Category Archives: Race Relations

Class vs. Crass

RNC 2012: Church Members Share Moving Tale of Son’s Tragic Death [5:30] < KLEENEX ALERT

August 30, 2012: Pat and Ted Oparowski detail Mitt Romney’s kindness toward their terminally-ill son.

Chrissy’s Site Bites @ http://news.webshots.com/photo/2177732740056011884nawfpj

Click on graphic to embiggen.

If you like this, you might also want to read @ https://polination.wordpress.com/2012/08/22/a-heartbeat-away/

H/t Pistol Pete

1 Comment

Filed under Barack Obama, Mitt Romney, Race Relations

Dog-whistle politics

Click on graphics to embiggen.

Biden Says Republicans Will Put People Back In Chains [:22]

Chrissy’s Site Bites @ http://news.webshots.com/photo/2415033990056011884OMTlYZ

Romney was right to say that Biden had made an outrageous remark that caused the Obama White House to sink a little bit lower and that Obama’s people should take their campaign of division and anger and hate back to Chicago.

Joe Biden and his cronies could do with a history lesson. The Republican Party was founded for the express purpose of ending slavery.

Chrissy’s Site Bites @ http://news.webshots.com/photo/2852045420056011884dGGDdV

The Democratic Party ran on a White Supremacy plank for decades before the civil rights legislation sponsored and passed by Republicans allowed the Black vote to grow enough clout that self-serving Democrats like Lyndon Johnson were forced to at least pretend in public that they weren’t bigots.

President Lyndon Johnson using the “N” word [:45]

If you like this, you might also enjoy https://polination.wordpress.com/2012/08/02/show-me-the-money/

1 Comment

Filed under Democrats, Joe Biden, Mitt Romney, Race Relations, Republicans

Liberal Logic 101

Click on graphics to embiggen.

Chrissy’s Site Bites @ http://news.webshots.com/photo/2133083680056011884nYnQBu

Chrissy’s Site Bites @ http://news.webshots.com/photo/2486354380056011884DoxakS

Chrissy’s Site Bites @ http://news.webshots.com/photo/2860770990056011884YyWTcx

I did not make these. There are lots more @ http://liberallogic101.com/

Comments Off on Liberal Logic 101

Filed under Barack Obama, Climate, Darwinism, Obamacare, Race Relations

Voter ID isn’t racism

American liberals who oppose voter ID regulations WANT our system to remain open to fraud. There is no other explanation.

Chrissy’s Site Bites @ http://news.webshots.com/photo/2487169900056011884AwMARs

Click on graphic to embiggen.

If you like this, you might also enjoy @ https://polination.wordpress.com/2012/01/14/majority-support-voter-id-laws/

H/t to Mindful Webworker for source @ http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/07/14/voter-id-mexicos-system-better-than-americas

4 Comments

Filed under Elections, Race Relations, Vote Fraud, Voter ID

Vote Him Out!

“GET OUT” by Ryan Bomberger/SoOutLoud.com [1:53]

Ryan Bomberger, creator of this catchy animated music video, is a black pro-life advocate, an avid writer and conservative who upholds famed orator Frederick Douglass (a Republican) as a profound source of inspiration.

“I’m as black as Obama, and I’m tired of any legitimate criticism of the President’s policy reduced to ludicrous charges of racism,” he said. “Obama and the Democrat party have been recklessly defying our Constitution with a whole lot of hope and change that most Americans do not want.”

“It’s our duty to hold our government accountable. Both parties are guilty of diminishing the Constitution with thousands of pieces of legislation that only put layers of separation between Americans and our guaranteed Constitutional liberties,” Bomberger said.

“The Democrats — the party of slavery, Jim Crow laws, anti-women’s suffrage movement, the KKK, abortion, and generational welfare – is also the party of reconstruction as it dangerously dismantles the Constitution. This video just says out loud what many others are feeling.”

See more at http://www.SoOutLoud.com

Source @ http://www.lifenews.com/2012/07/10/new-pro-life-music-video-tells-obama-to-get-out/

Comments Off on Vote Him Out!

Filed under Barack Obama, Constitution, Democrats, Race Relations

Some good news for our side

I just finished scoping out four opinion polls about the HHS mandate that date from February, March, May and June of this year. For those who want it, the data and URLs are provided below. But first, here are my thoughts.

A May poll of Adult Americans showed a very high degree of passion and support for freedom of religion above all else. It’s very rare to get a ZERO in the Meh crowd. [Meh = Don’t Know, No Opinion, It Depends.] But that’s what this poll found when they asked,

“Should freedom of religion be protected, even if it conflicts with other laws?”

26% No vs. 74% Yes vs. 0% Meh.

Clearly, as a nation, we really care about religious freedom. I have seen this 1:3 split in other polls on hot issues, including in another question from that same May poll.

“Is it morally wrong to force health care workers and doctors to provide abortion when they object for religious reasons?”

27% No vs. 72% Yes vs. 1% Meh.

I believe the 1:3 reflects the Hard-Left vs. Center-Right divide in America today. The Democrat Media Complex blats about how they are the majority and we are the extremist fringey tinfoil hatters. But the real truth is the opposite.

This is something to keep in mind when talking to those critical Undecided voters. The Hard-Leftists are already committed to the Democrats, so the likelihood that an Undecided is fundamentally Center-Right on most issues is very, very high. Find their hot buttons and focus on how Obama Democrats have violated those core values.

I saw another phenomenon in the May poll that I’ve seen before. Despite 74% of these same people saying they supported freedom of religion above all else, when the questions got specific about birth control, abortion, etc., support for the primacy of religious freedom dropped to between 51% and 58%.

But it shouldn’t have mattered whether the question was “Does religious freedom trump everything?” or “Does religious freedom trump this, that or the other thing?” Everything should mean everything, right? Except apparently it didn’t for about one-third of the people who said it did.

I see the same disconnect in presidential approval polls. When the question is “Do you approve of the job Obama is doing?”, the numbers are always higher than they are for subordinate issues, like “Do you approve of the job Obama is doing on the economy?” or “the war in Afghanistan?” etc.

The best explanation I can come up with is that people weenie out on reporting their real opinions when there is a hot button issue in the question. The Democrat Media Complex hounds us with certain messages about what it means to be a “good” person. Like, “If you don’t like Barack Obama, you’re a dirty RAAAAACIST!!!” And “If you don’t support birth control, you HATE WOMEN!!!” So the poll questions that include a culturally-charged anxiety trigger get a less honest answer than one that homes in on a core value.

It could be the other way around. I.e., that these people are all for religious freedom as long as it doesn’t interfere with them getting free stuff. I hope not. Freedom of religion is the reason many of us (or our ancestors) left everything familiar to come here. I think we’re more attached to it than the Left realizes.

If I’m right, then the higher number in the straight-up “religious freedom is primary” question is the accurate number while the lower numbers that are attached to culturally-charged anxiety triggers are less accurate. I guess we’ll find out in November when voters are not answering a live pollster … “What will she think of me?!” … but casting secret ballots that will help decide the fate of the nation.

The March poll provides support for my thesis. It asked twice about forcing health insurance plans to provide free birth control, once for just anybody and then again for groups that have moral or religious objections to birth control. Where the question was purely secular, opposition to mandatory free birth control was 51%. But when they mentioned religious or moral objections in the question, opposition increased by 6 points. And notice in the June poll that the HHS mandate issue ALONE has resulted in a 13% to 16% shift toward opposition to Obama!

I think the lesson for us is clear.

When we’re talking with those critical Undecideds who will swing this close race for or against us, we should couch the discussions in terms of CORE values.

“It’s not about birth control. It’s about keeping the government from forcing people to violate their religious beliefs.”

“This is not about race. We elected a black man to our highest office. We’ve proven we aren’t a racist nation anymore. Now we need to ask if he has fixed the economy and gotten people back to work like he said he would.”

One final point … I’m interested in how well our messaging is getting past the alphabet media blockade, so I snooped through the data to see if I could see any signs that there’s been a shift in opinion over the five months these polls tracked. I think there has been and it’s to our side.

Three polls asked variations on the generic question: Should health insurance plans be required to provide free birth control? The February poll showed 43% of Likely Voters opposed, but the March and May polls both showed 51% of Adult Americans opposed. Since Likely Voters generally poll more Center-Right than Adult Americans, the actual shift toward support for religious freedom may have been even higher than 8%. And it’s held up against the Left’s onslaughts.

Thank God for the First Amendment, talk radio, the internet and our church pulpits!

A Survey of recent opinion polls re: The HHS Mandate

February 2012 (Likely Voters)

Should health insurance companies be required by law to provide free …

… Contraception: 43% No.

… Morning after pills: 50% No.

March 2012 (Adult Americans)

Should health insurance plans for all employees have to cover the full cost of birth control for female employees or should employers be able to opt out for moral or religious reasons?

Plans offered by secular institutions: 40% Must cover vs. 51% Opt out vs. 9% Meh.

Plans offered by religious institutions: 36% Must cover vs. 57% Opt out vs. 7% Meh.

CtH: The second “Opt out” is 6% higher and the Meh is 2% lower. Another sign that we have a special place in our hearts for protecting religious freedom.

May 2012 (Adult Americans)

Should freedom of religion be protected, even if it conflicts with other laws?

Adults: 74% Yes vs. 26% No vs. 0% Meh.

Is it morally wrong to force health care workers and doctors to provide abortion when they object for religious reasons?

Adults: 72% Yes vs. 27% No vs. 1% Meh.

Should individual health care providers and organizations providing health insurance policies be allowed to opt out of providing …

Abortion: 58% Yes vs. 38% No vs. 4% Meh

Birth control pills: 51% Yes vs. 46% No vs. 3% Meh

Abortion-inducing drugs: 51% Yes vs. 44% No vs. 5% Meh

Medication to speed the death of a terminally ill patient: 55% Yes vs. 41% No vs. 4% Meh

In vitro fertilization treatments that could result in the death of an embryo: 52% Yes vs. 41% No vs. 7% Meh

Do you believe …

… Contraception is morally acceptable? 88% Yes.

… Abortion is wrong in an of itself? 58% Yes.

June 2012 (Registered Voters)

Is providing free birth control worthy of federal concern?

Catholics: 57% No vs. 37% Yes.

Women: 44% No vs. 51% Yes.

Does the federal government have the right to force morally objectionable coverage on religious institutions?

Women: 57% No.

Should birth control be treated like any other drug, without mandatory coverage?

Catholics: 67% Yes. Women 63% Yes.

Will the HHS mandate make you less likely to vote for Obama, more likely to vote for Obama, or have no impact on your vote?

Religiously active white females: 38% Less Likely vs. 12% More Likely. (38 – 12 = 16 away from Obama)

Catholics: 29% Less Likely vs. 13% More Likely. (29 – 13 = 16 away from Obama)

Independents: 28% Less Likely vs. 15% More Likely. (28 – 15 = 13 away from Obama)

Sources

February poll of Likely Voters by Rasmussen reported @

http://www.lifenews.com/2012/02/22/poll-americans-oppose-obama-birth-control-coverage-mandate/

March poll of Adult Americans by New York Times/CBS News reported @

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2012/03/13/us/politics/president-obamas-approval-rating-drops.html?ref=politics

May poll of Adult Americans by Marist College commissioned by the Knights of Columbus reported @

http://www.lifenews.com/2012/05/22/poll-majority-of-americans-oppose-obama-hhs-mandate/

June poll of Registered Voters by QEV Analytics commissioned by The Catholic Association reported @

http://www.lifenews.com/2012/06/19/new-poll-hhs-mandate-hurts-obama-with-women-catholics/

2 Comments

Filed under Abortion, Barack Obama, Democrats, Economy, Elections, First Amendment, HHS, Law, Media Bias, Obamacare, Polls, Race Relations, Religious Liberty, Unemployment

Desegregation and conservative values

Click on graphics to embiggen.

Chrissy’s Site Bites @ http://news.webshots.com/photo/2612539630056011884FVkSLm

Chrissy’s Site Bites @ http://news.webshots.com/photo/2374120310056011884YISEqy

If you like this, you might also enjoy @ https://polination.wordpress.com/2012/06/09/1957-civil-rights-act/

Comments Off on Desegregation and conservative values

Filed under Civil Rights, Education, Race Relations, Supreme Court

The Race Card passed its expiry date a long time ago

Click on graphics to embiggen.

Chrissy’s Site Bites @ http://news.webshots.com/photo/2004664260056011884bZtPsn

Chrissy’s Site Bites @ http://news.webshots.com/photo/2670106600056011884VlTvYb

Chrissy’s Site Bites @ http://news.webshots.com/photo/2654868530056011884bjVnBd

If you like this, you might also enjoy @ https://polination.wordpress.com/2012/04/10/the-hypocrisy-of-progressives-of-pallor/

1 Comment

Filed under Barack Obama, Immigration, John McCain, Mitt Romney, Obamacare, Polls, Race Relations

Racism straight up

Since 1973, abortion has killed more than 17 million black babies.

Planned Parenthood performs about 25% of all abortions in the United States. Planned Parenthood clinics are most frequently sited in minority neighborhoods.

This is no accident. Planned Parenthood was founded by eugenicist Margaret Sanger with the specific intention of eliminating unwanted races from the human population.

She said Blacks, immigrants and the mentally and physically unfit should not be allowed to breed. She wrote,

“We should hire three or four colored ministers, preferably with social-service backgrounds, and with engaging personalities. The most successful educational approach to the Negro is through a religious appeal. We don’t want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population. And the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.”

In 2009, Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg clearly agreed, praising legal abortion for helping to curb “growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of” like those who qualified for Medicaid.

Margaret Sanger the Greatest Sin is Children [:53]

More Words From Margaret Sanger [2:30]

For more on this, go to
http://www.nationalblackprolifeunion.com/Margaret-Sanger-and-The-Negro-Project.html

4 Comments

Filed under Abortion, Planned Parenthood, Race Relations, Supreme Court

Stoking the fires


Chrissy’s Site Bites @ http://news.webshots.com/photo/2319118270056011884eyTmTk
Click on graphic to embiggen.

Recommended reading:

“The Man Who Would Be Dictator”
By Burt Prelutsky – Friday, May 11, 2012

Excerpt: How do I hate Barack Obama? I might spin Elizabeth Barrett Browning’s immortal words and say, “Let me count the ways. I hate him to the depth and breadth and height my soul can reach.” But even that doesn’t quite cover the contempt I have for this past and present community agitator.

Fifty long years after Martin Luther King suggested we judge a person by his character, this slug is still waging race warfare. While we are all well-aware that he is basing his entire re-election campaign on separating Americans and playing to wealth envy, religious differences and even engendering gender divisions, it is his insistence on stoking up racial hatred that makes him the archenemy of everything decent that America represents.

Only Obama would have made the openly racist Eric Holder his attorney general. Only Obama would have remained silent when Holder refused to indict the Black Panthers for voter intimidation. Only Obama would have said that Trayvon Martin reminded him of the son he never had.

On the other hand, only Obama would have remained silent when his cohorts, Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson, converged on Sanford, Florida, and incited the black mobs to demand George Zimmerman’s bloodied head on a platter. Only Obama would have prevented his Department of Justice from demanding that the Black Panthers be indicted for offering a bounty on young Mr. Zimmerman, dead or alive.

Read the rest @ http://www.burtprelutsky.com/2012/05/man-who-would-be-dictator.html

Comments Off on Stoking the fires

Filed under Louis Farrakhan, Martin Luther King, Race Relations