Category Archives: Unemployment

Barely a blip UPDATED

July 29, 2012: DNC Chair Rep. Debbie Wasserman-Schultz on “Face the Nation” (CBS)

After Dismal GDP Report, DNC Chair Says Things Are Turning Around [:40]

Let’s just put two things she says in context.

About the economy having contracted just before Obama took office … that contraction happened two years after DEMOCRATS took over majority control in Washington, during the two year period when Obama was in the Senate.

As for the “twelfth straight quarter of growth”, may I just say Big Freakin’ Whoop about that? She’s talking about increases in the GDP that are so small, they barely register on the only graph I really understand and care about, which is this one showing what percentage of Americans have JOBS.

10 pm Tuesday: UPDATED GRAPHIC with GOP Senate Majority Leaders fixed and new CSB’s URL! (Thank you, Auntie Lib!)

Chrissy’s Site Bites @ http://news.webshots.com/photo/2163246140056011884TAdfdR

Click on graphic to embiggen.

If you like this, you might also enjoy https://polination.wordpress.com/2012/07/07/tax-cuts-put-people-back-to-work/

H/t to Pistol Pete for W-S video and to Red Pill for data I used for the graph.

4 Comments

Filed under Barack Obama, Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, Democrats, Economy, Republicans, U.S. Congress, Unemployment

Obama holds second Cabinet meeting of 2012

Click on graphics to embiggen.

Chrissy’s Site Bites @ http://news.webshots.com/photo/2261774110056011884RQhqqc

The purpose of the Cabinet is both to advise the President and to rein in any attempts by him to abuse his power. Reagan and George W. Bush each met with their Cabinets 36 times in their first year alone.

Obama has convened his Cabinet only twice in the past 8 months. He has met individually with his Secretaries of Defense (18), Treasury (15), and State (14), plus one meeting each with Agriculture and Veterans Affairs. But he has not sat down with the other ten at all.

Some of these omissions are particularly puzzling.

How could he not meet with Attorney General Eric H. Holder even once during all that time Congress had Holder on the hot seat, then voted to hold him in contempt? And where did he get the nerve to grant Holder “executive privilege” when they hadn’t even talked?

Gas prices are still killing us all, at the pumps and in higher prices for everything that gets shipped anywhere, which is pretty much everything. Yet Obama never once met with his Secretary of Energy.

He also never met with his Secretaries of Commerce or Labor, despite record-high unemployment and record-low economic growth.

And did someone call off that terrorist threat thing? Obama never met with his Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano.

He also never met with Kathleen Sebelius, his Secretary of Health and Human Services and the author of the HHS mandate that has led to dozens of lawsuits and a revolt among formerly loyal-to-Democrats Catholics.

It’s easy to see where his priorities lie.

Chrissy’s Site Bites @ http://news.webshots.com/photo/2016565770056011884eJybeY

Even when he works, he doesn’t work!

Chrissy’s Site Bites @ http://news.webshots.com/photo/2340349730056011884WGxTfc

Sources:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/President%27s_Cabinet

http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/obama-holds-first-cabinet-meeting-january_648993.html

http://usgovinfo.about.com/od/thepresidentandcabinet/a/prescababout.htm

http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=1YVKAAAAIBAJ&sjid=EZQMAAAAIBAJ&pg=6749%2C1745890

http://www.whitehouse.gov/schedule/president/2012-01 etc.

2 Comments

Filed under Barack Obama, Democrats, Economy, Eric Holder, HHS, Janet Napolitano, Kathleen Sebelius, Unemployment

Ten million missing jobs

Chrissy’s Site Bites @ http://news.webshots.com/photo/2446318850056011884hLPGHv

Click on graphic to embiggen.

Doing Fine?

Sources:

http://itooktheredpill.wordpress.com/2012/07/13/over-10-million-jobs/

http://righthandedcartoons.blogspot.com/

1 Comment

Filed under Barack Obama, Democrats, Economy, George W. Bush, Republicans, Unemployment

Republicans put people to work

Chrissy’s Site Bites @ http://news.webshots.com/photo/2770890260056011884eADYGU

Click on graphic to embiggen.

If you like this, you might also enjoy @ https://polination.wordpress.com/2012/06/01/reaganomics-vs-obamanomics/

Source @ http://nation.foxnews.com/unemployment-rate/2012/07/08/unemployment-rate-dropped-every-state-elected-gop-gov-2010

1 Comment

Filed under Democrats, Republicans, Unemployment

Tax cuts put people back to work!

Click on graphics to embiggen.

This graph provides a very clear demonstration of the difference between Republican and Democrat economic policies. Republicans trust the free market. Democrats trust big government.

Despite an economic bubble burst AND a major terror attack on our own soil, Bush proposed and a Republican majority Congress passed tax cuts for everyone. This action was followed immediately by an increase in jobs.

Then Democrats took over the majority in Washington and the housing bubble burst. No major terror attack or worry if we will go to war or not. In fact, by 2008, when the downturn in the economy really got rolling, the war in Iraq was mostly over and, despite what the media and Democrats were blatting, we had won.

So what do Democrats do with their economic downturn? They tax, borrow and spend of course. They instituted not one, but two of their signature fixes … a huge bail-out, followed by an even huger stimulus package. Their putative fixes did not just fail to help; they actually made the problem a whole lot worse.

Isn’t it time we put those Big Government Obama Democrats into the back seat where they belong and return leadership to the people whose free market methods have PROVEN they can produce JOBS?

2012-1995 Tax cuts put people back to work

You think the economy is bad now? Just wait until all those ObamaCare taxes kick in!

2012_07 06 ObamaCare Tax Increases Coming Jan 2013

Used with permission from http://terrellaftermath.com/

If you like this, you might also enjoy @ https://polination.wordpress.com/2012/06/15/small-businesses-struggling-to-stay-afloat/

H/t to RedPill.

Source @ http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS12300000

22 Comments

Filed under Democrats, Economy, Republicans, Taxes, Terrorism, Unemployment

Some good news for our side

I just finished scoping out four opinion polls about the HHS mandate that date from February, March, May and June of this year. For those who want it, the data and URLs are provided below. But first, here are my thoughts.

A May poll of Adult Americans showed a very high degree of passion and support for freedom of religion above all else. It’s very rare to get a ZERO in the Meh crowd. [Meh = Don’t Know, No Opinion, It Depends.] But that’s what this poll found when they asked,

“Should freedom of religion be protected, even if it conflicts with other laws?”

26% No vs. 74% Yes vs. 0% Meh.

Clearly, as a nation, we really care about religious freedom. I have seen this 1:3 split in other polls on hot issues, including in another question from that same May poll.

“Is it morally wrong to force health care workers and doctors to provide abortion when they object for religious reasons?”

27% No vs. 72% Yes vs. 1% Meh.

I believe the 1:3 reflects the Hard-Left vs. Center-Right divide in America today. The Democrat Media Complex blats about how they are the majority and we are the extremist fringey tinfoil hatters. But the real truth is the opposite.

This is something to keep in mind when talking to those critical Undecided voters. The Hard-Leftists are already committed to the Democrats, so the likelihood that an Undecided is fundamentally Center-Right on most issues is very, very high. Find their hot buttons and focus on how Obama Democrats have violated those core values.

I saw another phenomenon in the May poll that I’ve seen before. Despite 74% of these same people saying they supported freedom of religion above all else, when the questions got specific about birth control, abortion, etc., support for the primacy of religious freedom dropped to between 51% and 58%.

But it shouldn’t have mattered whether the question was “Does religious freedom trump everything?” or “Does religious freedom trump this, that or the other thing?” Everything should mean everything, right? Except apparently it didn’t for about one-third of the people who said it did.

I see the same disconnect in presidential approval polls. When the question is “Do you approve of the job Obama is doing?”, the numbers are always higher than they are for subordinate issues, like “Do you approve of the job Obama is doing on the economy?” or “the war in Afghanistan?” etc.

The best explanation I can come up with is that people weenie out on reporting their real opinions when there is a hot button issue in the question. The Democrat Media Complex hounds us with certain messages about what it means to be a “good” person. Like, “If you don’t like Barack Obama, you’re a dirty RAAAAACIST!!!” And “If you don’t support birth control, you HATE WOMEN!!!” So the poll questions that include a culturally-charged anxiety trigger get a less honest answer than one that homes in on a core value.

It could be the other way around. I.e., that these people are all for religious freedom as long as it doesn’t interfere with them getting free stuff. I hope not. Freedom of religion is the reason many of us (or our ancestors) left everything familiar to come here. I think we’re more attached to it than the Left realizes.

If I’m right, then the higher number in the straight-up “religious freedom is primary” question is the accurate number while the lower numbers that are attached to culturally-charged anxiety triggers are less accurate. I guess we’ll find out in November when voters are not answering a live pollster … “What will she think of me?!” … but casting secret ballots that will help decide the fate of the nation.

The March poll provides support for my thesis. It asked twice about forcing health insurance plans to provide free birth control, once for just anybody and then again for groups that have moral or religious objections to birth control. Where the question was purely secular, opposition to mandatory free birth control was 51%. But when they mentioned religious or moral objections in the question, opposition increased by 6 points. And notice in the June poll that the HHS mandate issue ALONE has resulted in a 13% to 16% shift toward opposition to Obama!

I think the lesson for us is clear.

When we’re talking with those critical Undecideds who will swing this close race for or against us, we should couch the discussions in terms of CORE values.

“It’s not about birth control. It’s about keeping the government from forcing people to violate their religious beliefs.”

“This is not about race. We elected a black man to our highest office. We’ve proven we aren’t a racist nation anymore. Now we need to ask if he has fixed the economy and gotten people back to work like he said he would.”

One final point … I’m interested in how well our messaging is getting past the alphabet media blockade, so I snooped through the data to see if I could see any signs that there’s been a shift in opinion over the five months these polls tracked. I think there has been and it’s to our side.

Three polls asked variations on the generic question: Should health insurance plans be required to provide free birth control? The February poll showed 43% of Likely Voters opposed, but the March and May polls both showed 51% of Adult Americans opposed. Since Likely Voters generally poll more Center-Right than Adult Americans, the actual shift toward support for religious freedom may have been even higher than 8%. And it’s held up against the Left’s onslaughts.

Thank God for the First Amendment, talk radio, the internet and our church pulpits!

A Survey of recent opinion polls re: The HHS Mandate

February 2012 (Likely Voters)

Should health insurance companies be required by law to provide free …

… Contraception: 43% No.

… Morning after pills: 50% No.

March 2012 (Adult Americans)

Should health insurance plans for all employees have to cover the full cost of birth control for female employees or should employers be able to opt out for moral or religious reasons?

Plans offered by secular institutions: 40% Must cover vs. 51% Opt out vs. 9% Meh.

Plans offered by religious institutions: 36% Must cover vs. 57% Opt out vs. 7% Meh.

CtH: The second “Opt out” is 6% higher and the Meh is 2% lower. Another sign that we have a special place in our hearts for protecting religious freedom.

May 2012 (Adult Americans)

Should freedom of religion be protected, even if it conflicts with other laws?

Adults: 74% Yes vs. 26% No vs. 0% Meh.

Is it morally wrong to force health care workers and doctors to provide abortion when they object for religious reasons?

Adults: 72% Yes vs. 27% No vs. 1% Meh.

Should individual health care providers and organizations providing health insurance policies be allowed to opt out of providing …

Abortion: 58% Yes vs. 38% No vs. 4% Meh

Birth control pills: 51% Yes vs. 46% No vs. 3% Meh

Abortion-inducing drugs: 51% Yes vs. 44% No vs. 5% Meh

Medication to speed the death of a terminally ill patient: 55% Yes vs. 41% No vs. 4% Meh

In vitro fertilization treatments that could result in the death of an embryo: 52% Yes vs. 41% No vs. 7% Meh

Do you believe …

… Contraception is morally acceptable? 88% Yes.

… Abortion is wrong in an of itself? 58% Yes.

June 2012 (Registered Voters)

Is providing free birth control worthy of federal concern?

Catholics: 57% No vs. 37% Yes.

Women: 44% No vs. 51% Yes.

Does the federal government have the right to force morally objectionable coverage on religious institutions?

Women: 57% No.

Should birth control be treated like any other drug, without mandatory coverage?

Catholics: 67% Yes. Women 63% Yes.

Will the HHS mandate make you less likely to vote for Obama, more likely to vote for Obama, or have no impact on your vote?

Religiously active white females: 38% Less Likely vs. 12% More Likely. (38 – 12 = 16 away from Obama)

Catholics: 29% Less Likely vs. 13% More Likely. (29 – 13 = 16 away from Obama)

Independents: 28% Less Likely vs. 15% More Likely. (28 – 15 = 13 away from Obama)

Sources

February poll of Likely Voters by Rasmussen reported @

http://www.lifenews.com/2012/02/22/poll-americans-oppose-obama-birth-control-coverage-mandate/

March poll of Adult Americans by New York Times/CBS News reported @

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2012/03/13/us/politics/president-obamas-approval-rating-drops.html?ref=politics

May poll of Adult Americans by Marist College commissioned by the Knights of Columbus reported @

http://www.lifenews.com/2012/05/22/poll-majority-of-americans-oppose-obama-hhs-mandate/

June poll of Registered Voters by QEV Analytics commissioned by The Catholic Association reported @

http://www.lifenews.com/2012/06/19/new-poll-hhs-mandate-hurts-obama-with-women-catholics/

2 Comments

Filed under Abortion, Barack Obama, Democrats, Economy, Elections, First Amendment, HHS, Law, Media Bias, Obamacare, Polls, Race Relations, Religious Liberty, Unemployment

Unprecedentedly Out of Touch

Jolt [1:01]

Jun 11, 2012 by mittromney: Last Friday, the unemployment rate rose to 8.2 percent and 300,000 more people joined the long-term unemployed. One week later, President Obama said the private sector is doing fine. Only a president that presides over forty months of unemployment over 8 percent would think that the last jobs report is “doing fine.” These comments show that President Obama is completely out of touch with the middle class.


Chrissy’s Site Bites @ http://news.webshots.com/photo/2341787430056011884xvIgzH
Click on graphic to embiggen.

If you like this, you might also enjoy @ https://polination.wordpress.com/2012/06/08/out-of-touch/

Sources:
https://polination.wordpress.com/2012/06/11/the-monday-grudge-42/
http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2012/06/18/120618fa_fact_lizza

4 Comments

Filed under Barack Obama, Climate, Economy, Mitt Romney, Unemployment

Obama’s morbid vanity

Sarah Palin on Wisconsin Recall: “Obama had to distance himself from the solutions.”

“Solutions?” he says, “What solutions?”

“Obama is so self-satisfied that in his mind, his legacy was largely written before he stepped into office. So fervent is his ideological belief system that even objective evidence of his dismal policy failures doesn’t shake his confidence in his prescriptions.”  David Limbaugh @ http://www.wnd.com/2012/05/obamas-morbid-vanity/

Limbaugh’s article reminded me of our once-upon-a-time pediatrician.

My youngest was on the 50th percentile for height and weight from birth through 2 months checkup, but at her next, 4 months, she had dropped into the 5th. I think in that time she gained something like 4 ounces. Her doctor seemed less than concerned; I was alarmed.

For six months, the baby’s growth crept along in that very-small-for-her-age place. If she’d been small from the start, that would be okay. But she hadn’t been.

The pediatrician diddled around with a “wait and see” attitude, which made me slightly nuts. So I went and did my own research, ultimately taking the baby to a specialist. He did some tests and worked with me to create a treatment plan, which we instituted at about the eight months mark.

Within six weeks of starting, the baby’s rate of growth had QUADRUPLED. When I showed this to the pediatrician and told her what the specialist and I had done, she just sniffed and said the treatment hadn’t done anything at all.

“You just started feeding her more.”

IOW, rather than admit that the treatment plan was effective, she as good as accused me of STARVING my infant for SIX MONTHS.

That kid is now 28 years old and I STILL want to slap that damn doctor. I KNOW that if she had prescribed a treatment that produced a quadrupling of growth, she’d have taken credit.

Ditto Obama’s policies. If they’d worked, he’d take credit. They haven’t worked, but he won’t take blame.


Chrissy’s Site Bites @ http://news.webshots.com/photo/2023608170056011884sSupNY
Click on graphic to embiggen

5 Comments

Filed under Barack Obama, Economy, Elections, Sarah Palin, Unemployment

The Misery of Democrat Leadership

Click on graphics to embiggen.

During the twelve years of Republican leadership, the highest unemployment rate was 6.3%, which lasted for only one month in 2003. During the last month that Republicans held majority control, unemployment was 4.4%.

After Democrats took majority control of the federal government in January 2007 and during the last two years of Bush’s tenure, unemployment rose from 4.4% to 7.3%. In January 2009, when Obama moved into the Oval Office, unemployment stood at 7.8% and has been at or above 8.1% for all 40 months since. For 28 of those 40 months, unemployment stood between 9.0% and 10.0%.

Do you need any other reason to vote for Republicans this fall?

2012_05 Democrat leadership equals human misery

Thanks to Itooktheredpill for his feedback about my two previous employment and party control graphics. I implemented his suggestions, combining the best features of each. The quality of this one (below) owes a lot to his assistance!

2012_06 Employment and GOP vs DEM leadership

Sources:

If you like this, you might also enjoy @ https://polination.wordpress.com/2012/06/03/recovering-from-recession/

5 Comments

Filed under Barack Obama, Democrats, Economy, George W. Bush, Harry Reid, John Boehner, Nancy Pelosi, Republicans, U.S. Congress, Unemployment

Recovering from recession

Click on graphics to embiggen.

Chrissy’s Site Bites @ http://news.webshots.com/photo/2011466310056011884pfMSIO

Chrissy’s Site Bites @ http://news.webshots.com/photo/2861970340056011884fRYzeg

Chrissy’s Site Bites @ http://news.webshots.com/photo/2141691930056011884ihrUra

If you like this, you might also enjoy @ https://polination.wordpress.com/2012/06/01/reaganomics-vs-obamanomics/

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics @ http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS14000000

4 Comments

Filed under Barack Obama, Democrats, Economy, George W. Bush, Republicans, Unemployment