. Unsure 7% = 100%

Post-Ryan AUG Obama 47% vs. Romney 48% vs. Unsure 5% = 100%

COLORADO Shift from Unsure to Obama +4 and from Unsure to Romney-Ryan +2

Pre-Ryan JULY Obama 45% vs. Romney 44% vs. Unsure 11% = 100%

Post-Ryan AUG Obama 49% vs. Romney 46% vs. Unsure 6% = 101% ?

I’m guessing the b.s. Obama is pimping about Medicare is the biggest thing hurting R&R right now. That ought to change once the truth gets out. Key fact: Medicare as we know it is going to end if we do nothing. Changing it is the only way to save it. The R&R plan doesn’t affect anyone 55 or older. Obama has no plan.

Source:

http://www.purplestrategies.com/wp-content/uploads/PurplePoll_Aug15_Final.pdf

1 Comment

Filed under Barack Obama, Elections, Medicare/Medicaid, Mitt Romney, Polls

That which cannot continue will not continue

Democrats have only one approach to economic policy … raise taxes and increase regulations. That is why they top the list of Worst States for Business and why companies flee them to relocate in business friendly States like Texas.

Aug 2, 2012: Afterburner with Bill Whittle: Going Out of Business! [7:03]

Chrissy’s Site Bites @ http://news.webshots.com/photo/2135048970056011884ccFNTH

Click on graphic to embiggen.

If you like this, you might also enjoy https://polination.wordpress.com/2012/08/05/printing-more-money-is-the-last-refuge-of-failed-economic-empires/

Sources:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyanosis

10 Worst States for Business 2012: Slideshow

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_states_and_blue_states

4 Comments

Filed under Bill Whittle, Democrats, Economy, Elections, Republicans, Taxes, Unemployment

Not even in the same ball park

Remember yesterday’s “dorky poll” that I showed was badly skewed?

August 2, 2012: Pew “If the election were today” poll of Registered Voters

Obama 51% vs. Romney 41% vs. Not Reported 8%

http://www.people-press.org/2012/08/02/romneys-personal-image-remains-negative/

Compare it with this one.

Friday, August 3, 2012: Rasmussen “If the election were today” poll of Likely Voters

Romney 47% vs. Obama 43% vs. Other 5% vs. Undecided 5%

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/obama_administration/daily_presidential_tracking_poll

These polls both have MOEs in the 3-4 point range. Let’s just suppose both are off by the maximum.

Pew: Obama + 10 becomes Obama +6

Rasmussen: Romney +4 becomes Tied.

They’re not even in the same ballpark. Obviously, I think Rasmussen is closer to the truth.

If you like this, you might also enjoy https://polination.wordpress.com/2012/08/03/another-dorky-poll/

Comments Off on Not even in the same ball park

Filed under Barack Obama, Elections, Mitt Romney, Polls

Another dorky poll

August 2, 2012: Pew Poll gives Obama 51% vs. Romney 41% in “If election were today” question

BUT is Obama really ten points ahead?

Party Affiliation in Pew Sample vs. Gallup Party Affiliation Poll July 19-22, 2012 (most recent) = Skew

Republican 459 = 24.5% vs. 28% = minus 3.5 points

Independent 599 = 32% vs. 41% = minus 9 points

Democrat 813 = 43.5% vs. 30% = plus 13.5 points

Total 1871 = 100% showing 17 point skew toward Democrat over Republican

Calculating the Independent skew – With “Leaners”, Gallup reports Republican 47% vs. Democrat 45%

Republican 47% – 28% = 19 points from Independents = 43%

Democrat 45% – 30% = 15 points from Independents = 34%

Independent 41% – 31 points = 10 Independents with no Lean = 23%

Rough split of the minus 9 points worth of Independents between Republican, Democrat and No Lean:

Republican 4 vs. Democrat 2 vs. None 2

Assuming I’ve done the math right (not a good assumption, I assure you!), this adds another 2 points to the skew toward Democrat over Republican, for a whopping total of 19. That’s nearly double the lead they’re showing for Obama over Romney.

So, yeah, Obama’s ahead if you mostly only ask Obama voters who they’ll vote for. Duh.

Sources @

http://www.people-press.org/2012/08/02/romneys-personal-image-remains-negative/

http://www.gallup.com/poll/15370/Party-Affiliation.aspx

H/t to GP for heads up on this one.

If you enjoyed this, you might also like https://polination.wordpress.com/2012/07/02/some-good-news-for-our-side/

1 Comment

Filed under Barack Obama, Democrats, Elections, Mitt Romney, Polls, Republicans

Show me the money

Chrissy’s Site Bites @ http://news.webshots.com/photo/2731919510056011884plapGV

Click on graphic to embiggen.

The June 2012 campaign finance reports reveal an unsurprising pattern:

Obama spent more than he took in (received $46 million, spent $58 million), while Romney spent less (received $33 million, spent $27.5 million).

July totals are due at the Federal Elections Commission by Aug. 15.

Meanwhile, Obama and his team are sending out more frequent and increasingly desperate-sounding pleas for money, howling that Romney has an unfair financial advantage.

The advantage may or may not be real when you figure in PAC and political party spending. Regardless, I think it’s a bit rich of the Obama machine to complain!

In 2008, Obama reneged on his promise to stay within the public campaign financing limits that McCain agreed to, has been fund-raising the entire time Obama’s been in the White House and did not have to spend anything on a 50 State primary fight.

A recent fund-raising email from VP Biden had the subject line: “Romney defeats Obama?” The text warned that such a headline might be possible on the day after the election if supporters don’t dig deep into their pockets now.

“Don’t let anyone convince you that this is a sure thing — our opponents have almost unlimited resources at their disposal, and we already know they’ll outspend us by a good amount,” Mr. Biden warned. “What we do now decides the headlines on November 7th.”

Romney’s campaign manager forwarded Mr. Biden’s e-mail to Romney’s list of supporters and suggested the recipient donate “to make sure the headlines read correctly in 100 days.” LOL

Sources:

http://townhall.com/tipsheet/kevinglass/2012/07/21/dont_believe_the_hype_obama_is_handily_outraising_romney

7 Comments

Filed under Barack Obama, Elections, Joe Biden, Mitt Romney

November 2012: Referendum on Big Govt in America

Make no mistake. This coming election will be nothing more nor less than our national referendum on big government. Do we want the government to continue to become bigger and more powerful? Or do we want to roll it back to something like what the Founders had in mind?

Chrissy’s Site Bites @ http://news.webshots.com/photo/2864861160056011884oRqCPA

Click on graphic to embiggen.

The choice is simple.

If you think Big Government is a benevolent nanny, like Mary Poppins, then vote Democrat.

But if you agree with Gerald Ford, that “A government big enough to give you everything you need, is a government big enough to take away everything that you have,” then vote Republican.

YOU vote it how YOU see it and let the majority choose our nation’s future.

Note:  The quote above is often attributed to Thomas Jefferson, but at the Monticello site, it says: “We have never found such a statement in Jefferson’s writings. As far as we know, this statement actually originates with Gerald R. Ford, who said [it] in an address to a joint session of Congress on August 12, 1974.” http://www.monticello.org/site/jefferson/government-big-enough-to-give-you-everything-you-wantquotation

If you like this, you might also enjoy @ https://polination.wordpress.com/2012/07/18/just-a-reminder/

1 Comment

Filed under Elections