Category Archives: Liberty

THE MONDAY GRUDGE

posted by Pistol Pete

No report yesterday;I work 6 days a week and needed to decompress.DW and I went to a flea market then toured some antique shops in some small towns within driving distance.It was nice.

BOEHNER TO RELEASE NEW PROPOSAL MONDAY
http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2011/07/24/boehner_to_release_new_proposal_monday

WHAT BOEHNER SAID TO THE CAUCUS
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/right-turn/post/exclusive-what-boehner-said-to-the-caucus/2011/03/29/gIQAhQtAXI_blog.html

THE MODERN VERSION OF THE ANT AND THE GRASSHOPPER
This is pretty good
http://www.redstate.com/izoneguy/2011/07/24/the-modern-version-of-the-ant-the-grasshopper/

OBAMA’S 2008 “HOPE” REPLACED BY 2012 “FEAR” OF REPUBLICANS
What else has he got?He sure as hell can’t run on his record!
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2011/07/24/heilemann-obamas-hope-2008-be-replaced-fear-republicans-2012#ixzz1T455Bnyh

WALKER’S VINDICATION
His budget reform saved teachers’ jobs.Will he get credit?Get real.
http://www.weeklystandard.com/articles/walker-s-vindication_577310.html?nopager=1

KRAUTHAMMER TO ‘INSIDE WASHINGTON’ HOST:”YOU MANAGE TO INTRODUCE A HELL OF A LOT OF BIAS.”

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2011/07/22/charles-krauthammer-tells-inside-washington-host-you-manage-introduce

WHEN OBAMA SUMMONS BOEHNER TO THE WHITE HOUSE,DOES HE USE A PROCESS SERVER?
http://www.redstate.com/roguepolitics/2011/07/23/when-obama-summons-boehner-to-the-white-house-does-he-use-a-process-server/

WE’D BE BETTER OF IF THE PRESIDENT’S CABINET HAD AT LEAST RUN A LEMONADE STAND

OBAMA SAVING HIMSELF
http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2011/07/24/obama_saving_himself

BLACK TEA PARTIERS TO PROTEST NAACP CONVENTION IN L.A.
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2011/07/black-tea-partiers-to-protest-naacp-national-convention-in-la/

WHAT IS LIBERTY,THAT WE MAY DEFEND IT
http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/38787

TURBO TIMMY WON’T TELL CHRIS WALLACE WHAT WILL HAPPEN IF DEBT DEILING ISN’T RAISED
http://www.mediaite.com/tv/tim-geithner-refuses-to-tell-chris-wallace-what-happens-if-debt-ceiling-isnt-raised/

Here is a development in Tacoma WA (Salishan) that was built for Illegal Immigrants! 1325 Homes created! Refugee Pay offers them $2642 per month in SSI benefits, plus Food Stamps, plus Section 8 Housing
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fu6ok5ykyuQ

OBAMA AND NATO TURN LIBYA,$30B CHECK OVER TO JIHADISTS
http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=44986

OBAMA’S FAIR DEAL:VIOLATE YOUR TAX PLEDGE SO I CAN KEEP MY PLEDGE TO REFORM ENTITLEMENTS
http://hotair.com/archives/2011/07/24/obamas-fair-deal-violate-your-tax-pledge-so-i-can-keep-my-pledge-to-reform-entitlements/

CORNEL WEST;BEST INTERVIEW EVER
http://hotair.com/archives/2011/07/24/cornel-west-best-interview-ever/

IS YOUR IRA GOING TO BE RAIDED?
Don’t think for a second this bag of bastards would hesitate to grab your investments so they can decide how much you need to live on.
http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/07/is_your_ira_going_to_be_raided.html

BILL WOULD FORCE OBAMA TO PAY SOCIAL SECURITY,MILITARY IF US DEFAULTS
http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/173155-conservatives-look-to-force-obama-to-pay-social-security-military-in-case-of-default-

‘THE DICK’ TO GOP:”YOU BREAK IT,YOU OWN IT”

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/173149-durbin-warns-boehner-you-break-it-you-own-it

UPDATED LIST OF OBAMA “FIRSTS”
THIS IS REALLY,REALLY GOOD!
http://directorblue.blogspot.com/2011/06/president-barack-obamas-complete-list.html

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xlOObkCiXqQ&feature=player_embedded

THE USES OF PETULANCE
http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2011/07/the-uses-of-petulance.php

WHITE HOUSE CONFIRMS IT WILL PROBABLY SIGN ANY DEBT DEAL CONGRESS SENDS
http://blog.heritage.org/2011/07/24/white-house-confirms-it-will-likely-sign-any-debt-deal-congress-sends/

OBAMA CANCELS FUNDRAISERS AMID DEBT NEGOTIATIONS
Color me shocked;taking time from his full-time job raising money to do what he was supposed to be doing?Must be worried.
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2011/07/24/obama-cancels-fundraisers-amidst-debt-situation/

ARRIANA HUFFINGTON:”THE STIMULUS PACKAGE FAILED”
http://dailycaller.com/2011/07/25/arianna-huffington-the-stimulus-package-failed/

20 Comments

Filed under Armed Forces, Barack Obama, Benghazi, Budget, Economy, John Boehner, Liberty, Media Bias, Social Security, Taxes, Tea Party, Timothy Geithner, U.S. Congress

These things we also deny

By John Hayward – July 7, 2011

http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=44692

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal,that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”

So says the Declaration of Independence, among the greatest documents ever produced by the human race.  It is time to declare our independence again, this time by listing the falsehoods made evident through the past century of our history.

I do not believe the government can accomplish any given task more efficiently than the private sector.  The awful record of our bankrupt State argues conclusively to the contrary.

I deny both the right and wisdom of government to “own” any industry.  Industry cannot succeed without the threat of failure, and the State never has to worry about going out of business.  Ownership is the prerogative of citizens, not the government they authorize to perform certain essential duties.

I reject the notion that a just government can exist in the absence of a strictly obeyed Constitution.  It is not an archaic document to be evaded when it interferes with the agenda of public officials.  A republic must be bound by laws that its elected representatives cannot easily change.

I deny the wisdom of the political class to achieve prosperity through economic control. Their failure is massive and evident.  I challenge them to relinquish their control, and watch the creativity and judgment of free citizens surpass their own.

I do not believe the wealth of a free citizen belongs to the government, to re-distribute in accordance with the moral judgment of the elite.

I do not believe that only government officials should be allowed to enjoy lavish benefits and extravagant lifestyles without facing moral condemnation for their greed.

I deny the possibility of a large government without endemic corruption.  It’s not just a question of electing honest people to run the super-State.  Big Government is inherently corrupt, because it replaces the freedom of choice with the power of political command, and there will always be efforts to purchase the incredibly valuable favor of powerful politicians.  If you would have honest government, you must make it smaller.

I deny the possibility of “creating” jobs.  Jobs are offered.  If you would have more of them, your fellow citizens must be willing to extend more offers.  Free people cannot be compelled to make offers.

I do not believe the election of national representatives should be a quest for brilliant masters of industry.  They should understand the limits and duties of their own jobs, not how to perform the jobs of those they rule.  If a President understands and reveres the Constitution, it doesn’t really matter if he knows anything about the manufacture of automobiles or corporate jets.  Electing politicians is not the equivalent of selecting the CEO of America, Incorporated, and Congress is not its boardroom.

I reject the application of compulsive force against citizens who have not engaged in criminal offenses.  I am not interested in being “transformed” or “engineered” by my government, and I deny its moral authority to do so against my will.

I reject the idea that the intention behind legislation is more important than its legality under the Constitution, or its actual effects.

I do not believe that the business of funding the government should be turned into an exercise in social engineering, with citizens obliged to run through a vast maze of tax penalties and exemptions, designed to encourage “correct” behavior.

I don’t think the government should be allowed to function without a budget.  Ever.  This is a mockery of the vital concept of delegated authority.  I will not grant the State the right to do as it pleases, and send taxpayers the bill later.  How can we judge the performance of government, and vote accordingly, if we are not told precisely what it plans to do?

Except in cases of the most dire emergency, I don’t accept the moral authority of today’s politicians to place unbearable obligations on the taxpayers of the future.  Taxation without representation is wrong.  Who represents the children of tomorrow?  Were their voices heard, when they were assigned to pay off fourteen trillion dollars in debt?  It’s one thing to engage in emergency deficit spending when wars or natural disasters threaten the very survival of the Republic.  Using the same techniques to encourage dependency on government, or fund the weird obsessions of bureaucrats, is an outrage.

I deny that the continuing dissolution of liberty is “progress,” while the restoration of liberty is “regressive.”  The growth of the State is not inevitable.

I do not believe the proper business of government is reducing “uncertainty” in the free market.  Opportunity only flourishes upon uncertain terrain.  The government’s job should be to reduce the artificial uncertainty generated by its own actions.  Free people should not have to worry about being crushed by the State, or watch their commercial triumphs washed away by huge subsidies to their defeated competitors.

I reject the moral authority of politicians to measure the virtue of ambition.  As long as those ambitions are legal, politicians have no right to denounce them as evil.

I will not tolerate the continued presence in office of a politician who would compromise the core duties of government to protect funding for its extravagances.  If government spending is limited, any official who would jeopardize the essential functions of government, or its financial obligations – as Barack Obama has openly threatened to do – is criminally derelict in his duties, and should be removed from office immediately.  I will not allow a government official to threaten me with the refusal to discharge his lawful duty.

I don’t believe it is wise to place control of your life in the hands of politicians, many of whom you will never be able to vote against, or massive agencies you can only influence through savage political battles, fought once every couple of years.  State control is all about transitory promises and eternal obligations.

I deny that liberty can be realized entirely through speech and action.  It cannot exist without ownership.

I deny that freedom can exist without responsibility.  No one is free unless everyone is.  That means you cannot make demands upon your neighbors that you are not willing to reciprocate.  It means the burden of financing our government should be shared by everyone, not lumped upon small populations that can be easily out-voted.  It means that people are accountable for their actions.  It is the reason a free people should embrace charity, but deny entitlement.

The Declaration of Independence announced the glory of American liberty by advancing three self-evident truths.  The never-ending struggle to retain that liberty involves combining those truths to produce an endless series of denials.  The allure of government control and dependency is great, so every free man and woman should be prepared to spend a lifetime saying “no.”  Freedom depends upon the right to say “no.”

Chrissy’s Site Bites: http://www.zazzle.com/chrissyoriginals/

1 Comment

Filed under Constitution, Liberty

Thug-ministration

By Chrissy the Hyphenated

Click to embiggen for easier reading.

Chrissy’s Site Bites: http://news.webshots.com/photo/2239635120056011884SnBByp

Business groups to Obama: Drop order on contractor disclosure

By Kevin Bogardus – 05/16/11 09:10 PM ET

http://thehill.com/business-a-lobbying/161573-business-coalition-tells-obama-to-abandon-draft-contractor-order

A coalition of more than 80 business groups told President Obama to “abandon” a draft executive order that would have government contractors disclose their political contributions. …

The letter comes as the draft order has fallen under heavy criticism from several Republicans, as well as a few Democrats. …

Democrats and the White House tried and FAILED to pass the Disclose Act last Congress, despite Democrats having a super-majority in the House and Senate.

In other words, opposition to this kind of political thuggery is bipartisan.

The Disclose Act was the Democrats’ response to the Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision in January 2010 that allowed corporations to spend unlimited funds on political activities.

Since corporations tend to support Conservative Republicans, Democrats hated this decision. Obama was so miffed, he scolded the Justices on national television during his State of the Union. One of his classier moves (not).

As I understand it, Democrats’ big supporters … big unions like the NEA and SEIU and professional Leftist groups like ACORN and Planned Parenthood … were already allowed to donate the big bucks, most of which they got by ripping off taxpayers and nearly all of which they dumped into Democrat coffers to keep their taxpayer-funded gravy trains chugging along.

But it’s not about politics. It’s about Transparency in Government! (Riight.)

For more info:

43 House Conservatives Urge President Obama to Withdraw Proposed Executive Order – May 17, 2011

http://rsc.jordan.house.gov/news/DocumentSingle.aspx?DocumentID=241754

Why Does the Obama Administration Want to Know Your Political Beliefs Before They Give You a Job? By Dana Perino – May 19, 2011

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2011/05/19/does-obama-administration-want-know-political-beliefs-job/

2 Comments

Filed under Barack Obama, Democrats, Equality, Liberty, Planned Parenthood, Republicans, Supreme Court, Unions

Equality: Part 3

Whenever I hear politicians or social theorists decry income inequality, I always want to ask them how they think “income equality” could be achieved. As far as I can see, the only way to accomplish such a thing would be for the government to confiscate 100% of everything that everyone earns, and then write a check for an identical amount to every citizen. Not even the most left-wing politicians would be reckless enough to advocate that publicly, so they cook up alternate schemes to accomplish the same thing without resorting to such drastic measures as cold-turkey collectivization.

Progressive taxation is their favorite ploy, mostly because it’s so popular with people in lower tax brackets, and even more popular among people who don’t pay taxes at all. (Incidentally, progressive taxation is also completely unconstitutional, since it violates the guarantee of equal protection of the law, but that’s a subject for another column.) The money thus taken from higher earners can then be distributed to lower earners and non-earners through a mind-boggling array of income transfer programs. Although these schemes have proven depressingly effective at vote buying, they have utterly failed at the goal of eradicating “income inequality.” Continue reading

1 Comment

Filed under Constitution, Equality, Liberty

Equality: Part 2

Last time, I argued that equality under the law is the only equality that is worth having. Without it, the rights of a privileged few are safe — at least as long as they’re able to hang onto their privileged status — but everyone else’s rights can be trampled underfoot any time the folks in power find it to their advantage to do so. That’s one reason why countries that lack equal protection of the law are such hellholes, and why their primary export tends to be their own people, who flee them in droves and head for places like the United States, which they see as the land of opportunity.

Any other type of equality, however, is overrated at best, and at worst it’s downright dangerous. The reason is that when we make a fetish of equality, and consider it an unalloyed good, then we come to view inequality as an unalloyed evil. “Inequality” becomes synonymous in our minds with “injustice.”

But let’s be honest: “Inequality” is just another word for “difference.” Notice how when you call it a “difference,” its nefarious connotations vanish into thin air? Continue reading

4 Comments

Filed under Equality, Liberty

Equality: Part 1

This is the first of what will be a series of columns on the subject of equality. I’ll begin by stating the obvious: that the concept of equality is extremely popular. Take an informal poll – call a dozen random names from the phone book, or stop a dozen folks on the street, and ask them whether equality is a good thing – and the odds are good that all of them will answer in the affirmative. Some will even question your sanity for having raised the question in the first place.

Equality is so universally popular that saying unkind things about it is tantamount to heresy. But I’ll be committing many acts of heresy in this series, because the truth is that I consider equality to be overrated. There are many reasons, some of which will be the topics of future installments, but chief among them is the fact that I love liberty. And in general, the more liberty there is, the less equality there will be. You can have one or the other, but not both.  Continue reading

6 Comments

Filed under Equality, Law, Liberty