Category Archives: Media Bias

Obama’s not-so-secret ‘kill list’

Obama’s kill list revealed [2:40]

Obama has a lot of blood on his hands.

Krauthammer: Obama Denounced Enhanced Interrogation; Now He’s Judge, Jury And Executioner [3:23]

Video embedded @ http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2012/05/29/krauthammer_obama_denounced_enhanced_interrogation_but_now_hes_judge_jury_and_executioner.html

I was surprised in the Krauthammer video that the ever-effusive Obama-phile Juan Williams freely admitted Obama is a flaming hypocrite on this issue!

Of course, he then praised Obama’s tough leadership. Par for the course, right? “Do whatever it takes to get elected” is Commandment One in the Democrat play book.

The New York Times broke the ‘kill list’ story which reveals that Our Fearless Leader, Barack “I got bin Laden” Obama, has been taking a very hands on, tough guy approach to the whole “keeping America safe” thing.

In fact, Barack is personally overseeing the shadow war with Al Qaeda and making those Big Tough Decisions about who of the world’s most wanted terrorists should be assassinated. Don’t you feel safer now? Don’t you just really want to vote him into a second term?

Tough Guy Obama prefers ordering “kill” over “capture” … maybe because dead terrorists don’t cause messy political problems by hiring whiney liberal lawyers from their cells at Gitmo.

Obama did, after all, rant at length about how eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeevil Bush was for Torturing Detainees At Gitmo (never mind Nancy Pelosi herself was one of the CONGRESSIONAL leaders who specifically approved all 3 waterboardings).

Obama also swore left, right and center that He Would Close Gitmo No Matter What … except he didn’t. But that was 2008, when he was the Messiah of Hope, Change and Moral Superiority.

Never mind that dead terrorists ALSO don’t give us any intel about who their buddies are or what evil plots they might be hatching. Obama’s got to run a campaign and his first term record sucks. What else can he run on besides, “I killed bin Laden”?

I agree with The Kraut that this story was deliberately leaked to take Obama’s Tough on Terror meme to a new level … plus to get the spotlight back on HIM and off those goofball SEALS who went and complained they didn’t like being used in his campaign ads.

And it’s the Times for crying out loud. Of course it says that Teh Won is only Tough in a GOOD way …. NOT like that bloodthirsty bastard, the Eeeevil Cowboy Bushitler.

Never mind that Teh Won — the President Formerly Known as a Lawyer who once insisted that military detainees be Mirandized —  has now gone and ordered the assassination-by-drone (minus trial by jury) of an American citizen (a decision he told colleagues was “an easy one”). Civil rights violations? Nothing to see here. Keep on moving.

The Grey Lady reassures us that Barack is nothing like the Evil George Bush! He totally “rejected the Bush administration’s false choice between our safety and our ideals” by insisting the CIA be way more careful about Avoiding Civilian Casualties!

Never mind that they are apparently avoiding “civilian” casualties by more or less counting everybody inside the strike zone as a combatant, which reminds me of what Clinton did to improve his unemployment numbers by creating the “discouraged workers” category into which he could shovel the long-term unemployed.

I’m kinda wondering something here. Who exactly is supposed to be impressed by this thing that wasn’t already in the tank for Obama anyway. Anyone?

————————

Source:

Obama’s ‘secret kill list’ shows president is final word on terrorist killing missions By Dylan Stableford – May 29, 2012

http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/obama-secret-kill-list-shows-president-final-word-151204051.html

4 Comments

Filed under Al Qaeda, Barack Obama, Charles Krauthammer, George W. Bush, Guantanamo, Juan Williams, Media Bias, Terrorism

The Journalistic Establishment’s latest violation of public trust

Chrissy’s Site Bites @ http://news.webshots.com/photo/2286923270056011884aucbok

Click on graphic to embiggen.

After you sign the petition below (it’s free), please forward this to all of your patriotic friends and family, share it on your social networks, and remind people that freedom of religion was the first right guaranteed to us in our Constitution.

Petition @ http://www.mrcaction.org/action/586

“As a citizen and a patriot, I demand an end to the media’s obvious misleading of the public regarding what this mandate means for religious freedom in our country. I also call upon the media to fully report on the massive backlash this mandate has brought about.”

If you like this, you might also enjoy @ https://polination.wordpress.com/2012/05/16/newsweeks-gaylo-cover/

5 Comments

Filed under Barack Obama, Catholic Church, Constitution, First Amendment, Media Bias, Obamacare, Religious Liberty

Losing the War on Women

According to Mike Flynn at Breitbart, WaPo is using its latest poll to blat that Obama is beating Romney by 2 points, 49-47.

But the poll sample included only 22% Republicans. Gallup shows 28% of Americans currently self-identify as Republican.

And, as Flynn notes, if only 22% of actual voters next November are Republicans,

“it would be about the lowest turnout for the GOP in modern history. In 2010, 35% of voters were Republican. In 2008, the year Obama swept into the White House, 32% of voters were Republican. Even in 2006, the year Democrats took control of Congress, 36% of voters were Republican.”

Still , according to analysts, WaPo’s bias is consistent, which means changes within WaPo polls are actually meaningful.

Check out what happened to Obama’s favorability among women over the time period in which the White House and its media kennels ranted that Republicans just want women to be Stepford Wives:

Obama lost 6 points to Romney among women registered to vote.

Obama lost 21 points to Romney among married women!

Poll info sources:
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/05/22/Poll-Proves-Obama-Lost-War-On-Women
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/05/22/wapo-abc-poll-assumes-lowest-gop-turnout-in-decades-to-boost-obama
http://www.gallup.com/poll/15370/Party-Affiliation.aspx

1 Comment

Filed under Barack Obama, Democrats, Media Bias, Mitt Romney, Polls, Republicans

Even skewing the sample isn’t helping

I’ve come to expect a poll by CBS News/New York Times to be left-biased. The latest one did not disappoint. With only 615 participants, they claim just 4 points in Margin of Error. NOT. And they decided to WEIGHT this one, because … oh heavenly days … the numbers of Republicans, Independents and Democrats actually MATCHED the national averages reported by Gallup! Can’t have that, now can we?

Republicans: Actual polled 28%. Gallup says that’s bang on. The pollsters weighted GOP responses down to 25%.
Independents: Actual polled 32%. Gallup reports 33%. The pollsters weighted Indie responses up to 34%.
Democrats: Actual polled 39%. Gallup reports 38%. The pollsters upped the weight of their answers to 41%.

Even so … they had nothing good to report, though they did their best to sugar coat it with adjectives. This is from the report:

The race for president remains close, but Republican Mitt Romney now has a three-point lead over President Obama, despite positive movement on the economy.

32% say the economy is in good shape – the highest percentage since January 2008 – but most (67%) still say it’s bad. 36% say the economy is improving.

While most voters say the President’s support of same-sex marriage will not impact their vote, 25% say they are less likely to vote for him because of it.

Most Americans favor some type of legal recognition of same-sex relationships, including 38% who support marriage. When asked directly whether same-sex marriage should be legal or not, 42% say it should be, but 51% say it should not.

There has also been a shift in female support away from Obama and toward Romney, suggesting the “Republicans are Waging War on Women” campaign is backfiring. Two months ago, the same pollsters got 49% Obama v 43% Romney among women. Now it’s 44% Obama v 46% Romney.

In other news the Left doesn’t want you to hear, yet another study shows that abortion increases a woman’s risk of developing breast cancer. The higher the number of abortions the higher the risk.

Sources:

“War on Women” Rhetoric Backfires, Romney Leads With Women
By Steven Ertelt | Washington, DC | LifeNews.com | 5/15/12 10:38 AM

“War on Women” Rhetoric Backfires, Romney Leads With Women

CBS News/New York Times Poll May 11-13, 2012 among 615 adults nationwide
http://www.cbsnews.com/htdocs/pdf/CBSNYTPoll_051412.pdf?tag=contentMain;contentBody

Gallup Party Affiliation Polls
http://www.gallup.com/poll/15370/Party-Affiliation.aspx

Study: Repeat Abortions Greatly Raise Breast Cancer Risk
By Steven Ertelt | Washington, DC | LifeNews.com | 5/15/12 12:51 PM

Study: Repeat Abortions Greatly Raise Breast Cancer Risk

Comments Off on Even skewing the sample isn’t helping

Filed under Media Bias, Polls

Is CNN biased? You betcha!

Compare these two videos.

Same reporter.

Same city.

Two protests just one day apart.

April 15, 2009: Showdown Between CNN Reporter & Chicago Tea Party Guests [3:14]

April 16, 2009: CNN’s Susan Roesgen Different Tone When It’s A Left Wing Protest [1:40]

Comments Off on Is CNN biased? You betcha!

Filed under Barack Obama, Media Bias, Taxes, Tea Party

Newsweek’s Gaylo Cover

Click on graphics to embiggen.

Is it my imagination, or are the assaults on Judaeo-Christian faith actually getting more blatant, more frequent, and more obnoxious?

4 Comments

Filed under Barack Obama, Media Bias, Mitt Romney

The laughs just keep coming!

OMG! Ann Romney might have tried to use an expired coupon once upon a time! Call the Media!

Oh wait. Somebody already did.

Posted today in comments @ PoliNation: “I heard a former grocery checker on the radio say that Mrs. Romney once tried to use an expired coupon. Horrors. How could we have such a dishonest first lady!”

ARE THEY KIDDING?! ROFLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL

(If Ann only got one coupon wrong, she’s way ahead of me. The expiry dates on the darn things are so small, you need a magnifying glass to read them.)

The comment continued: “Not like the the paragon of virtue now in the White House. You know, the one who fabricated the story about why she no longer has a law license.”

Oh, yeah. THAT old story … one of the many the media ignored in favor of things like criticizing Sarah Palin for NOT staying home with her five kids.

Odd how THAT tune has changed … now Ann Romney is a useless blight on society because she DID stay home with her five kids.

At least Ann actually raised her five boys.

Michelle Obama was sure she would need more help with her two girls than her White House staff of 60+ could provide, so her Mommy moved in to the First Mansion too.

For those of you who are late to the party, the media portrayed Michelle as a “distinguished attorney” who chose to forgo the big bucks in corporate law so she could “have a career motivated by passion and not just money.”

Blah blah blah. Outside the lapdog media’s kennels, her “career” doesn’t look so hot.

1988: Michelle Robinson was graduated from Harvard Law School and walked right into a job as an associate lawyer at the prestigious Chicago corporate law firm of Sidley & Austin. Typically, incoming law grads are given the summer to prepare for the bar.

Michelle Robinson, Harvard Law School grad, took IL bar for the first time in 1988 and flunked.

97% of Harvard Law School (ranked 3rd in nation) graduates who took the NYS bar for the first time in 2007 passed.

89% of Loyola University Chicago School of Law (ranked 67th in nation) graduates who took the IL bar for the first time in 2010 passed.

1989: Michelle passed the exam second time around and was admitted to the Illinois bar.

1991: She left Sidley & Austin. In June of 2008, she told the New York Times it was because she had been unfulfilled by her law career and “wanted to have a career motivated by passion and not just money.” This is what a peer of hers at Sidley had to say:

Michele’s office was on my floor at the firm and I would walk by it everyday. She was rarely in the office, had very limited work papers in her office, yet apparently was drawing an associate salary while not practicing law, and billing huge hours as is ordinary for an associate. My fellow associates and I worked to 10 p.m. customarily and many times to 2 to 3 a.m., every weekend, meeting the crushing work loads. But Michele never had to do that, which understandably caused a lot of resentment amongst fellow associates. I have no first hand knowledge since it would be a private and confidential arrangement, but the associate scuttlebutt drawn from partner “leaks” was that she was drawing a firm salary while working full time for City Hall doing political fund raising and “special projects” work for the Daley Machine. The word was that this arrangement benefited the firm because many times their real estate clients had city zoning and other legal issues that required city approvals or resolution, so the firm needed to be viewed as on the city hall team and accede to their wishes. So from the very start of her career my opinion is that Michelle was the beneficiary of the nefarious city hall back scratching schemes. As demonstrated by The Obama File, she seems to have benefitted from these “arrangements” her entire professional career. I have my doubts that she did much at the University of Chicago to justify such an enormous salary and have never heard tell of any significant projects she was handling, let alone any accomplishments or major successes in the healthcare field.

Michele at one point did leave officially to work for the Daley Administration, but was already well engaged in political activities during the day and regularly absent from the firm for a lengthy period of time before she left. I can’t recall the precise timelines but I would estimate that she was listed as an associate at the firm but not carrying a regular work load for well over one year, maybe even two years before she “left” for the City Hall payroll.

On a personal note, Michele was simply the most angry, arrogant and caustic young person I have ever met in my life. She simply would not engage with her fellow associates and apparently viewed herself as superior to them. I personally observed that she would only engage with partners, most notably senior partners. Never a friendly smile or good morning for staff or fellow associates as she walked past them day after day after day. I remember one particular instance where a group of associates and I were chatting at a firm cocktail party and I noted how no one seemed to know Michele but were constantly gossiping about her. The gang just commented about how arrogant and unfriendly she was and never around. I commented that maybe she was just uncomfortable as a Southside girl being around all of these elitist, snobby white folks at a silk stocking firm. So I walked over to her when she was getting hors d’oeuvres and introduced myself as a friendly overture. She gave me a dirty look, literally threw her head back and turned her back on me and walked back over the a group of senior partners gathered around Eden Martin! As if you say how dare you approach me you filthy little underling. I went back to my group of associates friends feeling embarrassed and they just chuckled and said “told ya’.” So, Michele was not the sweet or kind person the media would like us to believe. She was an elitist and only was interested in those who could advance her personal interest, not ordinary folks. To this day, that episode was the rudest I have ever been treated by anyone, and there are lot of rude lawyers out there.

[But OMG, fifty years ago, Mitt Romney might have said something mean to some kid in his high school! Get a camera crew!]

1991 to 1993: Michelle worked as an assistant for Valerie Jarrett, then-deputy chief of staff for Chicago Mayor Richard Daley.

1993: Just four years after her admission to the Illinois bar, her right to practice was rescinded by court order.

Chrissy’s Site Bites @ http://news.webshots.com/photo/2078824670056011884bhvseI

Click on graphic to embiggen.

Note: The ARDC is NOT the Illinois Bar where one can voluntarily become an inactive attorney by simply not paying the renewal fee or keeping up with required in-service coursework. The ARDC is the agency of the Supreme Court of Illinois which registers attorneys and investigates complaints of illegal, unethical or dishonest conduct filed against attorneys holding a license to practice law in Illinois.

Upon investigation, the Supreme Court of Illinois will ultimately decide if a lawyer should be censured (publicly rebuked), suspended (having the law license to practice either taken away for a certain period of time or placed on a probationary period) or disbarred (having the law license taken away indefinitely). Michelle Obama was disbarred.

1993: At the same time she was running from her dirty secret, Michelle also left the mayor’s office. Connected? Ya think?! So what does a not-terribly-bright, pampered, bitter, black Chicago politico’s daughter do when she manages to screw up that badly? She sticks her face in the public trough and becomes a community organizer, or course.

Michelle launched the Chicago office of Public Allies, a taxpayer-funded organization that paid young people to receive training in Left-wing politics and activism, then helped place them in positions with nonprofit groups and government agencies.

  • Michelle’s husband, Barack Obama, was a member of the group’s founding advisory board.
  • President Clinton declared Public Allies a model for national service.
  • First Lady Hilary Clinton hosted a Rose Garden reception for the group.

Does the media care? Nah.

They remind me of The Cat in the Hat by Dr. Seuss: “Poor Dick and Sally. It’s cold and wet and they’re stuck in the house with nothing to do . . . until a giant cat in a hat shows up, transforming the dull day into a madcap adventure and almost wrecking the place in the process!”

Sources:

http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2008/12/wtf-michelle-ob.html

https://www.iardc.org/lawyersearch.asp

What happened to Michelle Obama’s law license?

http://www.ilrg.com/rankings/law/index.php/1/desc/Bar

http://www.halfsigma.com/2008/02/michelle-obama.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loyola_University_Chicago_School_of_Law

http://www.theobamafile.com/_family/PeerReview.htm

http://www.theobamafile.com/_family/PeerReview.htm

H/t GP

4 Comments

Filed under Ann Romney, Barack Obama, Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, Media Bias, Michelle Obama, Mitt Romney, Valerie Jarrett

Obama’s anemic kick off at OSU

True, it was a lovely Saturday in May, lots of reason for kids to be cramming for finals or outside enjoying the weather. But this was the President of the United States who was wildly popular with young voters in 2008. And the Obama campaign boasted an expected overflow crowd. They didn’t get one, but this embarrassment was expertly cover up by most of the big media outfits. They’re good at that, having had plenty of experience in covering up for Teh Won over the last four years.


Chrissy’s Site Bites @ http://news.webshots.com/photo/2526152990056011884gHjkPf
Click on graphic to embiggen.
If you like this, you might also enjoy @ https://polination.wordpress.com/2012/05/05/2012-bumper-stickers/

Sources:
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/obama_administration/daily_presidential_tracking_poll
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2012/05/obama_kicks_off_his_campaign_to_half_empty_arena.html
https://twitter.com/#!/RyanGOP/status/198825335670833152

7 Comments

Filed under Barack Obama, Elections, Media Bias, Mitt Romney

Democrat Government Approval Hits New Low

Today, just one in three Americans has a favorable view of the federal government. This is the lowest level in 15 years. Republicans held the majority control of the federal government from 1997 through 2006.

Democrats have had majority control from 2007 through today. They said they were prepared to govern. They said they would do a much better job than the Republicans had. They lied.

Chrissy’s Site Bites @ http://news.webshots.com/photo/2898313880056011884gbackW

Click on graphic to embiggen.

2 Comments

Filed under Democrats, Media Bias, Republicans

Who do you prefer as First Lady?

Ann Romney vs Michelle Obama [:27]

Hilary Rosen’s attack on Ann Romney sparked an uproar that led to her apologizing and Obama and the White House distancing themselves from her remarks.

But White House visitor logs show that she has visited the White House at least 35 times and had several direct meetings with President Obama and with several of his senior advisers (Valerie Jarrett, David Axelrod, Jim Messina).

I believe Rosen’s attack expressed the Left’s genuine contempt for any human being who checked R when they registered to vote and that all their subsequent back-peddling is due exclusively to the fact that the attack hurt them politically.

We’ve seen this kind of thing over and over. IMHO, they’re saying what they really believe and only back-peddle when it explodes in their faces. Remember these gems?

Joe Biden’s reference to Obama as Clean & Articulate [4:11]

Barack Obama’s reference to bitter, gun and Bible clinging bigots [:25]

And they’re not all rethinking the decision to sneer at Stay At Home Moms.

Democrat activist says Rosen had every right to attack Romney  [1:51]

I don’t know who the blonde commentator on the FOX clip is, but I think she is absolutely dead on about the Left seeing people only as voting blocs. Michelle Malkin summarizes nicely:

What’s changed in 2012 is the Internet revenge of thousands of conservative female activists who have played a larger role than ever in controlling political narratives. These include tea party leaders such as Breitbart.com editor Dana Loesch, national grassroots groups such as Smart Girl Politics, the proliferation of conservative female bloggers and podcasters, and the critical mass of stay-at-home moms, work-at-home moms and young conservative women flocking to Twitter.

As we’ve documented at my new Twitter curation/aggregation site, Twitchy.com, GOP moms, grandmothers and daughters have besieged White House social media efforts to paint conservatives as anti-women. They’ve torn apart hypocritical White House rhetoric about equal pay from an administration that has failed to practice what it preaches.

And as Ann Romney is now experiencing on Twitter, the women of the right are fighting their way through a hostile cesspool of misogyny that has been SOP for the feminist left.

Rosen and her media defenders dismissed “faux outrage” about her attack. But the real moms of the GOP have launched their own Occupy movement in the social media space once dominated by Obama’s army. And they’re winning.

http://townhall.com/columnists/michellemalkin/2012/04/13/real_moms_of_the_gop_vs_white_house_sop/page/full/

9 Comments

Filed under Ann Romney, Barack Obama, Media Bias, Michelle Malkin, Michelle Obama