Category Archives: Republicans

The “civility” of the Left UPDATED

Click on graphics to embiggen.


Chrissy’s Site Bites @ http://news.webshots.com/photo/2955695110056011884ZKSnzO

Obama Supporters: Vandals and Thieves
Warning: VERY graphic content. [2:46]

Watch Obama supporters “gone wild” with attempts to silence speech; to steal, vandalize, deface and destroy conservative political signs; and to intimidate through violent, aggressive behavior. The party of bumper sticker “tolerance” and “co-exist” mantras, reveals its true nature in this shocking expose.

8 Comments

Filed under Democrats, Republicans

This photo says it all

Conservative Republicans, Tea Partiers, Right Wingnuts … whatever your label for me and mine … we get called a lot of bad names by our political adversaries.

The two biggest being that we’re selfish and racist.

Well, we’re not. I’m not going to belabor this with all y’all. You know what I’m talking about. I just wanted to share this photo, because it really spoke to me about who I am and why I have abandoned the Liberal Democrat label and put my votes and political efforts behind the people who actually CARE about everybody, regardless of race, color, creed, gender, size, or place of residence.

4 Comments

Filed under Democrats, Republicans

A little fact-checking of debate statements

October 3, 2012 Presidential debate videos embedded in seven parts @

http://www.therightscoop.com/obama-vs-romney-presidential-debate-open-thread/

H/t to Pistol Pete for the link. The CSB graphics used here are already up at Webshots. I’m just reusing them.

TRUTH: During the first 3 minutes of Part Two, Romney says,

The president said he’d cut the deficit in half. Unfortunately, he doubled it. Trillion dollar deficits for the past four years. The president has put in almost as much debt held by the public as all prior presidents combined.”

LIE: Shortly after, at about 2:30, Obama says,

“When I walked into the Oval Office, I had more than a trillion dollar deficit greeting me.”

When Obama walked into the Oval Office, the 2009 budget that greeted him had been signed in 2008 by President Bush. But it had been passed by a Democrat-majority Congress, of which Senator Obama was a part. That budget contained a projected deficit of about $500 Billion.

The total deficit for 2009 rose to the “more than a trillion dollar” ONLY AFTER the Democrat-majority Congress and PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA passed the 2009 stimulus spending bill, an act that ADDED more than $800 Billion to that year’s deficit.

Obama also says, “We know where it came from”, and couches all the blame in such a way that Democrats are totally blameless … which is a lie. As you can see in the graph above, under the Republican-majority Congress, the deficits were coming DOWN. It was only after Democrats won control of the House and Senate, under Pelosi and Reid (with Obama in the Senate), that federal “credit card” spending sky-rocketed.

8 Comments

Filed under Barack Obama, Debates, Democrats, Harry Reid, Mitt Romney, Nancy Pelosi, National Debt, Republicans

Does this mean I’ve hit the big time?

I love it! 🙂

Click on graphic to embiggen.

The article is @ http://newsbusters.org/blogs/matthew-sheffield/2012/09/29/polling-industry-has-historically-underestimated-gop-vote

Why The Polls Understate Romney Vote By Dick Morris – September 21, 2012
http://www.dickmorris.com/why-the-polls-under-state-romney-vote/

Republicans are getting depressed under an avalanche of polling suggesting that an Obama victory is in the offing. They, in fact, suggest no such thing! Here’s why:

1. All of the polling out there uses some variant of the 2008 election turnout as its model for weighting respondents and this overstates the Democratic vote by a huge margin.

In English, this means that when you do a poll you ask people if they are likely to vote. But any telephone survey always has too few blacks, Latinos, and young people and too many elderly in its sample. That’s because some don’t have landlines or are rarely at home or don’t speak English well enough to be interviewed or don’t have time to talk. Elderly are overstated because they tend to be home and to have time. So you need to increase the weight given to interviews with young people, blacks and Latinos and count those with seniors a bit less.

Normally, this task is not difficult. Over the years, the black, Latino, young, and elderly proportion of the electorate has been fairly constant from election to election, except for a gradual increase in the Hispanic vote. You just need to look back at the last election to weight your polling numbers for this one.

But 2008 was no ordinary election. Blacks, for example, usually cast only 11% of the vote, but, in 2008, they made up 14% of the vote. Latinos increased their share of the vote by 1.5% and college kids almost doubled their vote share. Almost all pollsters are using the 2008 turnout models in weighting their samples. Rasmussen, more accurately, uses a mixture of 2008 and 2004 turnouts in determining his sample. That’s why his data usually is better for Romney.

But polling indicates a widespread lack of enthusiasm among Obama’s core demographic support due to high unemployment, disappointment with his policies and performance, and the lack of novelty in voting for a black candidate now that he has already served as president.

If you adjust virtually any of the published polls to reflect the 2004 vote, not the 2008 vote, they show the race either tied or Romney ahead, a view much closer to reality.

2. Almost all of the published polls show Obama getting less than 50% of the vote and less than 50% job approval. A majority of the voters either support Romney or are undecided in almost every poll.

But the fact is that the undecided vote always goes against the incumbent. In 1980 (the last time an incumbent Democrat was beaten), for example, the Gallup Poll of October 27th had Carter ahead by 45-39. Their survey on November 2nd showed Reagan catching up and leading by three points. In the actual voting, the Republican won by nine. The undecided vote broke sharply — and unanimously — for the challenger.

An undecided voter has really decided not to back the incumbent. He just won’t focus on the race until later in the game.

So, when the published poll shows Obama ahead by, say, 48-45, he’s really probably losing by 52-48!

Add these two factors together and the polls that are out there are all misleading. Any professional pollster (those consultants hired by candidates not by media outlets) would publish two findings for each poll — one using 2004 turnout modeling and the other using 2008 modeling. This would indicate just how dependent on an unusually high turnout of his base the Obama camp really is.

6 Comments

Filed under Democrats, Elections, Polls, Republicans

Pray for bad weather!

We KNOW they’re skewing the polls to make Obama look like a shoo-in and discourage Republicans from going to the polls.

But I have a theory this could work against them … especially if the weather is lousy. Why get cold and wet if Teh Won is a shoo-in, right?

At PoliNation, I’ve been proposing, only half in jest, that we pray for bad weather. Tonight, I saw the article below, and I’m removing the half that was jest.

Political analysts admit that bad weather hurts Democrats, but has little effect on Republicans!

So do it! Pray for gray, cold, wet and windy. Beseech God to send sleet and snow showers to every Blue district in the nation.

And then make sure YOU and YOURS get to the polls. Share a dog sled if you have to. This election may well be the most important one in our nation’s history. It fershure is the most important you and I will see in our lifetimes.

October 26, 2010 – Bad news for Dems: Rain in the forecast for 2010 Election Day
http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/house-races/125791-more-bad-news-for-dems-rain-in-the-forecast-for-election-day

In more bad news for Democrats, rain is in the forecast for much of the country on Election Day. According to Laurel Harbridge, a Northwestern University political science professor, GOP voters are not typically discouraged by rain. “Republicans are helped by bad weather … it does harm Democratic prospects.”

Other poll stories in the news:

It’s beginning to look a lot like 1980: “analysis shows most polls gave Reagan a narrow lead following the convention fallout, a lead which only blew open after the October debate. In 2012, the picture looks similarly close after the dust has settled from the party conventions” @
http://www.wnd.com/2012/09/its-beginning-to-look-a-lot-like-1980/

Unskewed polls show nearly 8 pt Romney lead: “Not a single major poll or approval/disapproval index favors Obama when Unskewed.com’s analysis is applied. The website says there is Democratic bias in polling because of over-sampling Democrats based on voter exit polls in the 2008 presidential election, when enthusiasm for a then relatively unknown but charismatic presidential candidate boosted Democratic Party voter registration and turnout to historic levels.” @ http://www.wnd.com/2012/09/unskewed-polls-show-nearly-8-point-romney-lead/

Comments Off on Pray for bad weather!

Filed under Democrats, Elections, Republicans

Colorado Democrats Oust Clergyman

Chrissy’s Site Bites @ http://news.webshots.com/photo/2561075320056011884NBHRoJ

Click on graphic to embiggen.

If you like this, you might also want to read @ https://polination.wordpress.com/2012/09/10/pray-for-them/

Source:

Dems boot pastor as debate moderator

9 Comments

Filed under Democrats, Republicans

Pie vs Lake

Democrats believe the economy is like a pie. There’s a fixed amount of good stuff and the people who have bigger pieces got them at the expense of those with smaller pieces. If they’re right, then I’d have to agree it’s not fair for some to get bigger pieces and some to get smaller pieces.

But they’re not right. Pie is finite. You cut it up, serve it out, eat it, wash the dishes and that’s that. It’s gone. The economy is nothing like that.

So maybe Democrats aren’t thinking about a single pie so much as about a pie factory, where everybody has a right to the exact same number of pies, but some folks budge their way to the front of the line and hog more pies, so the folks at the back of the line get fewer or none. If that were right, then I’d have to agree that we should have rationing, like they did during World War II, so everyone got what they needed.

But it’s not right. The economy isn’t a factory that produces x amount of the exact same stuff every day, day after day. It grows and it shrinks. And the stuff it produces changes over time, just like factories do. In fact, the factory metaphor is less like the Democrat’s false pie metaphor than it is like the true Republican metaphor, except we usually use boats, instead of pies. Maybe that’s because we aren’t so obsessed with what other people eat or something. I dunno.

My point is that Republicans understand that the economy is not fixed, but that it can grow or shrink, like the level of the water on a lake. The economy is also not stagnant, like a pie factory that produces the same amount of the same stuff every day. Technology makes it possible for more people to have more and better stuff.

When I was a kid, we were solidly middle class. My dad had a job and a small business; my mom was a full-time homemaker who kept the books for his business in her spare time. Our home had one television, one rotary telephone (hard wired to the wall), and a single full bathroom for our family of 8.

When I was a teen, my folks put in a powder room on the ground floor, added a television in the master bedroom and a telephone line for the business. There was no call waiting then and most homes still had only one line, so I was one of the fortunate few who had no timer running when I was on the phone. After business hours, I could use the business line to call anyone I liked (locally) for as long as I liked. And I didn’t have to rotary dial anymore, because we got push buttons. We even had an intercom system! It was very posh; way cooler than what my friends’ houses had.

Raising my family, our home was similar, with a bath and a half and a business line the kids could use after hours. But because of the business, we had a computer in the house before most of the neighbors. Still, when my kids were little, one of them asked if we were poor and I said, “No, of course not. What makes you ask?” She replied, “Because we don’t have a pool.” For some reason, a bunch of the families on our street had installed pools that summer. We hadn’t. Ergo, we might be poor.

But when I was a teen-ager and the fifth of six kids, nobody had pools. It was a big deal when a family like ours could afford a second car. I remember when we got ours. And we did not live where there was much in the way of public transportation. My folks just made do with sharing that one car with his two jobs and their six kids. We walked a lot. In fact, I walked to and from summer school one year. It was three miles (literally), but only uphill one way. 🙂

If the economy were a fixed product pie factory, we would still have the same amount and kind of stuff that our grandparents had. Only the wealthy would have cars and phones and multiple bathrooms. That is exactly what they had in the U.S.S.R., which is why so many of us are so adamantly opposed to Socialism.

I visited Leningrad and Moscow in 1972; the trip was my one present from my folks for every holiday, including high school graduation, for the entire year. Russian women all wore the exact same hat and had the exact same boots, because that is all that the stores had to sell. We stayed in one of the better hotels, but there were no private baths, never mind television. We had to truck to the community bathroom down the hall, which was darned scary at night, when they turned most of the lights off in the hallways.

The phone connections, even room-to-room, were full of static. And where we saw ads at home touting the softness and absorbency of this brand of toilet tissue over that one, in the Soviet Union, the paper they provided in the jons came in small, single sheets, shiny on one side and rough on the other. Greasy spoon diners put better stuff in their chrome napkin dispensers.

We were just ordinary, middle-class kids on a high school tour, but our guide envied us. Compared to her, we were not just wealthy in terms of money and nice clothes and sturdy suitcases, but because we could go to school where we liked, pursue any career we chose and leave the country of our birth. She wanted to stay at home with her young child; the State did not permit that. She wanted to choose a career, but the State gave her only two options, of which tour guide was the less objectionable.

Wealth is not about money. It’s about stuff and it’s about freedom. Real poverty is when basic needs are not met and you aren’t free to choose your destiny. From there on up, it’s all a matter of degree and personal perception. I remember reading a story about a guy who grew up in an isolated rural area. He said he didn’t know that elsewhere, having an unpainted house meant you were poor. Where he lived, having a house meant you were rich. My teen clique thought I was rich because we had a second phone line. My young daughter thought we might be poor because we didn’t have a pool.

The economy really is more like a lake. When it is good and growing, the water rises and everyone’s situation gets better. When the economy is bad and shrinking, the water drops and everyone’s situation gets worse. Democrats can sneer all they want at “trickle down economics”; that IS how the economy works.

As a caring, compassionate Christian, I am not concerned with how big and fancy the rich peoples’ yachts are. Rich people won’t go hungry during an economic down turn and envy is a sin.

I AM concerned with how small and leaky the poor folks’ rafts are. Democrats say they care about the middle and lower classes, but their policies have forced people who were just getting by in 2008 to lose their homes and their dignity.

I’m all for safety nets, especially where young children, the elderly and the disabled are involved. We owe our retired citizens the pensions they were promised. But the Bible says those who will not work should not eat. Even there, Obama’s policies have failed by making it impossible for the millions who WANT jobs to find meaningful, full-time work.

Click on graphic to embiggen.

The Obama Democrats’ policies and rhetoric have not just harmed us economically; they have also harmed us morally by encouraging class envy and racial division. They talk a lot about how they’re the caring and compassionate ones and how Republicans are all greedy and selfish. But when I compare the fruits of their policies with the fruits of Republican policies, I come to the inescapable conclusion that Democrats are wrong on all counts.

I suspect some of them actually know it and are deliberately destroying our nation economically and morally, which means they’re not just wrong, but also evil.

6 Comments

Filed under Christianity, Democrats, Economy, Republicans, Unemployment

More empty seats on the Obama bandwagon

Chrissy’s Site Bites @ http://news.webshots.com/photo/2921762210056011884lDfNiK

Click on graphic to embiggen.

The former Executive Director of the Florida Democratic Party has publicly renounced Obama and thrown his support behind Romney. Barney Bishop published an op-ed encouraging other Democrats to put aside party loyalty for the sake of the nation:

In every challenge that faces our nation, Obama sees a solution that can only come with another government-spending program. He fails to harness the ingenuity of entrepreneurs; instead he actually places obstacles, like burdensome regulation, in front of their path to progress.

[Obama’s] attacks on the work Mitt Romney did in private equity demonstrates a dangerous lack of understanding how important risk-taking investors are in the U.S. economy.

[Unlike Obama], Romney has a plan for cutting and capping the government’s spending to bring us balanced budgets. He gets that job creators need less regulation and stable tax policy in order to invest and grow.

If you like this, you might also want to read @ https://polination.wordpress.com/2012/09/14/jet-lag-vs-gross-incompetence/

Sources:

http://firstread.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/09/18/13944296-nbcwsj-poll-obamas-approval-on-foreign-policy-drops

http://freebeacon.com/fla-dem-abandons-obama/

4 Comments

Filed under Barack Obama, Benghazi, Chris Stevens, Democrats, Egypt, Elections, Mitt Romney, Republicans, Valerie Jarrett

THE MONDAY GRUDGE

Posted by Pistol Pete

A SHORT WEEKEND ROUNDUP

(as best as I can remember them)

The White House has seized on the lame excuse of blaming 20 Middle East countries in flames over a stupid movie.The Libyan President has said the attacks were months in planning.McLame said protesters don’t bring RPG’s and heavy weapons to a demonstration.No matter,Obamao will use any excuse to defer blame from his disastrous  foreign policy.Of course,the media will dutifully report anything he says as gospel.We all see what’s going on and it’s so frustrating to watch him get away with it.The Obama regime and the state department have circled the wagons and will take no more questions on why they took no action when reports said they were warned up to three months before the planned attacks to comemmorate 9/11.

Madame pantsuit personally ordered no Marine security for the Libyan embassy,but Valerie Rasputin received full Secret Service protection for her vacation to Martha’s Vineyard last week.

The Chicago teacher’s union got a new proposal late last week.Moby Dickless said they had to have 2 days to look it over.Apparently they had to find a kid who was educated in private school to read it to them.Yesterday they summarily rejected the proposal and Tiny Dancer is threatening to go to court to order them back to work.I heard an audio this morning from Karen Lewis saying ‘the elephant in the room is the closing of 200 schools.’ I always thought the elephant in the room was that brown behemoth.

It seems Romney is in a difficult position.Republicans want him to define what his plans would be as president and the administration sits on its hands waiting for their media lapdogs to shred anything he says to detract from this epic failure.Polls go up and down but it seems some repubs are panicking because they think obama should be dead and buried by now.

In Wisconsin the libs found a sympathetic judge in Madison to rule the collective bargaining rights law was unconstitutional.Of course,this will be overruled,but they never quit.They are fighting to get the voter ID law overturned,but the SOS said they would enforce it anyway.

This is being posted late because our power went out about 7AM as I was in the middle of typing this and just came back on 4 hours later.Oh,well.Caught up on some reading anyway.

A LOT OF US FEEL THE SAME WAY,KID

39 Comments

Filed under Barack Obama, Benghazi, Democrats, Hillary Clinton, Media Bias, Mitt Romney, Muslim Brotherhood, Rahm Emanuel, Republicans, State Department, Terrorism, Unions, Valerie Jarrett, Voter ID

Lions and Tigers and Rich People, Oh My!

In late June, 2012, Obama sent out a fundraising email predicting Rich Republicans would buy the White House for Mitt Romney.

“We can be outspent and still win — but we can’t be outspent 10 to 1 and still win,” Obama said.

That’s such a crock! As of today (Sept 15, 2012), the Obama campaign has spent MORE THAN DOUBLE what the Romney campaign has spent. When other spending (e.g., PACs) is added in, Republican spending has exceeded Democrat by less than 3% and that INCLUDES all the money that went toward Romney’s primary battles.

Another item for my Juvenile Fundraisers list.

Sources:

http://content.usatoday.com/communities/theoval/post/2012/06/obama-ill-be-first-president-to-be-outspent/1#.UFTsPK4Z6t8

http://elections.nytimes.com/2012/campaign-finance

10 Comments

Filed under Barack Obama, Democrats, Mitt Romney, Republicans