Category Archives: Elections

Voter ID isn’t racism

American liberals who oppose voter ID regulations WANT our system to remain open to fraud. There is no other explanation.

Chrissy’s Site Bites @ http://news.webshots.com/photo/2487169900056011884AwMARs

Click on graphic to embiggen.

If you like this, you might also enjoy @ https://polination.wordpress.com/2012/01/14/majority-support-voter-id-laws/

H/t to Mindful Webworker for source @ http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/07/14/voter-id-mexicos-system-better-than-americas

4 Comments

Filed under Elections, Race Relations, Vote Fraud, Voter ID

May Captain Zero live up to his name!

Chrissy’s Site Bites @ http://news.webshots.com/photo/2720705560056011884dbBZyG

Click on graphic to embiggen.

If you like this, you might also enjoy @ https://polination.wordpress.com/2011/12/03/in-good-company/

1 Comment

Filed under Barack Obama, Elections

Walking back on another ethical issue

There’s nothing illegal about displaying the presidential seal at a political event. Most sitting presidents have done it. What’s obnoxious is the holier than thou policy they announced back in 2010 and are now ignoring.

It reminds me of Obama’s 2007 promise to use public campaign financing if his opponent did. That ethical standard was also abandoned when Obama started raking in millions and McCain had committed to the public spending limit of $84.1 million.

In fact, Obama was the first major-party presidential candidate to turn down public financing for a general election campaign since the system was created in the aftermath of Watergate.

And, being the schmuck he is, he said he was ONLY doing it because we had such a broken system and Republicans are so eeeeeeeeeeeevil that they game that broken system to win elections.

Riiight. It had NOTHING at ALL to do with the hundreds of millions you had pouring in to your campaign. Just like deciding to use the presitigious Presidential Seal at campaign events has NOTHING at ALL to do with your sagging support and crummy poll numbers. /sarc

 

 

1 Comment

Filed under Barack Obama, Elections, John McCain, Republicans

Some good news for our side

I just finished scoping out four opinion polls about the HHS mandate that date from February, March, May and June of this year. For those who want it, the data and URLs are provided below. But first, here are my thoughts.

A May poll of Adult Americans showed a very high degree of passion and support for freedom of religion above all else. It’s very rare to get a ZERO in the Meh crowd. [Meh = Don’t Know, No Opinion, It Depends.] But that’s what this poll found when they asked,

“Should freedom of religion be protected, even if it conflicts with other laws?”

26% No vs. 74% Yes vs. 0% Meh.

Clearly, as a nation, we really care about religious freedom. I have seen this 1:3 split in other polls on hot issues, including in another question from that same May poll.

“Is it morally wrong to force health care workers and doctors to provide abortion when they object for religious reasons?”

27% No vs. 72% Yes vs. 1% Meh.

I believe the 1:3 reflects the Hard-Left vs. Center-Right divide in America today. The Democrat Media Complex blats about how they are the majority and we are the extremist fringey tinfoil hatters. But the real truth is the opposite.

This is something to keep in mind when talking to those critical Undecided voters. The Hard-Leftists are already committed to the Democrats, so the likelihood that an Undecided is fundamentally Center-Right on most issues is very, very high. Find their hot buttons and focus on how Obama Democrats have violated those core values.

I saw another phenomenon in the May poll that I’ve seen before. Despite 74% of these same people saying they supported freedom of religion above all else, when the questions got specific about birth control, abortion, etc., support for the primacy of religious freedom dropped to between 51% and 58%.

But it shouldn’t have mattered whether the question was “Does religious freedom trump everything?” or “Does religious freedom trump this, that or the other thing?” Everything should mean everything, right? Except apparently it didn’t for about one-third of the people who said it did.

I see the same disconnect in presidential approval polls. When the question is “Do you approve of the job Obama is doing?”, the numbers are always higher than they are for subordinate issues, like “Do you approve of the job Obama is doing on the economy?” or “the war in Afghanistan?” etc.

The best explanation I can come up with is that people weenie out on reporting their real opinions when there is a hot button issue in the question. The Democrat Media Complex hounds us with certain messages about what it means to be a “good” person. Like, “If you don’t like Barack Obama, you’re a dirty RAAAAACIST!!!” And “If you don’t support birth control, you HATE WOMEN!!!” So the poll questions that include a culturally-charged anxiety trigger get a less honest answer than one that homes in on a core value.

It could be the other way around. I.e., that these people are all for religious freedom as long as it doesn’t interfere with them getting free stuff. I hope not. Freedom of religion is the reason many of us (or our ancestors) left everything familiar to come here. I think we’re more attached to it than the Left realizes.

If I’m right, then the higher number in the straight-up “religious freedom is primary” question is the accurate number while the lower numbers that are attached to culturally-charged anxiety triggers are less accurate. I guess we’ll find out in November when voters are not answering a live pollster … “What will she think of me?!” … but casting secret ballots that will help decide the fate of the nation.

The March poll provides support for my thesis. It asked twice about forcing health insurance plans to provide free birth control, once for just anybody and then again for groups that have moral or religious objections to birth control. Where the question was purely secular, opposition to mandatory free birth control was 51%. But when they mentioned religious or moral objections in the question, opposition increased by 6 points. And notice in the June poll that the HHS mandate issue ALONE has resulted in a 13% to 16% shift toward opposition to Obama!

I think the lesson for us is clear.

When we’re talking with those critical Undecideds who will swing this close race for or against us, we should couch the discussions in terms of CORE values.

“It’s not about birth control. It’s about keeping the government from forcing people to violate their religious beliefs.”

“This is not about race. We elected a black man to our highest office. We’ve proven we aren’t a racist nation anymore. Now we need to ask if he has fixed the economy and gotten people back to work like he said he would.”

One final point … I’m interested in how well our messaging is getting past the alphabet media blockade, so I snooped through the data to see if I could see any signs that there’s been a shift in opinion over the five months these polls tracked. I think there has been and it’s to our side.

Three polls asked variations on the generic question: Should health insurance plans be required to provide free birth control? The February poll showed 43% of Likely Voters opposed, but the March and May polls both showed 51% of Adult Americans opposed. Since Likely Voters generally poll more Center-Right than Adult Americans, the actual shift toward support for religious freedom may have been even higher than 8%. And it’s held up against the Left’s onslaughts.

Thank God for the First Amendment, talk radio, the internet and our church pulpits!

A Survey of recent opinion polls re: The HHS Mandate

February 2012 (Likely Voters)

Should health insurance companies be required by law to provide free …

… Contraception: 43% No.

… Morning after pills: 50% No.

March 2012 (Adult Americans)

Should health insurance plans for all employees have to cover the full cost of birth control for female employees or should employers be able to opt out for moral or religious reasons?

Plans offered by secular institutions: 40% Must cover vs. 51% Opt out vs. 9% Meh.

Plans offered by religious institutions: 36% Must cover vs. 57% Opt out vs. 7% Meh.

CtH: The second “Opt out” is 6% higher and the Meh is 2% lower. Another sign that we have a special place in our hearts for protecting religious freedom.

May 2012 (Adult Americans)

Should freedom of religion be protected, even if it conflicts with other laws?

Adults: 74% Yes vs. 26% No vs. 0% Meh.

Is it morally wrong to force health care workers and doctors to provide abortion when they object for religious reasons?

Adults: 72% Yes vs. 27% No vs. 1% Meh.

Should individual health care providers and organizations providing health insurance policies be allowed to opt out of providing …

Abortion: 58% Yes vs. 38% No vs. 4% Meh

Birth control pills: 51% Yes vs. 46% No vs. 3% Meh

Abortion-inducing drugs: 51% Yes vs. 44% No vs. 5% Meh

Medication to speed the death of a terminally ill patient: 55% Yes vs. 41% No vs. 4% Meh

In vitro fertilization treatments that could result in the death of an embryo: 52% Yes vs. 41% No vs. 7% Meh

Do you believe …

… Contraception is morally acceptable? 88% Yes.

… Abortion is wrong in an of itself? 58% Yes.

June 2012 (Registered Voters)

Is providing free birth control worthy of federal concern?

Catholics: 57% No vs. 37% Yes.

Women: 44% No vs. 51% Yes.

Does the federal government have the right to force morally objectionable coverage on religious institutions?

Women: 57% No.

Should birth control be treated like any other drug, without mandatory coverage?

Catholics: 67% Yes. Women 63% Yes.

Will the HHS mandate make you less likely to vote for Obama, more likely to vote for Obama, or have no impact on your vote?

Religiously active white females: 38% Less Likely vs. 12% More Likely. (38 – 12 = 16 away from Obama)

Catholics: 29% Less Likely vs. 13% More Likely. (29 – 13 = 16 away from Obama)

Independents: 28% Less Likely vs. 15% More Likely. (28 – 15 = 13 away from Obama)

Sources

February poll of Likely Voters by Rasmussen reported @

http://www.lifenews.com/2012/02/22/poll-americans-oppose-obama-birth-control-coverage-mandate/

March poll of Adult Americans by New York Times/CBS News reported @

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2012/03/13/us/politics/president-obamas-approval-rating-drops.html?ref=politics

May poll of Adult Americans by Marist College commissioned by the Knights of Columbus reported @

http://www.lifenews.com/2012/05/22/poll-majority-of-americans-oppose-obama-hhs-mandate/

June poll of Registered Voters by QEV Analytics commissioned by The Catholic Association reported @

http://www.lifenews.com/2012/06/19/new-poll-hhs-mandate-hurts-obama-with-women-catholics/

2 Comments

Filed under Abortion, Barack Obama, Democrats, Economy, Elections, First Amendment, HHS, Law, Media Bias, Obamacare, Polls, Race Relations, Religious Liberty, Unemployment

Good news in Ohio

Click on graphics to embiggen.

In 2012, Ohio will be worth 18 electoral votes.

In 1980, Reagan won Ohio by 10.6%.

Chrissy’s Site Bites @ http://news.webshots.com/photo/2988612730056011884NqFYSn

In 2008, Obama won Ohio by 4.58%.

Chrissy’s Site Bites @ http://news.webshots.com/photo/2558846880056011884CCsvWv

Support for Romney has shown a slow, but steady increase.

Nov 2011: Obama 50% vs Romney 41%

Jan 2012: Obama 49% vs Romney 42%

May 2012: Obama 50% vs Romney 43%

Jun 2012: Obama 47% vs Romney 44%

Meanwhile, Obama’s approval numbers took a big hit in the past month.

May 2012: Obama Approval 48% vs Disapproval 48%

Jun 2012: Obama Approval 44% vs Disapproval 51%

His support among his own base dropped 5%.

May 2012: Obama Democrats 88%

Jun 2012: Obama Democrats 83%

If you like this, you might also enjoy @ http://news.webshots.com/photo/2659871640056011884sZssld

Sources:

http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/main/2012/05/obama-up-7-in-ohio.html

http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/2011/PPP_Release_OH_062612.pdf

http://uselectionatlas.org/RESULTS/national.php?year=1980

http://uselectionatlas.org/RESULTS/national.php?year=2008

Comments Off on Good news in Ohio

Filed under Barack Obama, Democrats, Elections, Mitt Romney, Polls, Republicans, Ronald Reagan

Visualize November

Chrissy’s Site Bites @ http://news.webshots.com/photo/2270514720056011884qNOcXJ

Click on graphic to embiggen.

If you like this, you might also enjoy @ https://polination.wordpress.com/2012/05/12/check-it-out-2/

Comments Off on Visualize November

Filed under Elections, Jimmy Carter, Ronald Reagan

Another Cold War?

This is a “Must Watch” video!

June 20, 2012: Krauthammer and O’Reilly on Obama’s G20 presser [2:56]

This is really serious stuff … really SCARY stuff. Reagan brought an end to the Cold War without firing a shot; Obama appears to be assisting the Russians in getting it going again.

Remember this?

Chrissy’s Site Bites @ http://news.webshots.com/photo/2411160030056011884lrEGGU

When you consider the garbage he’s pulled when he still had a re-election campaign ahead of him, this is really really frightening!

Source for graphic @ http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/03/president-obama-asks-medvedev-for-space-on-missile-defense-after-my-election-i-have-more-flexibility/

H/t Pete for Krauthammer-O’Reilly video @ https://polination.wordpress.com/2012/06/20/the-wednesday-grudge-44/#comment-15007

Comments Off on Another Cold War?

Filed under Barack Obama, Charles Krauthammer, Defense, Elections

The Hidden Coup

By Mark Crutcher of Life Dynamics. Reprinted with permission.

Our parents warned us to always be careful what we ask for because we just might get it. It is sound advice that tends to get ignored, thus leaving us exposed to the unforeseen and unwelcome consequences that follow.

For generations, cynical voters have been asking for politicians who keep their campaign promises. In 2008, their wish was granted. Barack Obama was handed the keys to the Oval Office after faithfully promising the American people that he would fundamentally change their nation.

It is a promise he is keeping with a vengeance. Many of the principles upon which America was built have already been eliminated and those that remain are in his cross-hairs. Obama is now the center of a personality cult that is, with breathtaking speed, transforming us into the Marxist utopia he was so seduced by during his time at Harvard.

It is correctly said that elections have consequences and I can find no better proof of that than the one that gave us Barack Obama. Because of it, we now find ourselves in a precarious situation that threatens the very survival of the country. Even if Obama loses in November, it will take decades of Herculean effort to undo the damage he’s done. On the other hand, if he wins, there will shortly come a time when we will be living in a country that we cannot imagine today and will not recognize then.

The political and cultural ramifications of this are being cussed and discussed by people far brighter than I will ever be. But in the midst of all this, important questions are being overlooked about the long-term effects of Obamaism on the Black population.

First, by now, it must be clear to even the most oblivious of our fellow citizens that this guy is in way over his head. Any way you look at it, we are now in the final stages of a four-year amateur night at the White House. What we don’t know is whether voters will see this as an indictment of Obama, Democrats and liberals, or as a referendum on African-American politicians in general. If that turns out to be the case, we might look back one day and conclude that the first Black president saw to it that there would not be a second one for another 150 years.

Second, polls consistently show that Blacks are far more pro-life and far more opposed to the homosexual agenda than the population as a whole. Yet they broadly support a man who has been the most radically pro-abortion and pro-homosexual president in American history. In the field of psychiatry, this phenomenon is called “cognitive dissonance” and it occurs when people behave in a manner that conflicts with their belief system. Interestingly, this trait is commonly found among members of cults.

Whether Obamaism meets the definition of a cult or not is, obviously, open to interpretation. However, it is hard to imagine that there will not be negative repercussions within the Black community for having blindly followed a man who is so out of step with them on these two core-value moral issues.

Finally, and perhaps most importantly, consider the following: since the 1960s, Martin Luther King has been the greatest presence in the African-American community and cast the biggest shadow in the struggle for civil-rights. For more than fifty years, he has been a man among boys and Black families have been able to hold him up to their children as the symbol of what African-Americans can do and can become.

The danger we now face is that Dr. King may soon be replaced by Barack Obama as America’s preeminent Black role model. Should that happen, and it certainly seems plausible that it will, the results will be disastrous for the country in general and the Black community in particular.

Of course, some will not see this as an “either/or” situation and suggest that both can serve in this capacity. Those people are wrong. In reality, this is a textbook “either/or” situation. It is completely illogical to contend that Dr. King’s devotion to the advancement of fundamental American values is compatible with Obama’s advocacy of godless statism and Black Liberation Theology. As a practical matter, the only way for one philosophy to prevail is for the other one to be destroyed.

So whether the country realizes it or not, we stand at a crossroads. To put it simply: Martin Luther King was a unifier; Barack Obama is a divider. And if our fate is for the latter to replace the former as the symbol of Black America, we’re all in deep trouble.

2 Comments

Filed under Abortion, Barack Obama, Elections, Martin Luther King

THE SATURDAY GRUDGE

Posted by Pistol Pete

Just a short post today,since nobody’s around on the weekend anyway.

Just a few words about Obama’s naked power grab yesterday.I truly believe that almost unlimited power is driving him mad.He has a big,empty hole where his soul should be that all the lies,theft and pain he can inflict won’t fill.When you listen to his speech listing all the conditions for amnesty,no criminal record,must live here five years,blah,blah,blah,remember it all means NOTHING!No one cares if they meet the criteria or not,he desperately needs all the illegal votes he can get.Never mind the increased competition for jobs,the added pressure on social services or the increase in crime.As long as it helps him win,that’s all he cares about.I am thoroughly convinced there is no depth he won’t sink to,no law he won’t break in an effort to hang on to his power.We  must all pray and work to rid ourselves of this virus before the damage he does becomes irreparable.

 

 

33 Comments

Filed under Amnesty, Barack Obama, Elections, Immigration

Unions going thumbs down on Obama

Obama refused to personally rally on behalf of the public sector unions in Wisconsin, literally flying over the state on the critical days before the Governor Walker’s recall election.

To add insult to injury, when asked why he didn’t go to Wisconsin, the President claimed he was too busy, which was a total lie. He was on a record fundraising spree … NINE events in the four days prior to the election … some of them in States right next door to Wisconsin.

He had plenty of time to keep his promise to “put on comfortable shoes” and show some moral support to the unions who worked so hard and spent so much to help him win the presidency in 2008. He just couldn’t be bothered. And now he’s going to pay.

A recent Gallup poll shows that union members understand Obama threw them under the bus.

2008 union members voted: Obama 67% vs. McCain 30%

2012 union members prefer: Obama 57% vs. Romney 35%

And the AFL-CIO has decided to shift funds away from political candidates, including President Obama. A union spokesman said, “We wanted to start investing our funds in our own infrastructure and advocacy.” In 2008, this same union built up a massive political structure in the months leading up the election, including extensive “Get Out The Vote” efforts, as well as financial contributions to help Obama and his fellow Democrats win their super majority.

In other cheerful news, Rasmussen shows a 16% increase (44% in 2008 vs. 60% now) in the number of Likely Voters who believe the next President will likely be a Republican.

And on May 30, 2012, Moveon dot org sent out a rather desperate-sounding begging letter saying,

“If we can’t increase our budget, we might have to dramatically scale back or pull the plug on some of MoveOn’s most important election efforts this year. … Click here to chip in $5 and help MoveOn take on more campaigns this election season. … In 2008, MoveOn was one of the first groups to endorse President Obama, and we then recruited 1 million volunteers who went door to door, made phone calls, and helped provide the surge of grassroots support necessary to elect Obama.”

After what they did to General Petraeus, seeing them begging for fivers is just too too sweet!

Sources:

http://www.gallup.com/poll/155138/Majority-Union-Members-Favor-Obama-Third-Back-Romney.aspx

http://washingtonexaminer.com/politics/washington-secrets/2012/06/now-union-members-are-deserting-obama/721241

http://www.usnews.com/news/blogs/washington-whispers/2012/06/13/afl-cio-redeploying-funds-from-obama-campaign-to-advocacy-and-infrastructure

http://www.nationalreview.com/campaign-spot/302490/obama-wisconsin-democrats-ive-just-been-so-busy-lately

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/mood_of_america/partisan_politics

http://moveonorgnfo.blogspot.com/2012/05/we-might-have-to-pull-plug.html

H/t Pete

4 Comments

Filed under Barack Obama, Democrats, Elections, Republicans, Unions