Category Archives: Republicans

The Extreme Ugliness of the Left

Click on graphics to embiggen.

Chrissy’s Site Bites @ http://news.webshots.com/photo/2699175460056011884NdoZSZ

Chrissy’s Site Bites @ http://news.webshots.com/photo/2827729800056011884maLYlo

If you like this, you might also want to read @ https://polination.wordpress.com/2012/09/06/democrat-whack-jobs/

2 Comments

Filed under Democrats, Republicans

The First Birthers

Clintons Knew Obama Ineligible & DNC Primary Fraud – Claims Hollywood Producer [6:50]

 Apr 3, 2012 – Most people believe that the Obama Birther Movement was started by Republicans and or the Tea Party.  Hollywood Producer Bettina Viviano says that the Clintons were the original birthers and that they only stopped talking about it when their daughter’s life was threatened.

Chrissy’s Site Bites @ http://news.webshots.com/photo/2174176180056011884vUFpKs

This 2008 convention vote was about as meaningful as that fraudulent “2/3” vote the other night to put God and Jerusalem back into the platform.

If you like this, you might also want to read @ https://polination.wordpress.com/2012/09/06/division-at-the-dem-convention/

8 Comments

Filed under ACORN, Barack Obama, Bill Clinton, Democrats, Elections, Hillary Clinton, Hollywood, Republicans, Vote Fraud

Two more reasons to vote Republican

As if you needed them!

1. Democrats think they’re smarter, but they’re not.

Chrissy’s Site Bites @ http://news.webshots.com/photo/2074666300056011884kWAmGG

2. Democrats think they’re morally superior, but they’re not.

Chrissy’s Site Bites @ http://news.webshots.com/photo/2772267960056011884dQrlEY

If you like this, you might also want to read @ https://polination.wordpress.com/2012/09/03/either-way-vote-republican/

Click on graphics to embiggen.

1 Comment

Filed under Democrats, Elections, Elizabeth Warren, Republicans

16 Trillion reasons to NOT vote for Democrats

In their own words [1:21]

From 2003 to 2007, Congress and President Bush overspent the nation’s budget so much that they increased the national debt by 33%. In order to make this legal, they voted three times to increase the statutory debt limit from $7,384 billion in 2003 to $9,815 billion in 2007.

To understand this in personal terms, think of taxpayers (present and future) as joints owners of a credit card company and Congress and President Bush as the card holder. The rest of us shlubs can only get an increase on our credit card debt limits when the card company decides we can be trusted to pay it back, right?

Well, what Congress and President Bush did was give themselves a credit limit increase … to the tune of 2½ Trillion dollars! And We, The People … all the taxpayers (present and future) who will ultimately eat the debt these turkeys ran up had nothing to say in the matter.

And, as if that wasn’t bad enough, some of the money they borrowed to finance their spending came from Social Security. That’s right. They raided our joint retirement savings, money we set aside for our futures, to finance their present over-spending. Pretty slimey, right?

Think back to 2006 and 2008.  Remember the Democrats’ political rhetoric about this? Remember how people like Nancy Pelosi and Barack Obama railed against the irresponsibility and injustice of it all? Remember how that’s one of the reasons we voted them into office?

Don’t you feel enormously betrayed that, the minute they got into power, they INCREASED spending and INCREASED the deficit so fast and by so much that they made George W. Bush look like Ebenezer Scrooge by comparison?!

Democrats took majority control of Congress in January 2007, but spending is (usually) off-set a year, because each year, Congress is supposed to plan spending for the following year.

 Usually … in 2009, the Pelosi-Reid-Obama Democrat Hat Trick government added the $800 Billion Stimulus spending bill to the 2009 budget that was passed in 2008. Politically, it makes no difference, because the 2008 Congress was controlled by Democrats anyway. But they like to claim all that 2009 spending somehow belongs to Bush, who was RETIRED in TEXAS when the Stimulus spending was tacked on, and the eeevil Republicans, who were in the minority in Congress!

Keep in mind that Congress writes and passes federal spending plans.  The President makes recommendations, but when it comes to actual budget legislation, his only power lies in signing or vetoing.

In 2008, Canadidate Obama made a well-advertised promise to “go through the budget line by line” but the fact is, the President of the United States does not have line item veto. It’s all or nothing.

You can blame the Republican majority Congresses under Bush for that 33% increase to $9,815 billion in 2007.  But the Pelosi-Reid 2007-2008 Congress (with Obama in the Senate) increased spending so much that they DOUBLED the Republican deficit IN THEIR FIRST YEAR. 

 (The national DEBT is the total amount we owe. Each year, the government takes in some amount and spends some amount. If the income is higher, the budget SURPLUS reduces the DEBT. If the spending is higher, the budget DEFICIT increases the DEBT.)

The second budget they passed (in 2008 for 2009) was higher still and, shortly after they got their Hat Trick with Obama in the White House and Democrat majorities in both the House and the Senate, they passed the 2009 stimulus spending bill and added ANOTHER $800 Billion to the already bloated 2009 deficit!

They haven’t even bothered to pass any budgets since then. They just keep spending. And when they hit the debt ceiling, they did what they had shrieked was totally unacceptable when Bush Republicans did it. I.e., they increased the statutory debt limit so they could keep right on spending and debting and stealing from our retirements and our childrens’ futures.

So please … when you hear Democrats like Barack Obama bleat about the evil Republican Romney-Ryan spending plan, take it with $16 Trillion dollars worth of salt. Because that’s what the national debt has hit, thanks to six years of leadership by the exact same people who bellowed back in 2007 that Bush’s $9.8 Trillion debt was irresponsible and unpatriotic.

Chrissy’s Site Bites @ http://news.webshots.com/photo/2364566090056011884shsqur

Click on graphic to embiggen.

———————————-

Sources for debt information:

Treasury Department’s November 2007 report on Public Debt for Fiscal Years 2007 and 2006 Summary:

Click to access feddebt_ann2007.pdf

US Budget Deficit: 2008 Doubles 2007

http://uspolitics.about.com/b/2008/09/10/us-budget-deficit-2008-double-2007.htm

Gross Federal Debt chart – 1940-2007

http://uspolitics.about.com/od/thefederalbudget/ig/Political-Economic-Measures/Gross-Federal-Debt—1940-2007.htm

Comments Off on 16 Trillion reasons to NOT vote for Democrats

Filed under Barack Obama, Budget, Democrats, Economy, George W. Bush, National Debt, Republicans

Either way, vote Republican

Click on graphics to embiggen.

Chrissy’s Site Bites @ http://news.webshots.com/photo/2602510860056011884iDqGRI

Chrissy’s Site Bites @ http://news.webshots.com/photo/2071417000056011884wHoXIn

2 Comments

Filed under Democrats, Republicans, Unemployment

More Left-Wing Tolerance

Chrissy’s Site Bites @ http://news.webshots.com/photo/2224274090056011884sMQvfC

Click on graphic to embiggen.

If you like this, you might also enjoy @ https://polination.wordpress.com/2012/07/01/cher-the-hypocritical-bigot/

2 Comments

Filed under Democrats, Republicans

Unemployment under Obama, Bush, Clinton

2012 to 1993 Unemployment under Obama, Bush, Clinton

Click on graphic to embiggen.

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics @ http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS14000000

8 Comments

Filed under Democrats, Republicans, Unemployment

DNC says “NO” to kids

Click on graphics to embiggen.

Chrissy’s Site Bites @ http://news.webshots.com/photo/2469131460056011884VgwBSr

I’m guessing Malia and Sasha Obama won’t have any more trouble getting in to the convention than they did attending the White House Easter Egg Rolls that were barred to every other private school kid in D.C.

Chrissy’s Site Bites @ http://news.webshots.com/photo/2626462120056011884tdLXUB

If you like this, you might also enjoy @ https://polination.wordpress.com/2011/04/07/pelosi-lies-what-else-is-new/

Source:

http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/no-babies-allowed-at-democratic-national-convention-feminists-revolt

H/t: Pistol Pete

3 Comments

Filed under Democrats, Republicans

Drawing a line in the sand

As head of the Archdiocese of New York and president of the Conference of Catholic Bishops, Cardinal Dolan is the biggest honcho in the American branch of the Roman Catholic Church. A while ago, he agreed to deliver the prime-time benediction at the Republican convention in Tampa next week. Since he didn’t want to appear partisan, he told the Dems he would be happy and grateful to deliver a prayer at their convention in Charlotte.

They haven’t called. I doubt Dolan is holding his breath! LOL

The Democrats have announced that a “high ranking” Catholic (to be named later) is going to offer a benediction in Charlotte, but it’s not likely to be the guy heading up the Catholic fight against the Obama Administration’s war on religious freedom. Likely, the “prayer” (such as it is) will be led by one of the bishops who still support the left-wing.

Democrats are really drawing a line in the sand these days!

Catholics have been voting Democrats ever since Irish and Italian Catholics made up the bulk of the unwashed, uneducated, immigrant groups the early 20th c. establishment GOP couldn’t like.

Chrissy’s Site Bites @ http://news.webshots.com/photo/2433107050056011884AtAXEu

After we got our first and so-far only Catholic president, the Democrat Martyred Saint of Camelot, John F. Kennedy, the American Catholic commitment to voting D got even stronger.

However, since Roe v. Wade, the Democratic Party has increasingly chucked Pro-Lifers under the bus. You’d think this might be a problem for Catholics and it has been for about half of us. But old prejudices die hard.

When I turned 18, I never once considered registering Republican. I worked on Carter’s campaign during my first presidential season as a voter; until McCain, it was the only campaign I volunteered for.

But my revulsion for murdering helpless infants proved to be a lot stronger than my Catholic Democrat indoctrination. (It probably helped that I was only 9 when JFK was assassinated.) Anyway, I crossed over to the Right to Life Party and stayed there for decades, voting that line if I could, or going with the most Pro-Life candidate running.

When the Right to Life Party folded, they sent me a letter encouraging me to register Republican. When I read that, I experienced a visceral and incredibly negative gut reaction. It was like they’d told me to eat dog poop or something. It both shocked and shamed me to discover that I had any anti-Republican prejudice in me, much less one of such potency!

So, I held my nose, changed my registration to R and since then have been working on my attitude by learning more about the history of the two major parties. What a shocker to discover it was Democrats who founded the KKK and Republicans who pushed civil rights legislation!

Until very recently, the Catholic “social justice” crowd has held sway with about half of the American Catholic voters. In my experience, these are mostly the folks who think Jesus was a Liberal and therefore whatever Democrats do is What Jesus Would Do. It’s especially prevalent among those who live and work in areas where being Pro-Life equates with being a Right-Wing Religious Nut. (Like where I was born and still live.)

We knew, back in 2008, that Barack Obama was so overtly Pro-Abortion that he deep-sixed Illinois legislation that would have provided medical and comfort care to abortion survivors. IMHO, it takes a really cold, heartless bastard to insist helpless, naked babies be left alone to die. We KNEW this about him and we TOLD our fellow Catholics about it.

When Dearest challenged our pastor on this issue, she handed him a 3-page article that basically boiled down to “It’s okay to ignore the unborn in the name of voting Democrat, because Democrats are the good people who support social justice or something.” Seriously. Dearest and I both read it carefully. There was not a word of Scripture or Catholic teaching in it anywhere, just lots of Democrat Talking Points and muddy logic.

It was crap, but it worked. Check out the Catholic vote for the past 3 presidential elections:

Chrissy’s Site Bites @ http://news.webshots.com/photo/2846502120056011884YVzfXU

It has taken the Obama Democrats actually throwing Catholic sensibilities TOTALLY under the bus to wake half of these twits up. And Cardinal Dolan, God bless him, is leading the charge away from Democrat Talking Points and back toward the Gospel as Jesus Christ actually preached it.

In a recent poll of 900 self-identified Catholic registered voters, only 27% said they support Obama. With over 77 million Catholics in the United States, a drop from 54% to 27% will be devastating to Obama’s totals. Hee hee!

If you liked this, you might also enjoy https://polination.wordpress.com/2012/02/18/dolan-one-of-new-cardinals/

H/t: Pistol Pete

Source:

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/08/24/Obama-and-Social-Justice-Democrats-Tell-Catholic-Cardinal-to-Stay-Away-from-DNC

http://www.pewforum.org/Politics-and-Elections/How-the-Faithful-Voted.aspx

http://www.humanevents.com/2012/08/24/obama-catholic-support-cut-in-half-only-27-of-catholics-support-abortion-president-today-video/

Comments Off on Drawing a line in the sand

Filed under Abortion, Catholic Church, Democrats, Elections, Republicans, Timothy Dolan

Bakin’ AkinBacon

This whole Akin thing is very frustrating to me, and not for all the usual reasons. I am very distressed by the attitudes toward him that conservatives have brought to the discussion, in pretty much every venue where I’ve heard or seen him discussed. Personally, I think he’s a funny-looking, dweeby, little nerd with a bad comb-over, and not that appealing even with his mouth shut. I think his staying in the race is more about him than it is winning the Senate for the conservative cause. If the votes were cast now, he’d lose decisively against a woman who shouldn’t have a chance to win. His recent troubles, according to Rasmussen, have not just changed MO from a safe Republican Senate win, but they have also put the winning of MO’s electoral votes at risk for the Romney/Ryan ticket. These are all bad things. We can agree on all of this.

However, let’s put that part aside for a few moments, after acknowledging that if a Democrat had said something like this, not only would it not still be front-page news, but most of us would never have heard anything about it because it wouldn’t have been reported in the first place! I want to talk about the special vitriol directed towards Akin for being so stupid as to even believe such idiocy, the ignorant fool! Why ARE conservatives so angry towards him? Why do you think he’s so INCREDIBLY S.T.U.P.I.D.? I contend that many think and feel the way they do because they have been manipulated to do so. Akin is stupid because we were told from the outset that he is stupid and we can know this because only stupid people would stupidly cling to such a stupid idea from their stupidly-ignorant, stupid heads…especially from a stupid state like stupid Missouri. I could go on, but I think you get the idea. Because–politics aside–I think the media is tricking conservatives into furthering the leftist agenda, I want to present an opposing idea. Having presented it, I’ve got no further bull in this fight and won’t be out with my red cape, directing traffic. Feel free to argue it amongst yourselves, but this is my whole contribution. At least I HOPE it’s a contribution, because I am more disturbed by conservatives’ reactions to Akin’s remarks than I am by the remarks themselves. Here’s why:

I became a registered nurse in 1969. For the next 4 decades, except for maternity leaves (4), sick time, vacations, etc., I was continually employed in my chosen profession, mostly in-hospital. 30 of those years were spent in labor and delivery. At the time I became disabled, I had more working seniority than almost any other nurse in my department at the busy maternal/child tertiary center where I worked. I had professional medical experience coming out of my EARS, and during all that time, I believed the same thing Akin has just gotten in trouble for saying.

Somewhere, back in the mists of youth and time, I had heard (on more than one occasion) this issue discussed by medical people. I don’t remember when. I don’t remember who. I just know that it was presented as fact by experienced, educated people. I heard it, filed it away, and didn’t think a lot more about it. Let’s be fair–by the time ladies came to me for delivery, the question of conception had been pretty much resolved! So my line of work never required me to revisit my youthful “understanding” of this question. In fact, it was not until the Akin Bakin’ commenced, and I went online to find some documentation of this fact that he and I both KNEW, that I found out what I “knew” wasn’t really so. That was a big shock to me. I’m not sure I’ve recovered from it yet. But it’s left me with a lot of sympathy for a man whose public profile, and unfortunate conservative credentials, have caused him to be offered up as a human sacrifice on the Altar of Liberal Agendas…just for saying something that we both believed until just a few days ago. How thankful I am to be an insignificant peon!! When I make a mistake, nobody cares but me. Akin? A bipartisan lynch mob, over an honest error, and a VERY unfortunate turn-of-the-phrase in expressing it.

Personally, I like him less for what he’s done since his trouble began, than for the error that started this whole thing. But I will not attack him for getting a fact wrong…not when I’ve had the same misunderstanding, for at least 30 years, and acquired in my work in the health field,. You may object all you like to his stubbornness, his ego, his refusal to relinquish the pursuit for power, and many other legitimate concerns in this race. But to call him “stupid” is unfair. If you had had this idea (that a woman’s body has a mechanism that helps protect against pregnancy after rape), presented to you coherently, as it was to me, by sensible people you knew and trusted, and without the media–in full-throated rage–telling you upfront that it was “stupid” (and so was anyone who believed it), I think you would have made the same mistake Akin did in believing something that, when it counted, simply turned out to be NOT SO.

14 Comments

Filed under Abortion, Democrats, Elections, Republicans