Um, not well. Near the beginning of the conflict that has played out, about two days ago, one of the principal feminists behind the storm, Dr. Janet Stemwedel, a Philosophy professor in San Francisco, wrote up a brief bit of propaganda on “Storify” for “science guys” to help them understand what was going on and what was at stake. If women like Dr. Stemwedel represent most women, as she claims with some authority, then you would expect her Storify blurb, which has been prominently featured on the very active #shirtstorm and #shirtgate hashtag threads for two days, to have about a 50% favorability rating in terms of “likes” accumulated; perhaps more if men support her thesis, as well. Let’s see how it’s doing.

At the time of this writing, 4 of the over 6000 viewers “liked” her little visual presentation about how academic interpretations of “women’s experiences” should drive policy on just about everything. By my calculation, that’s a percentage of… oh dear… 0.06%. That’s essentially zero. More than the likely number of accidental clicks. In my limited blogging experience, I have never seen a comment or an opinion by any troll who is intentionally trying to upset people and who is viewed by 6000 people get fewer than dozens of “likes.” Nobody knows why, but even the vilest internet trolls get more likes than this. This message is profoundly unpopular. If you want to know why, you can go to her Twitter feed here and see if you can figure out why she is still employed in academia and allowed to claim that she represents women everywhere.

Category Archives: Feminism
How are the #ShirtStorm Feminists Doing in their Twitter Crusade?
Filed under Feminism
ESA Comet Lander Fails to Anchor, Perched on Cliff, But the REAL Story Turns Out to be Criminal Sexism Among ESA Rocket Scientists

First appeared at the Blog of Monte Cristo.
The world’s first spacecraft to land on a comet has apparently become merely the first craft to ‘bounce’ off of a comet and settle into a precarious perch on a dark comet cliff where it’s batteries may not be able to recharge enough to keep it alive for more than a few days. The European Space Agency’s Rosetta mission has succeeded in depositing it’s lander, called Philae, on the surface of comet 67P/Churyumox-Gerasimenko Wednesday. The world awaits word on whether this spectacular accomplishment will yield precious data about the comet in coming days. It may be that very little can be saved after the craft failed to anchor to the comet as planned.
But that has not kept the international community from finding something else gossip-worthy about the mission. It seems that the wild shirt worn by a British member of the ESA operations team during the landing and a press interview has caused feminists everywhere to start shrieking uncontrollably. I’m not sure why. See one of the more insanity-inducing tweets here. Make sure you read the smug comments. They’re a scream.

MUST view video – six minutes
Comments Off on MUST view video – six minutes
Filed under Feminism, Matt Walsh
#Don’tNeedFeminism
Source:
http://www.ijreview.com/2014/07/156463-15-women-share-reasons-dont-need-empowered-feminist-movement/
Comments Off on #Don’tNeedFeminism
Filed under Feminism
Holly Hobby Lobby
When Holly Fisher vented on Twitter about how she lost her baby’s pediatric cardiologist thanks to Obamacare, the Always-Tolerant, Ever-Caring “It’s For The Children” Leftists declared her a hate target.
If you find this confusing, please remember that Lefties consider only other Lefties to be REAL in any way. In their teensy weensy little minds, Conservative women are not Real Women, so making rape and death threats against them doesn’t count as making War On Women.
One of them said as much to Holly: “Conservatives aren’t human to me. They’re subhuman scum with no hearts or souls.“
Earlier this week, Holly had some fun, tweeting a photo of herself wearing a Pro-Life T-shirt and enjoying a drink from Chick-fil-A while standing in the parking lot of a Hobby Lobby. It got 5 MILLION likes in just one day. Holly also got tweeted a lot. Kudos and thumbs up from the “subhuman scum” and the usual round of hate-filled verbal sewage from the tolerance police.
Source:
http://twitchy.com/2014/07/03/holly-fisher-makes-liberal-heads-explode-with-hat-trick-photo-pic/
Filed under Feminism, Hobby Lobby, Life Issues
Hysterical GOP candidate response to Dumbocrat attack
The following is from an article at Catholic Vote:
Democrat Rep. Gary Peters of suburban Detroit is normally a very strong campaigner. But he’s having a tougher time than expected as he tries to win the Senate seat of retiring Democrat Carl Levin.
To help him sagging poll numbers, Peters thought he would bring back the “war on women” campaign tactic that proved very successful for Democrats in 2012.
Surely you remember the faux “war or women.” This is where feminists and Democratic candidates went before tv cameras and aired commercials asserting that if Republicans like Mitt Romney won women would somehow be unable to purchase contraception anymore.
What?!?
The Pill has been readily available at every corner drug store for over 50 years. Contraception has even been subsidized by state and federal governments for decades.
No political candidate has suggested making the Pill illegal.
We expect politicians to lie, but the “war on women” attack has got to be the most disingenuous political attack of the last 50 years.
If you don’t favor forcing businesses to offer contraception as a free benefit to employees, then somehow you are “anti-woman” and you want to make contraception illegal.
It’s a total lie. But it worked in 2012. So Gary Peters went for this attack and called his opponent “anti-woman.”
The only problem? Gary Peters’ opponent is a woman.
And Terri Lynn Land refused to let this garbage attack go unanswered. She pounced on Peters’ nonsense talk with a very clever ad of her own.
Terri Lynn Land’s reply to Gary Peters’ attack < FUNNY!
Source:
H/t Pistol Pete
This Democrat called his opponent anti-woman. You have to watch the response.
Comments Off on Hysterical GOP candidate response to Dumbocrat attack
Filed under Democrats, Elections, Feminism, Republicans
Jan Schakowsky: Foot Soldier in the Democrat War on Women
Dana Loesch tweets in response to Schakowsky’s lie:
- @janschakowsky How is it empowering to lie to us? Offensive to assume females are that stupid.
- @janschakowsky Are you misleading women because you don’t know the law? Or is this a malicious lie? Which?
- It represents women horribly for @janschakowsky to exploit them with propaganda. Women deserve better.
- “Oh no! March 31 is coming and we are millions short of our goal! Better scare us up some wimmins to enroll!”
- “It’s Women’s History Month. No better way to honor women than by assuming they’re all idiots and will believe our healthcare lies.”
- “It’s Women’s History Month. Let’s celebrate women’s independence from men by making them pay for things we can buy ourselves.”
The indisputable Pro-Choice argument
In his recent blog “I am afraid of this indisputable pro-choice argument”, Matt Walsh responds to an email that claims to blow his Pro-Life position out of the water.
Rachel emailed to him, “If you had the guts or the brains you’d try to respond to the most important abortion rights argument … bodily autonomy or bodily integrity. This means that we have the final jurisdiction over our own bodies. … A fetus must survive on a woman’s body so the woman has a right to withdrawal her consent and her body at any time. This is the pro-choice argument that no anti-choice fanatic … especially one as stubborn and simpleminded as you … could ever possibly dispute.”
Matt responds with ten points that are so logical and clear, I must only refer you to the original. To whet your appetite, here is a quick sample of his snarky wit and his ten talking points:
Dear Rachel,
You’re right. You win. I have no response. I can’t think of any reason why you’re wrong about any of the points you raised.
Well, I can’t think of any reason — except for, like, ten reasons.
- Relationships are relevant.
- Situations are relevant.
- Your own argument defeats itself.
- Natural order matters.
- Withdrawing life support is nothing like actively killing a healthy unborn child.
- You must allow pregnant women to do whatever they please, no matter how it may harm her unborn child.
- You must allow abortion at every stage of development.
- You must allow people to abandon or murder any child that makes unpleasant demands on them.
- You must allow a range of other offensive and dangerous behaviors, like men who want to masturbate in front of chilren at a playground.
- We are not autonomous beings. We live in a complex society that requires us to use our bodies in many ways. If you concede that we ought to be expected or even required to do certain things, then you are placing limits on our bodily autonomy.
If you place limits on our bodily autonomy, then you are admitting that limits can be placed on our bodily autonomy. Personally, I think that abortion goes well beyond the limits on bodily autonomy, for all of the reasons I’ve previously stipulated.
Read the rest @
http://themattwalshblog.com/2014/03/04/i-am-afraid-of-this-indisputable-pro-choice-argument/
H/t Angelaisms
Filed under Abortion, Feminism, Life Issues, Matt Walsh




















