Category Archives: Barack Obama

Obama issues two more Royal Decrees

Friday, January 3, 2014: The Obama Administration announced more Executive Orders to further restrict who has a right to privacy and who can own a gun.

Under the guise of protecting us from crazy people, Obamacrats are going to data mine health insurance records to identify people they can ban from gun ownership because of alleged mental health issues.

The Soviets and the Nazis used that mental health thing to justify imprisoning, torturing and killing political dissidents without trial. Remember when we had a government for the people, by the people? Good times.

“Friday news dump” announcements have traditionally been used to try to avoid media scrutiny. Not that the media will scrutinize anything remotely like this. Just the opposite. The LeftStreamMedia is all about Squirrel Journalism.

  • Oh look, George Bush! BLOOD FOR OIL! CINDY SHEEHAN!
  • Oh look, George Zimmerman! RAAAAACISTS WITH GUNS!
  • Oh look, Phil Robertson! CHRISTIANS WITH BIBLES!

Media guide to protesters

Think back on the Big Stories of the past 6 or 7 years. What do they have in common?

  1. They all promote wrath toward the people who hold dear the traditional values upon which our once-great nation was founded.
  2. They all distract from the loss of our freedoms, the destruction of our economy, the weakening of our military and the disarming, demoralizing, and deChristianizing of our citizens.

Submit or die

Personally, I am convinced the Leftocrats are doing all this so we will be too weak to step in as global playground monitor when they make their bid to take over the world.

Source:

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2014/01/03/obama-administrations-two-quiet-new-executive-actions-on-who-can-buy-a-gun/

H/t Cherry

Comments Off on Obama issues two more Royal Decrees

Filed under Barack Obama, George W. Bush, George Zimmerman, Gun Control, Media Bias, Phil Robertson

Update: Court challenges to HHS Mandate UPDATED

UPDATE 1: Dec 31, 2013 at 4:58 pm An emergency injunction granted just moments ago in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit means that Priests for Life will not have to obey the contraception mandate contained in the Affordable Care Act as its appeal is being heard. It also means that, tomorrow, Priests for Life will not have to cancel health insurance for its employees.

http://www.priestsforlife.org/pressreleases/4846-priests-for-life-wins-emergency-relief-from-the-unjust-hhs-mandate

UPDATE 2: Tuesday night, Supreme Court Justice Sotomayor acted on an emergency request from an order of Catholic nuns in Colorado to block the HHS Mandate starting January 1. Justice Sotomayor is giving the government until Friday morning to respond to her decision. … SOTOMAYOR blocked the HHS Mandate?! Did the sun set in the East or something?

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/01/us/politics/justice-sotomayor-blocks-contraception-mandate-in-health-law.html

OBAMA All your conscience are belong to us

  • December 16, 2013: U.S. District Court Judge Brian Cogan in the Eastern District of New York ruled FOR religious liberty in Roman Catholic Archdiocese of New York v. Sebelius.
  •  
  • December 19, 2013: U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan in the Eastern District of New York ruled AGAINST religious liberty in Priests for Life v. Sebelius.

Dec 23, 2013: Fr. Frank Interviewed on Fox News about the HHS Mandate [0:49]

Priests for Life is appealing and has declared that, regardless of the outcome, they will NOT comply with the HHS Mandate.

If you want to help with their legal expenses:

Check

  • Priests for Life
  • PO Box 141172
  • Staten Island, NY 10314

If you have any questions, call Priests for Life toll-free at 888-735-3448.

Sources:

My Priests for Life email

http://www.priestsforlife.org/

RULING: Roman Catholic Archdiocese of New York v. Sebelius @

Click to access 20131216_EDNY_%20opinion.pdf

NY Judge Rules against Government on HHS Mandate

NY Judge Rules against Government on HHS Mandate – UPDATE

FILING: Priests for Life v. Sebelius @

Click to access priests-for-life-v-sebelius.pdf

[I couldn’t find a ruling or a news report on the Priests for Life case, maybe because it was a dismissal. As I understand it, the judge just said, “Go away, fools.” Or something.]

Comments Off on Update: Court challenges to HHS Mandate UPDATED

Filed under Barack Obama, Catholic Church, HHS, Obamacare, Sonia Sotomayor, Supreme Court

How vindictive are they really?

According to a post at the National Liberty Foundation, President Barack Obama himself may have instigated the attempt to crush the Duck Dynasty show during an off-the-record meeting with high profile liberal journalists in late November during which he suggested they could do to the Robertsons what they had done to Paula Deen.

Deen slams MOOCH, Deen loses tv spot

I have NO idea if the alleged “Barack sics MSM on Phil” thing is legit. For all I know, the story started at the Onion or some other satire site.

What I find troubling is that it is SO VERY EASY FOR ME TO BELIEVE that our President and First Lady would not just deliberately target the reputations and livelihoods of individual Americans for failing to toe the Leftie Line, but that it wouldn’t bother their stone-dead consciences in the least to do so.

Do you get what I’m saying here? Whether they actually did it to Paula and/or Phil is almost BESIDE THE POINT.  They have shown themselves to be the kind of people who would and could. And they live in the White House.

Sources:

3 Comments

Filed under Barack Obama, Michelle Obama, Phil Robertson

#PajamaBoy

The folks at Organizing for Action (also known as @BarackObama) won’t rest until everyone spends this holiday season talking about health insurance. Then, when they eventually do rest, they’ll do it in plaid onesies, apparently.

PajamaBoy says talk about insurance

Tweeters celebrated #PajamaBoy with much well-deserved mockery.

  • Waxed and tweezed eyebrows in footie pajamas with hot chocolate. Gee what can I make fun of here?
  • People wouldn’t need to #GetTalking if the policy were good enough to sell itself. Just sayin’.
  • Only a man in a onesie would sit around drinking hot chocolate and talk about ObamaCare.
  • Obama appeals to the core “grown man in a onesie” demographic.
  • Desperation, thy name is obamacare!!
  • I can’t think of anything that I’d discuss with a grown man wearing a onesie.
  • It’s not the pajamas, it’s the arched eyebrows that scream “Thought Leader”
  • Words are simply inadequate to describe the spiral galaxy sized suck of that tweet. Yet I will persevere.
  • If I were sitting with #PajamaBoy, health insurance would be way down on the list of things we needed to talk about.
  • The odds of that douchebag being in my home are nil.
  • But Douche Baggery Is No Longer A Pre-Existing Condition That Insurers Can Use To Deny Coverage.
  • Is Testosterone therapy covered?
  • Will there be a pillow fight too?
  • Is this sissy ALL that OFA can come up with to persuade young people to buy into obamacare?!?
  • At boot camp, they make soldiers wear those glasses. They’re called BCGs. Birth Control Glasses.
  • So what you’re saying is … we’ve found Obamacare’s free contraceptives?
  • Look at how they portray the American male: a hot chocolate drinking doofus in a onesie. Disgraceful.
  • The person is androgynous, ethnically neutral, yet still manages to elicit feelings of great loathing and repugnance.
  • Keep in mind. #PajamaBoy has to be over 26. Otherwise he/she would be on parents’ insurance. Makes it even more sad.
  • Ew … now that really is depressing.

No, what’s really depressing is THIS:

Government propaganda 1943 - 2013

But former Illinois congressman Joe Walsh had a nifty reply:

2013_12 18 Joe Walsh reply to PajamaBoy

Photoshoppers got in on the action, natch. This is my fave … and not just cuz Angelaisms did it AND made Twitchy with it!

Angela's PajamaBoy

Sources:

13 Comments

Filed under Barack Obama, Funny Stuff, Insurance, Obamacare

OBAMACARE: Rebel or Die

OBAMACARE You can't keep your plan

The Obamacrats have made it clear they are not going to do the right thing by us and repeal their disaster of a healthcare law. Obama went so far as to say there was NO WAY the law would be repealed as long as he is in office.

That’s not technically true.

  • PPACA (aka, ACA) could be repealed by Congress with a simple majority vote in the House and Senate, though the latter won’t happen with a Democrat majority under Harry Reid running the Senate.
  • If Republicans win the Senate majority next fall, they could pass a law overturning Obamacare.
  • Obama would certainly veto this law, but a presidential veto can be legally overturned by a two-thirds majority vote in Congress.

Keep in mind that “Obamacare” includes not just the ACA, but also the bazillion heinous regulations subsequently inflicted on us by an unelected band of pro-abortion Obamacrats.

OBAMACARE has 2 parts - PPACA and regulations

There are signs of hope!

  • Eleven Republican physicians are running for U.S. Senate on a “Repeal Obamacare” platform.
  • South Carolina and Georgia are moving to outlaw Obamacare within their own borders. Former New Jersey Superior Court Judge Andrew Napolitano says the states do have the power to do that.
  • A legal challenge has targeted the unconstitutional origins of the PPACA itself. SCOTUS ruled that the ACA’s penalty for non-compliance is not a fine, but a tax. The Constitution says tax laws must originate in the House. The PPACA originated in the Senate.

Another avenue open to individuals is to refuse to participate in the exchanges. If a majority of us do so, maybe the damn thing will collapse under the weight of its own pretensions.

OBAMACARE Rebel or Die

Source:

3 Comments

Filed under Barack Obama, Democrats, Obamacare, Republicans, Supreme Court, Taxes, U.S. Congress

If Øcare is so great, then why don’t they want it?

OBAMACARE Exempt

March 2010: Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA)

PPACA Section 1312(d)(3)(D) (enacted as public law 111-148) requires all members of Congress and congressional staff to get Obamacare.

(D) MEMBERS OF CONGRESS IN THE EXCHANGE-

(i) REQUIREMENT – Notwithstanding any other provision of law, after the effective date of this subtitle, the only health plans that the Federal Government may make available to Members of Congress and congressional staff with respect to their service as a Member of Congress or congressional staff shall be health plans that are:

I) created under this act; or

II) offered through an Exchange established under this Act (or an amendment made by this Act).

July-August 2013: President Obama, Members of Congress and Karen Archuleta – Obama’s appointed head the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) – meet in closed door sessions to discuss the troubling (to them) fact that under Obamacare, they would not only lose their gold-plated healthcare coverage, but they’d also lose the hefty percentage of the premiums that taxpayers kick in as “employer contributions.”

Sept 2013: OPM issued a 17-page document unilaterally overturning Section 1312(d)(3)(D) of the Obamacare LAW, so Members of Congress can stay on their cushy plans-with-benefits and not have to endure the odious high costs and rotten coverage that PPACA is forcing on the rest of us.

Do these people need taxpayers helping out with their premiums? Hmmmmm, let me think.

  • Annual salary for President Barack Obama (D) = $400,000
  • Annual salary for Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) = $174,000
  • Annual salary for House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA): $193,400
  • (These amounts are ONLY their personal salaries. They do not include the additional moneys allocated for staff, travel and other perqs.)

Senator Vitter (R-Louisiana) responded to this OPM law breaking with Senate Bill 1497: “No Exemption for Washington from Obamacare Act.” Co-sponsors of the bill include Ted Cruz, Ted Inhofe, Michael Enzi, Ron Johnson, Dean Heller, Lindsey Graham, and Mike Lee.

  • In order for this legislation to be brought to the floor of the Senate, it must be approved by the Senate Majority Leader.
  • The current Senate Majority Leader is Senator Harry Reid (D-Nevada) who routinely blocks any bill presented by Republicans, even if they’ve been passed in the House by a bi-partisan majority and are popular with the people.
  • Senator Reid has refused to allow Vitter’s bill to even be DISCUSSED by the Senate, never mind brought to a vote. As long as the Democrats hold a majority of the seats in the Senate, this situation will not change.

Source:

1 Comment

Filed under Barack Obama, Harry Reid, Kathleen Sebelius, Nancy Pelosi, Obamacare, U.S. Congress, U.S. Senate

Liar of the Year 2013

Obama: Politifacts Liar of the Year 2013 [1:26]

2013_12 Obama Liar of the Year 2013

Comments Off on Liar of the Year 2013

Filed under Barack Obama, Insurance, Obamacare

Obama the Oblivious

2013_12 13 Obama the Oblivious

Source:

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/366183/obama-oblivious-charles-krauthammer

3 Comments

Filed under Barack Obama, Insurance, Obamacare

The Unemployment Rate Bait-and-Switch

The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) has been calculating the Unemployment Rate every month since January 1948. During Bill Clinton’s first year in office, his administration cooked up a new category called Discouraged Workers (jobless American who want work, but have stopped looking because the job market is so bad). Since January 1994, the BLS has been EXCLUDING these jobless workers from the official Unemployment Rate.

BLS Compl Hist Unemployment Rate 1948 to 2013

Common sense would dictate that Discouraged Workers be tracked as a subset of the Unemployed, not excluded like they were somehow not unemployed anymore. But since when do Democrats ever use common sense? Clinton’s statistical chicanery has had a really screwy side-effect that Democrats exploit to their political benefit:

  • When the economy is BAD, more people become discouraged enough to quit looking so the BLS moves them from Unemployed to Discouraged. Net result: The Unemployment Rate goes DOWN.
  • When the economy IMPROVES, more people become encouraged enough to start looking for work again so the BLS moves them from Discouraged to Unemployed. Net result: The Unemployment Rate goes UP.

This allows the Lamestream Media to spin the monthly jobless reports in a way that most benefits Democrats. Since it’s been Obama in the Oval Office during our latest period of historically bad joblessness, the MSM trumpets each “improved” Unemployment Rate report as yet another sign of Teh Won’s wonderfulness.

And if you happen to mention that Obama is the first president to create more than a MILLION jobless workers too depressed to get off the couch, then you’re a dirty RAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAACIST TEA BAGGER

BLS Compl Hist Discouraged Wkrs 1994 - 2013

If the economy were to improve under Obama (not holding my breath), the Unemployment Rate would rise, at which point the talking heads would carefully explain to us at great length and with lots of experts and charts that it was because Discouraged Workers were now re-entering the job market, so woohoo Obama!

Sources:

BLS: Unemployment Rate @ http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS14000000.

The official (but faux) “total unemployment” rate used for media and political sound bytes and headlines. This statistic is reported as a percent of the employable population, which includes civilian, non-institutionalized Americans ages 16 and over, so basically not soldiers, jailbirds or children. The total employable population number changes.

BLS: Discouraged Workers @ http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNU05026645.

This statistic is reported as an actual number of individuals, not as a percent of employable population, making it very difficult to correlate with the Unemployment Rate.

NOTE: These time series pages are easy to use, but really hard to find at the BLS website. If you want to access them again, bookmark them. 

H/t itooktheredpill for my bookmarks!

P.S., If it makes you angry that the tax-funded Bureau of Labor Statistics has been corrupted by Democrats, join the club.

6 Comments

Filed under Barack Obama, Bill Clinton, Democrats, Economy, George W. Bush, Republicans, Unemployment

NY Post’s latest snortastic front page

2013_12 10 NY POST - Flirting with Dane-ger!

Comment at Twitchy: I’d make sure to station Secret Service by the bed before sleeping tonight, if I was him.

    Reply to comment: You spelled “by the couch” wrong. 🙂

Source:

http://twitchy.com/2013/12/11/haha-how-did-headline-crush-ny-post-blast-president-funeral-selfie-flotus-pic/

3 Comments

Filed under Barack Obama, Michelle Obama