Category Archives: Mitt Romney

I will NOT be holding my nose in November

In 2008, I voted against Obama and for Palin. But this fall, I will be not just voting against Obama, but also for Romney.

Obama’s Failed Investments: Warnings and Red Flags [1:11]

Obama’s taxpayer-funded investments failed, and thousands of workers lost their jobs. Obama has yet to take responsibility.

The Promise of America [2:30]

Americans love America and are tired of weak leadership.

5 Comments

Filed under Barack Obama, Economy, Elections, Mitt Romney, Unemployment

Soul Mate vs. Scum Bag

Soul Mate [1:36]

Ann Romney and her family share their thoughts on her struggle with Multiple Sclerosis.

vs.

John Edwards admits to extramartial affair [3:27]

John Edwards finally admits to having had an extramarital affair while his wife was fighting cancer.

Comments Off on Soul Mate vs. Scum Bag

Filed under Ann Romney, John Edwards, Mitt Romney

The Race Card passed its expiry date a long time ago

Click on graphics to embiggen.

Chrissy’s Site Bites @ http://news.webshots.com/photo/2004664260056011884bZtPsn

Chrissy’s Site Bites @ http://news.webshots.com/photo/2670106600056011884VlTvYb

Chrissy’s Site Bites @ http://news.webshots.com/photo/2654868530056011884bjVnBd

If you like this, you might also enjoy @ https://polination.wordpress.com/2012/04/10/the-hypocrisy-of-progressives-of-pallor/

1 Comment

Filed under Barack Obama, Immigration, John McCain, Mitt Romney, Obamacare, Polls, Race Relations

How the electoral vote is shaping up

Chrissy’s Site Bites @ http://news.webshots.com/photo/2155082180056011884EXZAcg

Click on graphic to embiggen.

BATTLEGROUNDS:

Florida (29): Obama won by a slim 2.8% margin and on May 3, 2012, Quinnipiac found Romney up by SIX! (Romney 47% vs. Obama 41%)

Ohio (18): Obama won by 4.6%. But on May 10, 2012, Quinnipiac found Obama up by only one. (Obama 45% vs. Romney 44%)

Pennsylvania (16): On May 21, 2012, Rasmussen had Obama up by six (Obama 47% vs. Romney 41%), but he won by 10.4% (Obama 54.7% vs. McCain 44.3%).  Karl Rove believes Obama’s antipathy toward coal and problems with working-class whites and suburban independents could tip the balance.

Virginia (13): Obama won by a healthy 6%. However on April 25, 2012, Rasmussen found Romney up by one. (Romney 45% vs. Obama 44%)

Wisconsin (10):  Obama won by 13.9%. In April, a Marquette poll (Likely Voters) found Obama’s up by four, but this week, he and Romney are TIED.

Colorado (9): On April 23, 2012, a Purple Strategies Poll (Likely Voters) showed Obama and Romney tied at 47% each.

Iowa (6): The most recent poll shows Obama up by ten, but Team Obama is targeting Ohio for special attention with TV ads, which suggests they’re worried.

Nevada (6): Latest poll (Rasmussen) shows Obama up by eight. But Nevada has the nation’s highest unemployment rate (11.7%).

New Hampshire (4): The polls are all over the place. The spread goes from Obama ahead by 12 to Romney ahead by 10. In 2004, Kerry won by only 1%.

—————————————————-
Breakdown of electoral vote changes due to 2010 Census

DARK RED States (McCain): Arizona +1, Georgia +1, South Carolina +1, Texas +4, Utah +1

LIGHT RED States (McCain): Louisiana -1, Missouri -1

SWING States (Obama): Florida +2, Nevada +1, Ohio -2

LIGHT BLUE States (Obama): Iowa -1

DARK BLUE States (Obama): Illinois -1, Massachusetts -1, Michigan -1, New Jersey -1, New York -2, Pennsylvania -1, Washington +1

Votes in last 4 Presidential Elections:
Dark Red GOP 4, Light Red GOP 3, Swing 2 & 2, Light Blue DNC 3, Dark Blue DNC 4
—————————————————-

Sources:

Which States Gained and Lost Electoral Votes

http://usgovinfo.about.com/od/thepoliticalsystem/a/2012-Electoral-Votes-By-State.htm

Rasmussen (Likely Voters) Daily Presidential Tracking Poll

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/obama_administration/daily_presidential_tracking_poll

Rasmussen Virginia Matchup – April 25, 2012

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2012/election_2012_presidential_election/virginia/election_2012_virginia_president

Quinnipiac Ohio Matchup (Registered Voters) – May 10, 2012

http://www.quinnipiac.edu/institutes-and-centers/polling-institute/ohio/release-detail?ReleaseID=1746

Quinnipiac Florida Matchup – May 3, 2012

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2012/05/23/romney_leads_obama_in_florida_114250.html

Rasmussen Pennsylvania Matchup – May 23, 2012

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2012/election_2012_presidential_election/pennsylvania/election_2012_pennsylvania_president

2008 Presidential Election Results in Pennsylvania

http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/election2008/pa.htm

Marquette (Likely Voters) Wisconsin Matchup – May 16, 2012

https://law.marquette.edu/poll/2012/05/16/marquette-law-school-poll-shows-walker-kleefisch-lead-in-recall/

Statewide opinion polling for US presidential election 2012

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statewide_opinion_polling_for_the_United_States_presidential_election,_2012

Purple Predictors

http://www.purplestrategies.com/wp-content/uploads/AprilPurplePoll_v9.pdf

Real Clear Politics New Hampshire poll summary

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/nh/new_hampshire_romney_vs_obama-2030.html#polls

Rove: Romney’s Roads to the White House By Karl Rove – May 23, 2012

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304840904577422200571363734.html

5 Comments

Filed under Barack Obama, Elections, John McCain, Mitt Romney, Polls

Losing the War on Women

According to Mike Flynn at Breitbart, WaPo is using its latest poll to blat that Obama is beating Romney by 2 points, 49-47.

But the poll sample included only 22% Republicans. Gallup shows 28% of Americans currently self-identify as Republican.

And, as Flynn notes, if only 22% of actual voters next November are Republicans,

“it would be about the lowest turnout for the GOP in modern history. In 2010, 35% of voters were Republican. In 2008, the year Obama swept into the White House, 32% of voters were Republican. Even in 2006, the year Democrats took control of Congress, 36% of voters were Republican.”

Still , according to analysts, WaPo’s bias is consistent, which means changes within WaPo polls are actually meaningful.

Check out what happened to Obama’s favorability among women over the time period in which the White House and its media kennels ranted that Republicans just want women to be Stepford Wives:

Obama lost 6 points to Romney among women registered to vote.

Obama lost 21 points to Romney among married women!

Poll info sources:
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/05/22/Poll-Proves-Obama-Lost-War-On-Women
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/05/22/wapo-abc-poll-assumes-lowest-gop-turnout-in-decades-to-boost-obama
http://www.gallup.com/poll/15370/Party-Affiliation.aspx

1 Comment

Filed under Barack Obama, Democrats, Media Bias, Mitt Romney, Polls, Republicans

Obama’s Glass House

Click on graphics to embiggen.

In 1993, Bain Capital risked millions to try and save an outdated steel plant that was about to shut down. The plant workers expressed their gratitude and business acumen by staging a nasty 10-week strike in 1997, just as competition from cheap imports was driving the price of steel down and the cost of making steel was skyrocketing. Romney left Bain in 1999. Two years later, nearly half of all U.S. steel companies failed, including the Bain plant.

Sources:
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/05/20/cory-booker-slams-obama-campaign-for-attack-on-romney-bain-record/
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/05/20/top-romney-surrogate-answers-bain-attacks-with-solyndra/
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2012/may/16/barack-obama/obama-ad-claims-romney-bain-left-misery-wake-gst-s/

Comments Off on Obama’s Glass House

Filed under Bain Capital, Barack Obama, Cory Booker, Mitt Romney

Newsweek’s Gaylo Cover

Click on graphics to embiggen.

Is it my imagination, or are the assaults on Judaeo-Christian faith actually getting more blatant, more frequent, and more obnoxious?

4 Comments

Filed under Barack Obama, Media Bias, Mitt Romney

Fact Check says Life of Julia is bogus

The Obama campaign’s “Life of Julia” slide show depicts a fictional woman whose life from age 3 to 67 is better under the president’s policies than under those of Republican Mitt Romney. But the facts do not support statements in the slide show.

1. Romney would leave Julia with “nothing but a voucher” to buy health insurance at age 65. Wrong. The plan Romney has endorsed would let her choose between traditional Medicare fee-for-service coverage, or a variety of private plans with premiums partially paid by the government.

2. As a senior citizen under Romney, Julia would have to pay “$6,350 extra per year” for a health care plan similar to Medicare. Wrong. This cost estimate is based on old and invalid cost estimates.

3. At age 67, Julia could “retire comfortably” under Obama but, “Under Mitt Romney: Julia’s benefits could be cut by 40%.” Wrong. Social Security is rapidly going broke. The trustees predict that all Social Security beneficiaries will be hit with a 25% cut by 2033 unless changes are made. Obama has proposed no plan to avoid this.

4. As a 22-year-old college student, Julia needs surgery that is covered “due to a provision in health care reform” keeping her on her parents’ insurance. Fair enough. But she’d probably be covered anyway: Thirty-seven states already have similar mandates on the books.

5. As a 31-year-old expectant mother, Julia “benefits from maternal checkups” required under Obamacare. But she would probably get that care anyway, since 85 percent of full-time workers have health insurance now, and a 1978 federal law already requires that employer-provided insurance generally must “cover expenses for pregnancy-related conditions.”

For details on each point made above, go to
http://factcheck.org/2012/05/the-life-of-julia-corrected/

Comments Off on Fact Check says Life of Julia is bogus

Filed under Barack Obama, Medicare/Medicaid, Mitt Romney, Obamacare, Social Security

Bullying

 “Back in the day you would get beaten up or punched in the yard and you’d tell a teacher and they’d just tell you to suck it up, you know, or that’s just what boys do or that’s just how girls are and ‘You two knock it off,’ and that was the extent of it,” said psychologist Jerry Weichman, who works with adolescents at the Hoag Neurosciences Institute in Newport Beach, Calif. http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/story/2012-05-12/mitt-romney-hijinks-bullying/54915566/1

I am just a tad younger than Mitt Romney, so can report first hand that Weichman has it exactly right about the ’60s academic attitude toward bullying.

I was far from being one of the kids the bullies routinely targeted, yet I remember being gut punched twice and having my wrists twist-burned by male classmates in elementary school. It never occurred to me to tattle. The school wouldn’t have done anything and my parents would have reamed me out for being a wimp.

Bullying definitely went on and it was not punished. But the really serious perps in our school were not the kids, but the two male teachers. The gym teacher delighted in joining into our pre-adolescent games of Dodge Ball so he could fire the ball at kids on the other team. This guy was an adult athlete. He LIKED hurting little kids with those damned red rubber balls.

The other guy was my sixth grade teacher who was a weekend minister at a small church in the community. This paragon of Christian virtue, rather than stifling or at least ignoring the verbal abuse the bullies heaped on the weaker kids, actually joined in on it and, like Mr. Sadist of the Gym, enjoyed himself immensely.

I’m not sure which of these two I despise more. But thinking back, in this climate, what incentive was there for a strong leader like Mitt Romney to behave any differently than the adult mentors the school provided? School in the 60s was not a cuddly pc environment. You had three choices:

  1. Bully
  2. Be bullied
  3. Lay low and hope for the best

I watched Jimmy Carter and Barack Obama steer our nation down some very dark paths by choosing doors number 2 and 3. Forgive me if I think someone who picked door number 1 might have the kind of strong backbone I want in that important job.

I feel sorry for the kids who got bullied. I really do. I felt bad for them when it was happening in my school. I was targeted a few times myself, which makes me even more ashamed that I was too much of a wimp to even try to stick up for the kids who got it all the time.

But what Mitt Romney may or may not have done fifty years ago in high school has no impact on who I intend to vote for in November.

4 Comments

Filed under Barack Obama, Jimmy Carter, Mitt Romney

The laughs just keep coming!

OMG! Ann Romney might have tried to use an expired coupon once upon a time! Call the Media!

Oh wait. Somebody already did.

Posted today in comments @ PoliNation: “I heard a former grocery checker on the radio say that Mrs. Romney once tried to use an expired coupon. Horrors. How could we have such a dishonest first lady!”

ARE THEY KIDDING?! ROFLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL

(If Ann only got one coupon wrong, she’s way ahead of me. The expiry dates on the darn things are so small, you need a magnifying glass to read them.)

The comment continued: “Not like the the paragon of virtue now in the White House. You know, the one who fabricated the story about why she no longer has a law license.”

Oh, yeah. THAT old story … one of the many the media ignored in favor of things like criticizing Sarah Palin for NOT staying home with her five kids.

Odd how THAT tune has changed … now Ann Romney is a useless blight on society because she DID stay home with her five kids.

At least Ann actually raised her five boys.

Michelle Obama was sure she would need more help with her two girls than her White House staff of 60+ could provide, so her Mommy moved in to the First Mansion too.

For those of you who are late to the party, the media portrayed Michelle as a “distinguished attorney” who chose to forgo the big bucks in corporate law so she could “have a career motivated by passion and not just money.”

Blah blah blah. Outside the lapdog media’s kennels, her “career” doesn’t look so hot.

1988: Michelle Robinson was graduated from Harvard Law School and walked right into a job as an associate lawyer at the prestigious Chicago corporate law firm of Sidley & Austin. Typically, incoming law grads are given the summer to prepare for the bar.

Michelle Robinson, Harvard Law School grad, took IL bar for the first time in 1988 and flunked.

97% of Harvard Law School (ranked 3rd in nation) graduates who took the NYS bar for the first time in 2007 passed.

89% of Loyola University Chicago School of Law (ranked 67th in nation) graduates who took the IL bar for the first time in 2010 passed.

1989: Michelle passed the exam second time around and was admitted to the Illinois bar.

1991: She left Sidley & Austin. In June of 2008, she told the New York Times it was because she had been unfulfilled by her law career and “wanted to have a career motivated by passion and not just money.” This is what a peer of hers at Sidley had to say:

Michele’s office was on my floor at the firm and I would walk by it everyday. She was rarely in the office, had very limited work papers in her office, yet apparently was drawing an associate salary while not practicing law, and billing huge hours as is ordinary for an associate. My fellow associates and I worked to 10 p.m. customarily and many times to 2 to 3 a.m., every weekend, meeting the crushing work loads. But Michele never had to do that, which understandably caused a lot of resentment amongst fellow associates. I have no first hand knowledge since it would be a private and confidential arrangement, but the associate scuttlebutt drawn from partner “leaks” was that she was drawing a firm salary while working full time for City Hall doing political fund raising and “special projects” work for the Daley Machine. The word was that this arrangement benefited the firm because many times their real estate clients had city zoning and other legal issues that required city approvals or resolution, so the firm needed to be viewed as on the city hall team and accede to their wishes. So from the very start of her career my opinion is that Michelle was the beneficiary of the nefarious city hall back scratching schemes. As demonstrated by The Obama File, she seems to have benefitted from these “arrangements” her entire professional career. I have my doubts that she did much at the University of Chicago to justify such an enormous salary and have never heard tell of any significant projects she was handling, let alone any accomplishments or major successes in the healthcare field.

Michele at one point did leave officially to work for the Daley Administration, but was already well engaged in political activities during the day and regularly absent from the firm for a lengthy period of time before she left. I can’t recall the precise timelines but I would estimate that she was listed as an associate at the firm but not carrying a regular work load for well over one year, maybe even two years before she “left” for the City Hall payroll.

On a personal note, Michele was simply the most angry, arrogant and caustic young person I have ever met in my life. She simply would not engage with her fellow associates and apparently viewed herself as superior to them. I personally observed that she would only engage with partners, most notably senior partners. Never a friendly smile or good morning for staff or fellow associates as she walked past them day after day after day. I remember one particular instance where a group of associates and I were chatting at a firm cocktail party and I noted how no one seemed to know Michele but were constantly gossiping about her. The gang just commented about how arrogant and unfriendly she was and never around. I commented that maybe she was just uncomfortable as a Southside girl being around all of these elitist, snobby white folks at a silk stocking firm. So I walked over to her when she was getting hors d’oeuvres and introduced myself as a friendly overture. She gave me a dirty look, literally threw her head back and turned her back on me and walked back over the a group of senior partners gathered around Eden Martin! As if you say how dare you approach me you filthy little underling. I went back to my group of associates friends feeling embarrassed and they just chuckled and said “told ya’.” So, Michele was not the sweet or kind person the media would like us to believe. She was an elitist and only was interested in those who could advance her personal interest, not ordinary folks. To this day, that episode was the rudest I have ever been treated by anyone, and there are lot of rude lawyers out there.

[But OMG, fifty years ago, Mitt Romney might have said something mean to some kid in his high school! Get a camera crew!]

1991 to 1993: Michelle worked as an assistant for Valerie Jarrett, then-deputy chief of staff for Chicago Mayor Richard Daley.

1993: Just four years after her admission to the Illinois bar, her right to practice was rescinded by court order.

Chrissy’s Site Bites @ http://news.webshots.com/photo/2078824670056011884bhvseI

Click on graphic to embiggen.

Note: The ARDC is NOT the Illinois Bar where one can voluntarily become an inactive attorney by simply not paying the renewal fee or keeping up with required in-service coursework. The ARDC is the agency of the Supreme Court of Illinois which registers attorneys and investigates complaints of illegal, unethical or dishonest conduct filed against attorneys holding a license to practice law in Illinois.

Upon investigation, the Supreme Court of Illinois will ultimately decide if a lawyer should be censured (publicly rebuked), suspended (having the law license to practice either taken away for a certain period of time or placed on a probationary period) or disbarred (having the law license taken away indefinitely). Michelle Obama was disbarred.

1993: At the same time she was running from her dirty secret, Michelle also left the mayor’s office. Connected? Ya think?! So what does a not-terribly-bright, pampered, bitter, black Chicago politico’s daughter do when she manages to screw up that badly? She sticks her face in the public trough and becomes a community organizer, or course.

Michelle launched the Chicago office of Public Allies, a taxpayer-funded organization that paid young people to receive training in Left-wing politics and activism, then helped place them in positions with nonprofit groups and government agencies.

  • Michelle’s husband, Barack Obama, was a member of the group’s founding advisory board.
  • President Clinton declared Public Allies a model for national service.
  • First Lady Hilary Clinton hosted a Rose Garden reception for the group.

Does the media care? Nah.

They remind me of The Cat in the Hat by Dr. Seuss: “Poor Dick and Sally. It’s cold and wet and they’re stuck in the house with nothing to do . . . until a giant cat in a hat shows up, transforming the dull day into a madcap adventure and almost wrecking the place in the process!”

Sources:

http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2008/12/wtf-michelle-ob.html

https://www.iardc.org/lawyersearch.asp

What happened to Michelle Obama’s law license?

http://www.ilrg.com/rankings/law/index.php/1/desc/Bar

http://www.halfsigma.com/2008/02/michelle-obama.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loyola_University_Chicago_School_of_Law

http://www.theobamafile.com/_family/PeerReview.htm

http://www.theobamafile.com/_family/PeerReview.htm

H/t GP

4 Comments

Filed under Ann Romney, Barack Obama, Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, Media Bias, Michelle Obama, Mitt Romney, Valerie Jarrett